Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 19:15     Subject: Re:Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:Truth.


Ken Burns, the film maker?
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 19:13     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Ken Burns has always been a liberal and has been quite upfront about it. It’s not like he is suddenly changing his tune for this election.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 19:11     Subject: Re:Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Truth.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 19:09     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You can't gaslight people into misremembering what happened, which was coordinated efforts by government (leaning hard on social media companies) to shut down discussion. People are not going to forget.


The FACT is that House Republicans tried to have hearings on that but UTTERLY FAILED to prove there was some massive coordinated leaning hard on social media to shut down discussion. You can check the actual CSPAN hearing video for yourself on how it was a failure. If whatever media you follow didn't convey that to you then you are looking in the wrong place for where discussion was shut down.


I don't need a congressional hearing to prove something I experienced personally.


That you posted some sketchy covid conspiracy crap and some mod deleted it (which nobody here denies) is hardly evidence of a grand government coverup. Again, the House Republicans tried proving that and failed. And if they failed in their fervent witch hunt, yours is also by extension a fail. Accept the L and move on. It was some random mod, not a government conspiracy. You do not know more than, or better than the people who had far more resources and access to investigate than you do.


That was a different poster.

People lived through a time when their lives were completely upended and day to day actions and personal health care decisions were dictated by government policies.

The decision to get a vaccine was foisted on people whose employers suddenly had to administer a vaccine mandate from the federal government. Quiting your job suddenly and losing income and stability for your family is not an option for many people. My employer never intruded on my healthcare decisions until Trump and Biden's administrations put in sweeping government covid policies.

People were understandably uncomfortable with a vaccine that was rushed through production and approved on an emergency use basis. Vaccines usually take decades to confirm safety and efficacy. I participated in vaccine trials in college that I learned literally 10 years later hadn't been approved. Then there was the ever changing promises that the vaccine would prevent transmission that were watered down to say, oh no, it'll prevent serious illness and or death. Most demographics were never going to die from covid anyway. It primarily affected the elderly.

Schools were closed, for quite a while, depending on the state. Young families were left to figure out how to work fulltime remotely while simultaneously homeschooling their kids while people screeched about how "school isn't childcare". It is, actually. Our entire economy relies on parents knowing their children are being supervised so the parents can work.

Small businesses were deemed nonessential and had to close while big businesses had the resources to lobby for different treatment.

You STILL have people who are trying to shut down discussion on the government pandemic response, years later.


The "different posters" are all part of the same disease affecting American society - that we are being destroyed from within with willful and malicious disinformation. Disinformation which caused huge numbers of Americans to get sick and die when it should have been preventable.

Meanwhile, nobody died because schools were closed. Nobody died because some message board mod shut down what was, at the time, baseless theories about a lab leak. And do note that school closures were largely a local decision.

Again, it's truly bizarre that people here on this thread, whether you or the different poster alike somehow arrive at the utterly bizarre calculus that somehow "Democrats are worse" or "Democrats are destroying society" when it wasn't the Democrats who were getting Americans killed by the thousands spreading anti-vax garbage.

If you still don't get it, then you're truly hopeless. People dying a horrible death from covid is FAR worse than you being butthurt because some mod locked or took down your post. That's just objective reality.


The law isn't about relativism. The federal government can't be censoring speech through a third-party, like Facebook, no matter how beneficial it would be to the American public.


And House Republicans tried to prove that the federal government was censoring, and failed. And by the way, the First Amendment doesn't actually give unconditional blanket protections and carte blanche to post whatever you like. For example if you post classified information you absolutely will be prosecuted and convicted. Likewise, in most US jurisdictions, it is unlawful to threaten to harm or kill people or destroy their property (terroristic threats), or to falsely hold yourself out to be a physician, police officer, or member of other regulated professions.

So you fail to make your case on the law piece, and you completely failed on the morality and relativism piece. Two fails for the price of one. Congratulations.


