Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is signing the deferred resignation offer somehow worse than just normally resigning? At this point, I just want to get out of the federal government. The chance that I’ll get admin leave is nice, but I don’t care if I don’t get it. Should I sign it? Or would I actually be worse off signing this agreement than if I just resigned normally?
Worst case scenario is ethics prevents you from getting a second job, you collect 7 months of administrative leave pay, and the program is deemed illegal and you have to pay it back. There's caselaw that when the government makes a mistake you still have to pay them back.
Actually I think worst case is your agency accepting your resignation and not paying at all. You waive all your rights to appeal or take any action regarding what happens when you take the offer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one I know at work is even considering it.
Everyone is considering. They are not saying it out loud.
Yeah, this thread reminds me of the pre-election threads saying “I don’t know anyone who is going to vote for Trump….” Yes you do, they just aren’t sharing with you because they know how you feel about them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know at least 5 pple -myself included- in a fed OGC who are taking the "Fork" offer. I will get "VERA" as well. The option is to go in 5 days/ week, as well as potentially be converted to schedule F and RIF'd with no severance, process, etc.
Our office in a couple of the practice areas is going to completely collapse.
I call BS. 5 lawyers falling for this? No way.
My DH and I are both lawyers and we’re both taking it. We were planning to quit anyway, so taking this offer is just taking the chance that we’ll get something instead of the nothing we’d get when one normally resigns.
What exactly are lawyers going to do in a post law country? Everything can be solved by AI and the tech sector.
Not really. As even OPM knows since they just exempted lawyers from the probationary termination reporting.
We aren’t post law yet. The administration needs lawyers to give a veneer of legality to what they’re doing, and a lot of lawyers will be working on the court challenges for years to come.
Were they excluded because they’re going to be reclassified to have even fewer rights than a probationary employee and then mass fired?
Probably, but they could have fired the ones on probation without having reclassified.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hold the line.
Meeting at 1pm tomorrow. Let President Musk and his cronies figure out a new plan for firing people. I’m sure they will but make it difficult.
What mtg is that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know at least 5 pple -myself included- in a fed OGC who are taking the "Fork" offer. I will get "VERA" as well. The option is to go in 5 days/ week, as well as potentially be converted to schedule F and RIF'd with no severance, process, etc.
Our office in a couple of the practice areas is going to completely collapse.
I call BS. 5 lawyers falling for this? No way.
My DH and I are both lawyers and we’re both taking it. We were planning to quit anyway, so taking this offer is just taking the chance that we’ll get something instead of the nothing we’d get when one normally resigns.
What exactly are lawyers going to do in a post law country? Everything can be solved by AI and the tech sector.
Not really. As even OPM knows since they just exempted lawyers from the probationary termination reporting.
We aren’t post law yet. The administration needs lawyers to give a veneer of legality to what they’re doing, and a lot of lawyers will be working on the court challenges for years to come.
Were they excluded because they’re going to be reclassified to have even fewer rights than a probationary employee and then mass fired?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is signing the deferred resignation offer somehow worse than just normally resigning? At this point, I just want to get out of the federal government. The chance that I’ll get admin leave is nice, but I don’t care if I don’t get it. Should I sign it? Or would I actually be worse off signing this agreement than if I just resigned normally?
Worst case scenario is ethics prevents you from getting a second job, you collect 7 months of administrative leave pay, and the program is deemed illegal and you have to pay it back. There's caselaw that when the government makes a mistake you still have to pay them back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is signing the deferred resignation offer somehow worse than just normally resigning? At this point, I just want to get out of the federal government. The chance that I’ll get admin leave is nice, but I don’t care if I don’t get it. Should I sign it? Or would I actually be worse off signing this agreement than if I just resigned normally?
My exact thoughts. Resigning anyways and I am also probationary. Tempted to fork, but wondering if I can hurt myself somehow by doing it. Don’t care if I don’t get paid at the end, I am leaving anyways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If unions stop this they will just move forward to the next phase. Mass firing. You dummies.
Unions will stop that too. I’m not sure why this upsets you so much. You come across as uninformed, and it’s not going to convince most ordinary people if you can’t control your emotions
Folks at USAid thought they wouldn't really be dissolved and that Congress would step in. "You can't close an agency without Congressional approval". Uh ok.
Anonymous wrote:Is signing the deferred resignation offer somehow worse than just normally resigning? At this point, I just want to get out of the federal government. The chance that I’ll get admin leave is nice, but I don’t care if I don’t get it. Should I sign it? Or would I actually be worse off signing this agreement than if I just resigned normally?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If unions stop this they will just move forward to the next phase. Mass firing. You dummies.
Unions will stop that too. I’m not sure why this upsets you so much. You come across as uninformed, and it’s not going to convince most ordinary people if you can’t control your emotions
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If unions stop this they will just move forward to the next phase. Mass firing. You dummies.
Unions will stop that too. I’m not sure why this upsets you so much. You come across as uninformed, and it’s not going to convince most ordinary people if you can’t control your emotions
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t mind being RIF’d because I’d get a year of severance, which is worth more than the admin leave. The trouble is, I’m very sure I won’t be RIF’d because my agency already doesn’t have enough people to do the work I do, which is statutorily mandated.
Anonymous wrote:If unions stop this they will just move forward to the next phase. Mass firing. You dummies.