Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?
Why are only govt employees called back 5 days a week? Why are private companies employees still hybrid 2-3 days in office or 100% remote. It’s not fair.
Private employers can much more easily deal with poor performers than the government.
Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?[/quote
Why are only govt employees called back 5 days a week? Why are private companies employees still hybrid 2-3 days in office or 100% remote. It’s not fair.
They're not all hybrid.
/Amazon
No one said they all were. Are you illiterate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?[/quote
Why are only govt employees called back 5 days a week? Why are private companies employees still hybrid 2-3 days in office or 100% remote. It’s not fair.
They're not all hybrid.
/Amazon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?
Why are only govt employees called back 5 days a week? Why are private companies employees still hybrid 2-3 days in office or 100% remote. It’s not fair.
Private employers can much more easily deal with poor performers than the government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?
Why are only govt employees called back 5 days a week? Why are private companies employees still hybrid 2-3 days in office or 100% remote. It’s not fair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Where is the proof that people weren’t being honest? If it’s such a widespread problem to the point the entire government has to be prevented from teleworking, there must be a ton of concrete evidence they can present to justify the policy. Why haven’t they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The RTO has been great. People are productive. They are collaborating more. They are answering their phones. There is a team feeling among the newbies. There is sharing and learning being accomplished. It is terrific. Sorry about the commute, but otherwise it has been a good thing.
You should all be carpooling or taking the metro. Learn how to drive with courtesy and not like angry psychos. I can tell who is an angry fed and who is not
How many people are in your carpool? And why are you carpooling at all? You should have moved somewhere closer to the office. This is your fault.
No I worked here first. You all were flicking your beans at home for the last five years
Anonymous wrote:People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
People were not being honest with their hours. Where have you been?Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Anonymous wrote:Why does the administration not understand 5 days in office does not make sense? What is the agenda behind RTO?
Anonymous wrote:5 days in office plus commute times eat up a lot of time, energy and life. There is no energy left Monday to Friday to enjoy anything else. Seems like we went back 20 years in time at the office desk sitting era.
The main folks to lose out will be women and children. Moms who have to sit in office 5 days 59 hours a week with long commutes will not be able to pay attention to the needs of her young children and family.