It's unclear to me how blind you can be:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/07/judge-rules-white-house-pressured-social-networks-to-suppress-free-speech/

Further, you seem to be claiming that covid theories are classified information. That's an interesting straw man but not what we are discussing.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 19:06     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

The gold standard Cochrane meta analysis of over 78 rigorous studies showed that mask mandates don’t work. “The review’s authors found “little to no” evidence that masking at the population level reduced COVID infections, concluding that there is “uncertainty about the effects of face masks.” That result held when the researchers compared surgical masks with N95 masks, and when they compared surgical masks with nothing.” (Tayag)

If you haven’t been following the science, then maybe just sit this discussion out.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:57     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you lost that pro science argument when the left went berserk during covid.


Covid killed more than a million Americans including members of my family. You think the status quo was called for during an extreme health crisis like that? Do you disrespect health care workers that much? Wow.


The decisions made during COVID by the left were indefensible from both scientific and moral standards. From shutting down the lab leak theory to the unscientific six foot distancing rule, to the closing of outdoor playgrounds and masking of two year olds, the destructive and useless extended school closures, unwillingness to acknowledge that cloth masks were not protective, to the forced admission of COVID positive patients into nursing homes, the mistakes and disregard of science go on and on.


The lab leak theory had no evidence to support it at the time. And just because it did later turn out to be true is nothing more than the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day. Not exactly a victory, nothing to crow about in terms of scientific or moral theories. What was far worse, far more detrimental and far more indefensible were people like YOU, PP

- the ones like the PP who ran around claiming COVID was a hoax, or that it was somehow being grossly exaggerated. That dishonest propaganda of yours led to disregard to public health guidance and actually contributed to higher transmission rates, it caused deeper divisions in society and deeper distrust in institutions, and hampered efforts to promote vaccinations and necessary public health measures. And don't deny it, PP - your post is dripping with it.

- the ones on your side who ran around touting bogus unscientific nonsense about miracle cures, like hodryxychloroquine, ivermectin, colloidal silver and other things, which distracted from effective treatment and prevention strategies, led to dangerous self-medication and misuse of drugs, and promoted a culture of skepticism toward scientific advice and evidence-based medicine

- the ones on your side who ran around claiming getting infected and having natural immunity would be superior to vaccination - a claim unsupported by science, and what resulted is that people did not protect themselves and even worse, in some cases intentionally exposed themselves, leading to what should otherwise been preventable illnesses and deaths. It undermined vaccination campaigns, and spread disinformation about the nature of immunity and vaccine effectiveness.

- the ones who falsely claimed the vaccines alter DNA, or contain microchips - completely unscientific, immoral garbage, which fueled vaccine hesitancy and slowed vaccination efforts, and prolonged the pandemic due to insufficient herd immunity, while also eroding trust in medical institutions and scientific research

- the ones who spread totally unscientific crap saying "it's being caused by 5G" - completely indefensible, and detrimental because it misdirected public concern away from actual transmission methods, led to vandalism of 5G towers and attacks on telecom workers, and fostered fear and confustion in the public.

The PP does not have a leg to stand on here. The stuff the PP's side did was far worse than anything the PP wants to whine about. That's an absolute fact.

People like the PP damaged the science of Medicine: The spread of misinformation undermined trust in healthcare professionals and public health directives. It also diverted resources to counter false claims and treat preventable cases.

People like the PP damaged science: Disinformation eroded public trust in scientific research and expertise. It contributed to a broader culture of skepticism towards scientific consensus and evidence-based practice.

People like the PP damaged society: The proliferation of conspiracy theories and disinformation led to social polarization, increased xenophobia, and a general erosion of trust in institutions and authorities. It also complicated efforts to manage the pandemic through collective action.

People like the PP damaged the economy: Persistent disinformation impacted economic recovery by prolonging the pandemic and necessitating longer periods of restrictive measures, which in turn hurt businesses and employment.

Completely inexcusable.


The fact that you jump to attack me personally for my completely factual post because you can’t defend anything I wrote - says everything. You know nothing about me or my politics, but the facts I presented here upset you so much that you jump to accusing me of damaging society. You have a lot of self reflection to do here. Your attacks are not going to persuade anyone that the above facts didn’t occur during the pandemic.

