Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
summers off = unemployed
Really? Is MCPS going to stop paying your health insurance, forcing you to go on Cobra?
Teachers prepay their summer health insurance during the rest of the year. So when they have no income, they can finally get all the appointments taken care of that they can't do during the school year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
summers off = unemployed
Really? Is MCPS going to stop paying your health insurance, forcing you to go on Cobra?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
summers off = unemployed
Really? Is MCPS going to stop paying your health insurance, forcing you to go on Cobra?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
summers off = unemployed
Really? Is MCPS going to stop paying your health insurance, forcing you to go on Cobra?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
summers off = unemployed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Can I pay them less by giving them generous leave and summer's off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.
My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.
I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.
Can you clarify or explain "intense"? Or give a couple of examples? I guess my kids never had an intense principal. It doesn't sound good to me, but it could be I just don't understand the dynamic.
Intense as in a very present and involved way. Not in a bad way at all. Just put in many hours and came to everything. Fully invested.
Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.
My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.
I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.
You think the consequences for intentionally stomping on someone else’s body part (a minor child’s body part) are too great in this situation? You are delusional and if this were your precious child you’d be singing a different song
How do we know it was intentional? I don’t see from the charging document that intent is mentioned nor proven.
Are you that dumb or just that loyal to this person? The intent was enough to get him arrested. The police do not arrest you based on nothing, no matter what conspiracy theorists may say
NP. Why are you trolling this person? Use reason, not incentives, and you will better make your point. I never understand why people insert personal insults rather than just explain perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.
My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.
I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.
You think the consequences for intentionally stomping on someone else’s body part (a minor child’s body part) are too great in this situation? You are delusional and if this were your precious child you’d be singing a different song
How do we know it was intentional? I don’t see from the charging document that intent is mentioned nor proven.
Are you that dumb or just that loyal to this person? The intent was enough to get him arrested. The police do not arrest you based on nothing, no matter what conspiracy theorists may say
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl
Wtf??
Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.
The courts generally do not award much in damages in these cases
Especially when there are no actual witnesses just anonymous complaints.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.facebook.com/100064839515023/posts/pfbid02PzPLEBjej9urnvWUBf7HWUNe1kngsFYX9ChCvGmf4iXmk7FgSGeiCa6Qu6AEMi57l/?app=fbl
Wtf??
Well here comes another settlement. Time to lay off another 5 teachers to pay off a settlement for an incompetent administrator.
The courts generally do not award much in damages in these cases
Especially when there are no actual witnesses just anonymous complaints.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Same. It’s just a sad situation.
My kids had him at Barnsley too! He was intense but my kids really loved him. Thought he was funny and did silly things to motivate the kids. He could be loud but he always meant well.
I do wonder if we really know the whole story. While I agree all kids need to be safe the consequences seem a lot. Like MCPS didn’t do enough with Beidleman and now doing so much more, perhaps too much? I don’t know but it’s all very sad.
Can you clarify or explain "intense"? Or give a couple of examples? I guess my kids never had an intense principal. It doesn't sound good to me, but it could be I just don't understand the dynamic.
Anonymous wrote:The legal department will soon be the largest department in MCPS at this rate. Let’s cut teachers and hire more highly paid lawyers