Anonymous wrote:Reminder that the UK will be moving to the left at their next election, after years of conservative government. That's how it usually goes--people get tired of whichever party/coalition is in power after a while and want something new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Migrants are like water. No matter how hard countries try to seal their borders, the migrants will find ways to seep through the cracks. Expect global warming to accelerate this process.
When your foundation starts forming cracks, do you ignore it?
Anonymous wrote:The move to the right in Europe is driven by the young, who are not as beholden to the absurd post-WW2 foundational myths. Things could get quite bumpy in the future when young people reject the blank slate ideology that has governed since 1965.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many posters make valid points but the level of ignorance is shocking. Clearly most can’t differentiate between countries accepting refugees where it is a deliberate decision which involves setting targets or quotas (eg Germany taking 1 million Syrians), planned migration which may not may not include people from particular countries (eg Canada, Australia), and illegal migration which is incredibly difficult to stop.
Where it is planned, there are levers that can control it and public pushback can alter government policy. For example, Canada’s admission of huge numbers including many from the Punjabi region. Australia is also cutting back on legal permanent migration and the housing crisis is causing pushback against the 800,000 international students admitted each year.
But illegal immigration is incredibly difficult to control. And it is much harder in the EU than here where there is largely just one land border with Mexico to worry about. The EU has to deal with the entire Mediterranean Sea and entry over land borders in the east. No wall could protect those. The US largely has some 600 million people in central and South America to worry about. Europe has 1.5 billion in Africa plus those in the Middle East and Asia. So any war or climate-related disaster can result in a huge movement of people.
This idea of Europe having open borders to the world is ridiculous. Why do you think the EU has given $1 billion in aid to Lebanon? To stop it becoming a new route. Why do you think the EU funds the Libyan coastguard? To try to stop boats. I’m sure they would love to hear your brilliant ideas.
To not remove a stable government in Libya would have been an obvious answer if time machines were available.
Anonymous wrote:
They want it back from this:
“The Mayor of London is a Muslim. The mayor of Birmingham is a Muslim. The Mayor of Leeds is Muslim. Mayor of Blackburn – Muslim. The mayor of Sheffield is a Muslim. The mayor of Oxford is a Muslim. The mayor of Luton is a Muslim. The mayor of Oldham is Muslim. The mayor of Rochdale is Muslim. All this was achieved by only 4 million Muslims out of 66 million people in England.
“Today there are over 3,000 mosques in England. There are over 130 sharia courts. There are more than 50 Sharia Councils. 78 percent of Muslim women do not work, receive state support + free accommodation. 63 percent of Muslims do not work, receive state support + free housing. State-supported Muslim families with an average of 6 to 8 children receive free accommodation. Now every school in the UK is required to teach lessons about Islam.“