Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still not in with a 138 CoGAT and 99.8 percentiles on some of the subtests on WISC with a 136 FISQ. His Winter iReady was only like 80% in reading, but 99 in math. Our schook doesn’t start advanced math until 5th, so he’s just screwed next year.
Did you indicate the fact that your school does not have advanced math in your cover letter. That was something I stressed , the lack of opportunity for challenge. It helped us
I did not and probably should have. I also put in the cover letter that I have years of experience teaching AAP/ UVA gifted endorsement and that my child fit the profile , which in hindsight may have pissed them off rather than helping?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still not in with a 138 CoGAT and 99.8 percentiles on some of the subtests on WISC with a 136 FISQ. His Winter iReady was only like 80% in reading, but 99 in math. Our schook doesn’t start advanced math until 5th, so he’s just screwed next year.
Did you indicate the fact that your school does not have advanced math in your cover letter. That was something I stressed , the lack of opportunity for challenge. It helped us
Anonymous wrote:Still not in with a 138 CoGAT and 99.8 percentiles on some of the subtests on WISC with a 136 FISQ. His Winter iReady was only like 80% in reading, but 99 in math. Our schook doesn’t start advanced math until 5th, so he’s just screwed next year.
Anonymous wrote:Surely harder to get in next year since those who hit it now are guaranteed spots, so unless they expand resources, one must have exceptional performance in third grade at all levels to force a decision
Anonymous wrote:My child had 128 Composite on CoGAT, 106 for NNAT, HOPE scale was "often" for most except two which were "almost always". Got rejected the first time so we appealed again with a WISC score of 136/99th percentile and very strong work samples and referral letter - got rejected again. We thought we had very strong chance given child's CoGAT and WISC scores and very strong work samples. We are so confused. Could it be the low NNAT score and the iReady scores that were submitted with the original application (74 for Math and 80 for reading)? Or was it the low HOPE scores from school?
Anonymous wrote:Just got our rejection. I’m the PP who got the Level II email yesterday so this makes sense 😔
Anonymous wrote:Does the review committee care about the GAI at all or is it only focused on the FSIQ? My DN was 137 on GAI but 130 on FSIQ. The assessment coordinator highlighted only the GAI in the summary report. I plan to get DN tested for 2e.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just received the email. DC is in.
Can you share info about what you did to get in? My kid got rejected after very high scores on everything! What grade is your child in?
Thanks.
Can I ask about what your Hope evaluation looked like?
Our son got in on appeal - sorry you got rejected and it sounds strange. Our original packet weak point was very clearly Hope. So we addressed that head-on in cover letter, as well as with WISC-V score, ADHD diagnosis information and a new and improved winter over fall CoGAT. We added new super AAP-focused samples and also a letter from his first grade teachers who asked to write one, saying they could not believe he wasnt accepted to begin with.
Who knows what did it. We are glad but sorry for you bc it seems hard to know what the yes/no factor. We are, however, not fans of Hope and its application.
We had very good scores initially (including perfect NNAT) but the Hope was not good, maybe terrible. We had a few meetings and found out more or less that our team low scored many kids on Hope. (They told us many kids got “never” for everything - ! - and the fact that our son was above that - with “sometimes” - was positive. But we knew it had to look terrible on the county evaluation end.)
I can deep dive into the - to us - wild standards they were using but I think the Hope scoring, esp in the rollout year here is the opposite of the intention- it holds kids back rather than includes them. We wonder if it is especially not great for kids who are not extra outgoing or are 2e. (We get that leadership is part of the AAP system in general.)
(Though it very well could be there are accepted cases that disprove this and we don’t see bc they got in w lower testing and high Hope and were happy/successful.)
Anyway, we - and our school team made us feel they don’t disagree - really have concerns about Hope.
What did that look like in your packet?
We never had one of those. I have 2 kids applying for AAP. One was 2nd grader with mediocre scores on tests but really good work output and work samples. The other was 5th grader with high scores on cogat (90th i believe) and wisc-v (91st), good writing samples etc, scored advanced math on SOL, high GBRS from teacher. Both were rejected so Im just confused on what they want. The AART teacher is no helpful in guiding what we should do.