Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You could push for all schools to grow crops. Those crops can be used for lunches and sent home for kids that need them.

Children at schools can’t wipe down lunch tables or empty trash for their teacher; how do you think it would work for students to be working in the fields? Are teachers going to double as foreman to make the children work in the fields? Who is going to inspect, process, and package raw crops into consumer foodstuffs?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I think she just put her first foot wrong. Prices were up 1% on groceries this past year. This is bizarre - brings back memories of ‘70s price controls.

What do you think?

I think it’s a great idea! Someone needs to go after all these corporations stealing everyone’s money. There’s no such thing as inflation there’s only companies soaking people with high prices. Biden said this last year.

The government should determine prices on everything. They’ll do it fairly with regards to people’s income and with equity being a factor too. BIPOC and low SES consumers should be charged less than MC/UMC/wealthy whites because they’ve been historically marginalized.

Anonymous wrote:The Roman Empire tried to do price controls after they artificially inflated their ones supply by diluting the amount of silver in their currency.


Look how they ended up. Many vote those two reasons for why the great Roman republic collapsed. It’s almost as if Dems never opened a history book.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any serious person knows that the solution to inflation is not outlawing high prices. That's like saying the solution to healthcare costs is outlaw people getting sick. Harris should have followed the old saying "it's better to be silent and have people think you are fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

? um no, that would be like saying we need to regulate healthcare costs, which ANY normal person would agree with.

It is scary people like you are allowed to vote.


So the govt can print infinite amounts of money, the solution to controlling high prices resultant from that will be to install prices controls?

JFC, please don’t reproduce. USA is going full blown Venezuela at this rate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing. I don't care anything about this, but when people are constantly complaining about prices and inflation, and then she tries to propose a solution, it's heresy.

What do you want from her exactly? Trump hasn't said 2 words beyond, prices are up. Ok.

He’s talked repeatedly about fixing gas pipelines and bringing the US back to a place of energy independence and then energy dominance. Decreasing gas prices will naturally decrease the cost of goods across the board.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any serious person knows that the solution to inflation is not outlawing high prices. That's like saying the solution to healthcare costs is outlaw people getting sick. Harris should have followed the old saying "it's better to be silent and have people think you are fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

? um no, that would be like saying we need to regulate healthcare costs, which ANY normal person would agree with.

Anonymous wrote:You could push for all schools to grow crops. Those crops can be used for lunches and sent home for kids that need them.

Anonymous wrote:Any serious person knows that the solution to inflation is not outlawing high prices. That's like saying the solution to healthcare costs is outlaw people getting sick. Harris should have followed the old saying "it's better to be silent and have people think you are fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

Anonymous wrote:Price gouging would help millions and millions of Americans every single day so I am 100% for it as are my fiscally conservative relatives

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I think she just put her first foot wrong. Prices were up 1% on groceries this past year. This is bizarre - brings back memories of ‘70s price controls.

What do you think?

Perception is reality, so to all the people who are struggling to afford groceries because of corporate greed, this may play well no matter what the price data says.

+1 this is the answer

The proposal will likely not impact prices very much but will aim to send a message her administration cares about inflation. Consumers don't understand that reduced inflation (which has already happened) doesn't mean prices go down again, so this is how they tell voters "we hear you and we care".

It is a smart move.