Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NW
UCLA
Michigan
USC
Wisconsin/UIUC
Washington/Rutgers/UMD
Ohio State/Penn State/Purdue/Minn
Indiana/MSU/Iowa
Nebraska
You forgot Oregon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
NP. Out of curiosity just looked up NUs most recent CDS. Out of 2,111 first time freshmen, only 1,008 were deemed eligible for financial. HALF the class can afford $90k per year?! Certified rich kids school. Jeepers.
It's been that way for years. 35+ years ago it was 60%+ that were full pay. Yes a lot of rich kids. And then you had me and a lot of my friends, those of us on work-study, working every break we got, and having to manage expenses/spending money very carefully.
Frankly, it's like that at most of the T50 schools. 50-60%+ are full pay. Why is that shocking? If you make 200K+ (and have for at least 10 years as a family) you should be able to save if you value education. Just saving $1K/month for 18 years would net you $216K without any market returns. That can easily be $300K+ if put in the SP500 index over that time, if not more.
Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
Anonymous wrote:College Transitions does a pretty good job, IMO, of ranking programs within colleges and universities. Not perfect, not gospel, but pretty good. Here are those rankings for NU, UCLA, and UMich for the performing arts disciplines covered by College Transitions:
Music: NU, #7; UMich, #13; UCLA, #16 -- https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-music/
Film: UCLA, #7; UMich, #23; NU, not in top-30 -- https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-film/
Musical Theatre: UMich, #4; NU, #5; UCLA, not in top-20 -- https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-colleges-for-musical-theater/
Drama/Acting: NU, #2; UCLA, #3; UMich, #15 -- https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-drama-colleges/
Dance: UCLA, #3; UMich, #19; NU, #38 -- https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/best-dance-colleges/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
NP. Out of curiosity just looked up NUs most recent CDS. Out of 2,111 first time freshmen, only 1,008 were deemed eligible for financial. HALF the class can afford $90k per year?! Certified rich kids school. Jeepers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
Oh come on. The OOS kids at UCLA and Michigan are all the tippy top kids from their classes, largely valedictorian or close to it, 1500+ SATs, etc. Just stop it.
Very likely those kids applied to NU and got rejected. Seen it happen each year. UCLA and UMich are great schools, but there is a reason they are not T10 ranked, and NU has been for years (and in T20 for decades).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Music and Theater at NU are great, but they're not better than (or even as good as) at UCLA.
BS
NU Theater has been Top in the country for decades, yes it's not "Hollywood" but just look at the list of NU grads in Hollywood and broadway and other venues. Chicago 2nd City is a starting point for so many.
Music there is simply no comparison. The two schools are not on the same level (I know, I graduated from NU Music as one of my degrees) NU Music is conservatory level (Top 5 in country) with a normal university setting, where students are actually allowed and encouraged to double major (and many students do). I Did---have several friends in major orchestras around the country and world. Attended NU with people who are Hollywood stars.
Anonymous wrote:Music and Theater at NU are great, but they're not better than (or even as good as) at UCLA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
Oh come on. The OOS kids at UCLA and Michigan are all the tippy top kids from their classes, largely valedictorian or close to it, 1500+ SATs, etc. Just stop it.
Anonymous wrote:Northwestern
UCLA
Michigan/USC
Washington/Rutgers/Wisconsin/Illinois
Purdue/OSU/Maryland
MSU/Minnesota/Indiana/Penn State
Oregon/Iowa
Nebraska
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP, but the average caliber of undergraduates and the job options available to Northwestern grads is greater than those from UCLA or Michigan. If we're talking about the top 10% of undergrad populations from all three schools, however, they'd be quite equally matched.
The difference is that the top 60-75% at NU can compete with the Top 10% at UCLA or Michigan
Oh come on. The OOS kids at UCLA and Michigan are all the tippy top kids from their classes, largely valedictorian or close to it, 1500+ SATs, etc. Just stop it.