Next time, try to make a cogent argument.


You are correct, of course. But that poster you are responding to is largely here to demonstrate that the Republicans aren’t the only party with a deep base of lunatics in their ranks.


Oh, sure, I'm a complete lunatic for pointing out that people dying by the thousands because of conspiracy theories is worse than someone's bogus post being taken down.

Check yourself.
Far more people will die worldwide because of the shutdowns than from COVID. Aid to starving nations all but ceased because of financial and logistics issues cause by shutdowns. I know, I know. But mah saving democracy!


Give me a credible citation for how many Americans died because of shutdowns.


Per the link above, tens of thousands of Americans died unnecessarily because of anti-mask propaganda. That's in addition to all of the other Americans who died due to false anti-vax propaganda and other willfully sown distrust and divisiveness - virtually none of which was based on facts or science.

So you're going to have to come up with hundreds of thousands of Americans who according to you died because of the shutdown. Post your source.


Anti mask propaganda? Are you still living in 2021? Please brush up on what we know about the effects of mask mandates (hint: they were useless). It seems like you are about three years behind and still think the mandates were effective.


That's yet another false statement you've made. There are links to 4 or 5 papers and articles from scientific journals showing that masks and other public health measures were indeed effective. But I see you have posted zero links to back up your position, nor one to back up the wild claim about larger numbers of Americans dying because of shutdowns than died from anti-vax and other false, unscientific propaganda.


You can’t read. The PP said “mask mandates” not masks.

It’s been interesting watching the unhinged posts in this thread from people who claim to be pro-science but can’t even properly read DCUM posts. My confidence in your ability to understand scientific literature is low.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:44     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no science when the pandemic hit. The scientists were working off data from SARS and MERS, which were in the same family but never at a global scale of impact. We did lockdowns so that hospital wouldn’t get overwhelmed. I feel like a lot of conservative are making calls in hindsight with known data, which wasn’t available information in the Spring/summer of 2020. So yes looking back, they could have possibly changed a few actions, like having kids return in the fall of 2020 to schools.


That only explains the first couple of weeks of lockdowns, and not the behavior months and years afterwards. It doesn’t explain the very specific facts I mentioned about the lack of a scientific basis for example for extended school closures, distancing, mandated child vaccinations and cloth masking. The entire time those decisions were coming down, we had evidence out of European countries (that were managing things differently) that was discarded.


For all of the leftist worship of European socialism, they are remarkably good at frantically silencing the hard, solid science that comes out of those countries. They did it in the pandemic with respect to evidence concerning school closures and distancing, and they’re doing it now with respect to medicalized gender transition for children. It’s almost as if they want the socialist dream and propaganda without the accompanying state-sponsored science.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:38     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you lost that pro science argument when the left went berserk during covid.


Covid killed more than a million Americans including members of my family. You think the status quo was called for during an extreme health crisis like that? Do you disrespect health care workers that much? Wow.


The decisions made during COVID by the left were indefensible from both scientific and moral standards. From shutting down the lab leak theory to the unscientific six foot distancing rule, to the closing of outdoor playgrounds and masking of two year olds, the destructive and useless extended school closures, unwillingness to acknowledge that cloth masks were not protective, to the forced admission of COVID positive patients into nursing homes, the mistakes and disregard of science go on and on.


The lab leak theory had no evidence to support it at the time. And just because it did later turn out to be true is nothing more than the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day. Not exactly a victory, nothing to crow about in terms of scientific or moral theories. What was far worse, far more detrimental and far more indefensible were people like YOU, PP

- the ones like the PP who ran around claiming COVID was a hoax, or that it was somehow being grossly exaggerated. That dishonest propaganda of yours led to disregard to public health guidance and actually contributed to higher transmission rates, it caused deeper divisions in society and deeper distrust in institutions, and hampered efforts to promote vaccinations and necessary public health measures. And don't deny it, PP - your post is dripping with it.

