Anonymous wrote:The term ‘no grit’ is what I always hear from college coaches when talking about capital players. Say that are not hungry.

OMG, I laughed so hard at this I wet my pants. You are so plugged in! I’m dead. Thank you for that. Whew!

The term ‘no grit’ is what I always hear from college coaches when talking about capital players. Say that are not hungry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes, I have compiled all that data. On average they are doing the same as Capital.

Correct. As I said at the very beginning of this thread: DMV players will never match the skills and athleticism of the Philadelphia area and Long Island players. The tried and true Baltimorons are up there, obviously, but the DC/VA close in MD, they just don't learn the best lacrosse.

Coaching is mediocre in the DMV. That’s the reason. Has nothing to do with athleticism. The cheesesteaks in Philly don’t provide kids extra speed.

Triggered? You must be fun at parties.

Anonymous wrote:Capital coaching is mediocre. They have historically had the best players in the area and won off of athleticism and forcing you to train at HB.

Will you go away already - go on some baltimore forum and gargle on the nether regions of baltimore clubs.

Your annoying a$$ is insufferable.

Oh and M&D still ain't going to sleep with you....

Capital coaching is mediocre. They have historically had the best players in the area and won off of athleticism and forcing you to train at HB.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes, I have compiled all that data. On average they are doing the same as Capital.

Correct. As I said at the very beginning of this thread: DMV players will never match the skills and athleticism of the Philadelphia area and Long Island players. The tried and true Baltimorons are up there, obviously, but the DC/VA close in MD, they just don't learn the best lacrosse.

This is just nonsense. "Never match the skills and athleticism". Sounds like a cartoon villain.

Current graduating class from Capital finished as the number 2 team in the US Club Lax rankings. Lots of Philly, LI, MA, etc teams in their wake. How did they beat all of them without the "best lacrosse", I wonder? Maybe it was skills and athleticism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes, I have compiled all that data. On average they are doing the same as Capital.

Correct. As I said at the very beginning of this thread: DMV players will never match the skills and athleticism of the Philadelphia area and Long Island players. The tried and true Baltimorons are up there, obviously, but the DC/VA close in MD, they just don't learn the best lacrosse.

Mass has more players on the top three teams than PA. PA has just two more players than the DMV on those teams. Here's the breakdown:

Total players on UNC, BC, NW:

NY = 25
Mass = 15
NJ / PA / CT = 9
MD = 7
DMV / CA = 5

Correction: PA has two more than MD teams, 4 more than DMV

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes, I have compiled all that data. On average they are doing the same as Capital.

Correct. As I said at the very beginning of this thread: DMV players will never match the skills and athleticism of the Philadelphia area and Long Island players. The tried and true Baltimorons are up there, obviously, but the DC/VA close in MD, they just don't learn the best lacrosse.

Mass has more players on the top three teams than PA. PA has just two more players than the DMV on those teams. Here's the breakdown:

Total players on UNC, BC, NW:

NY = 25
Mass = 15
NJ / PA / CT = 9
MD = 7
DMV / CA = 5

Lol

Anonymous wrote:yes, I have compiled all that data. On average they are doing the same as Capital.

Correct. As I said at the very beginning of this thread: DMV players will never match the skills and athleticism of the Philadelphia area and Long Island players. The tried and true Baltimorons are up there, obviously, but the DC/VA close in MD, they just don't learn the best lacrosse.