- the ones on your side who ran around touting bogus unscientific nonsense about miracle cures, like hodryxychloroquine, ivermectin, colloidal silver and other things, which distracted from effective treatment and prevention strategies, led to dangerous self-medication and misuse of drugs, and promoted a culture of skepticism toward scientific advice and evidence-based medicine

- the ones on your side who ran around claiming getting infected and having natural immunity would be superior to vaccination - a claim unsupported by science, and what resulted is that people did not protect themselves and even worse, in some cases intentionally exposed themselves, leading to what should otherwise been preventable illnesses and deaths. It undermined vaccination campaigns, and spread disinformation about the nature of immunity and vaccine effectiveness.

- the ones who falsely claimed the vaccines alter DNA, or contain microchips - completely unscientific, immoral garbage, which fueled vaccine hesitancy and slowed vaccination efforts, and prolonged the pandemic due to insufficient herd immunity, while also eroding trust in medical institutions and scientific research

- the ones who spread totally unscientific crap saying "it's being caused by 5G" - completely indefensible, and detrimental because it misdirected public concern away from actual transmission methods, led to vandalism of 5G towers and attacks on telecom workers, and fostered fear and confustion in the public.

The PP does not have a leg to stand on here. The stuff the PP's side did was far worse than anything the PP wants to whine about. That's an absolute fact.

People like the PP damaged the science of Medicine: The spread of misinformation undermined trust in healthcare professionals and public health directives. It also diverted resources to counter false claims and treat preventable cases.

People like the PP damaged science: Disinformation eroded public trust in scientific research and expertise. It contributed to a broader culture of skepticism towards scientific consensus and evidence-based practice.

People like the PP damaged society: The proliferation of conspiracy theories and disinformation led to social polarization, increased xenophobia, and a general erosion of trust in institutions and authorities. It also complicated efforts to manage the pandemic through collective action.

People like the PP damaged the economy: Persistent disinformation impacted economic recovery by prolonging the pandemic and necessitating longer periods of restrictive measures, which in turn hurt businesses and employment.

Completely inexcusable.


The fact that you jump to attack me personally for my completely factual post because you can’t defend anything I wrote - says everything. You know nothing about me or my politics, but the facts I presented here upset you so much that you jump to accusing me of damaging society. You have a lot of self reflection to do here. Your attacks are not going to persuade anyone that the above facts didn’t occur during the pandemic.

Next time, try to make a cogent argument.


You are correct, of course. But that poster you are responding to is largely here to demonstrate that the Republicans aren’t the only party with a deep base of lunatics in their ranks.


Oh, sure, I'm a complete lunatic for pointing out that people dying by the thousands because of conspiracy theories is worse than someone's bogus post being taken down.

Check yourself.


Why on earth do you keep repeatedly talking about posts being taken down? Man, you sound so insane.

I feel like your posts do nothing other than show how the left has as many unhinged lunatics as the right.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:06     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Boops 9/11 NY First Responders
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:05     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you lost that pro science argument when the left went berserk during covid.


Covid killed more than a million Americans including members of my family. You think the status quo was called for during an extreme health crisis like that? Do you disrespect health care workers that much? Wow.


The decisions made during COVID by the left were indefensible from both scientific and moral standards. From shutting down the lab leak theory to the unscientific six foot distancing rule, to the closing of outdoor playgrounds and masking of two year olds, the destructive and useless extended school closures, unwillingness to acknowledge that cloth masks were not protective, to the forced admission of COVID positive patients into nursing homes, the mistakes and disregard of science go on and on.


The lab leak theory had no evidence to support it at the time. And just because it did later turn out to be true is nothing more than the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day. Not exactly a victory, nothing to crow about in terms of scientific or moral theories. What was far worse, far more detrimental and far more indefensible were people like YOU, PP

- the ones like the PP who ran around claiming COVID was a hoax, or that it was somehow being grossly exaggerated. That dishonest propaganda of yours led to disregard to public health guidance and actually contributed to higher transmission rates, it caused deeper divisions in society and deeper distrust in institutions, and hampered efforts to promote vaccinations and necessary public health measures. And don't deny it, PP - your post is dripping with it.

- the ones on your side who ran around touting bogus unscientific nonsense about miracle cures, like hodryxychloroquine, ivermectin, colloidal silver and other things, which distracted from effective treatment and prevention strategies, led to dangerous self-medication and misuse of drugs, and promoted a culture of skepticism toward scientific advice and evidence-based medicine

- the ones on your side who ran around claiming getting infected and having natural immunity would be superior to vaccination - a claim unsupported by science, and what resulted is that people did not protect themselves and even worse, in some cases intentionally exposed themselves, leading to what should otherwise been preventable illnesses and deaths. It undermined vaccination campaigns, and spread disinformation about the nature of immunity and vaccine effectiveness.

- the ones who falsely claimed the vaccines alter DNA, or contain microchips - completely unscientific, immoral garbage, which fueled vaccine hesitancy and slowed vaccination efforts, and prolonged the pandemic due to insufficient herd immunity, while also eroding trust in medical institutions and scientific research

- the ones who spread totally unscientific crap saying "it's being caused by 5G" - completely indefensible, and detrimental because it misdirected public concern away from actual transmission methods, led to vandalism of 5G towers and attacks on telecom workers, and fostered fear and confustion in the public.

The PP does not have a leg to stand on here. The stuff the PP's side did was far worse than anything the PP wants to whine about. That's an absolute fact.

People like the PP damaged the science of Medicine: The spread of misinformation undermined trust in healthcare professionals and public health directives. It also diverted resources to counter false claims and treat preventable cases.

People like the PP damaged science: Disinformation eroded public trust in scientific research and expertise. It contributed to a broader culture of skepticism towards scientific consensus and evidence-based practice.

People like the PP damaged society: The proliferation of conspiracy theories and disinformation led to social polarization, increased xenophobia, and a general erosion of trust in institutions and authorities. It also complicated efforts to manage the pandemic through collective action.

People like the PP damaged the economy: Persistent disinformation impacted economic recovery by prolonging the pandemic and necessitating longer periods of restrictive measures, which in turn hurt businesses and employment.

Completely inexcusable.


The fact that you jump to attack me personally for my completely factual post because you can’t defend anything I wrote - says everything. You know nothing about me or my politics, but the facts I presented here upset you so much that you jump to accusing me of damaging society. You have a lot of self reflection to do here. Your attacks are not going to persuade anyone that the above facts didn’t occur during the pandemic.

Next time, try to make a cogent argument.


You are correct, of course. But that poster you are responding to is largely here to demonstrate that the Republicans aren’t the only party with a deep base of lunatics in their ranks.


Oh, sure, I'm a complete lunatic for pointing out that people dying by the thousands because of conspiracy theories is worse than someone's bogus post being taken down.

Check yourself.
Far more people will die worldwide because of the shutdowns than from COVID. Aid to starving nations all but ceased because of financial and logistics issues cause by shutdowns. I know, I know. But mah saving democracy!


Give me a credible citation for how many Americans died because of shutdowns.


Per the link above, tens of thousands of Americans died unnecessarily because of anti-mask propaganda. That's in addition to all of the other Americans who died due to false anti-vax propaganda and other willfully sown distrust and divisiveness - virtually none of which was based on facts or science.

So you're going to have to come up with hundreds of thousands of Americans who according to you died because of the shutdown. Post your source.


Anti mask propaganda? Are you still living in 2021? Please brush up on what we know about the effects of mask mandates (hint: they were useless). It seems like you are about three years behind and still think the mandates were effective.


Monday morning quarterbacking is lame, folks.


Claiming to be the party of science with this type of record is what is lame.
b

Lame is standing with Don the con two bit hustler from queens who not only killed over a million Americans with his lies but also profited off their deaths

Spare us your stupidity you don’t know what science is!

Leave the US no American support s the guy that calls our military losers and suckers.

No American supports the guy that stole from NY 9/22 first responders in ny . And learn to read Republican voting records are in line they vote no on broader, police, law enforcement, veterans and food food children while they stuff their is. Pockets.

Facts matter here. The Republican Party is 100 percent unamerican!
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 18:00     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There was no science when the pandemic hit. The scientists were working off data from SARS and MERS, which were in the same family but never at a global scale of impact. We did lockdowns so that hospital wouldn’t get overwhelmed. I feel like a lot of conservative are making calls in hindsight with known data, which wasn’t available information in the Spring/summer of 2020. So yes looking back, they could have possibly changed a few actions, like having kids return in the fall of 2020 to schools.


That only explains the first couple of weeks of lockdowns, and not the behavior months and years afterwards. It doesn’t explain the very specific facts I mentioned about the lack of a scientific basis for example for extended school closures, distancing, mandated child vaccinations and cloth masking. The entire time those decisions were coming down, we had evidence out of European countries (that were managing things differently) that was discarded.


Besides the fact you are literally stupid. We had a novel virus no one in the world knew what to do. We then had a bumbling fool for a president he would have let more die you moron.

A Trump or any Republican Adminsis not about Covid at this point you complete and utter moron!

It is about the US being taken over by a dictatorship how is this hard to understand???
We are the US we live under the Constitution we do not install Kings if you want that move to Russia but I will be dammed that the Republican part of Neo Maxis and religious zealots are going to take my vote and install a King

Again WTH are you not understanding ??

We are not going to live in Trump land we are not going to live in Magadonia we have term limits you idiots!

I will be dammed if my family died for this treasonous facist shit!

Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 17:57     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you lost that pro science argument when the left went berserk during covid.


Covid killed more than a million Americans including members of my family. You think the status quo was called for during an extreme health crisis like that? Do you disrespect health care workers that much? Wow.


The decisions made during COVID by the left were indefensible from both scientific and moral standards. From shutting down the lab leak theory to the unscientific six foot distancing rule, to the closing of outdoor playgrounds and masking of two year olds, the destructive and useless extended school closures, unwillingness to acknowledge that cloth masks were not protective, to the forced admission of COVID positive patients into nursing homes, the mistakes and disregard of science go on and on.


The lab leak theory had no evidence to support it at the time. And just because it did later turn out to be true is nothing more than the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day. Not exactly a victory, nothing to crow about in terms of scientific or moral theories. What was far worse, far more detrimental and far more indefensible were people like YOU, PP

- the ones like the PP who ran around claiming COVID was a hoax, or that it was somehow being grossly exaggerated. That dishonest propaganda of yours led to disregard to public health guidance and actually contributed to higher transmission rates, it caused deeper divisions in society and deeper distrust in institutions, and hampered efforts to promote vaccinations and necessary public health measures. And don't deny it, PP - your post is dripping with it.

- the ones on your side who ran around touting bogus unscientific nonsense about miracle cures, like hodryxychloroquine, ivermectin, colloidal silver and other things, which distracted from effective treatment and prevention strategies, led to dangerous self-medication and misuse of drugs, and promoted a culture of skepticism toward scientific advice and evidence-based medicine

- the ones on your side who ran around claiming getting infected and having natural immunity would be superior to vaccination - a claim unsupported by science, and what resulted is that people did not protect themselves and even worse, in some cases intentionally exposed themselves, leading to what should otherwise been preventable illnesses and deaths. It undermined vaccination campaigns, and spread disinformation about the nature of immunity and vaccine effectiveness.

- the ones who falsely claimed the vaccines alter DNA, or contain microchips - completely unscientific, immoral garbage, which fueled vaccine hesitancy and slowed vaccination efforts, and prolonged the pandemic due to insufficient herd immunity, while also eroding trust in medical institutions and scientific research

- the ones who spread totally unscientific crap saying "it's being caused by 5G" - completely indefensible, and detrimental because it misdirected public concern away from actual transmission methods, led to vandalism of 5G towers and attacks on telecom workers, and fostered fear and confustion in the public.

The PP does not have a leg to stand on here. The stuff the PP's side did was far worse than anything the PP wants to whine about. That's an absolute fact.

People like the PP damaged the science of Medicine: The spread of misinformation undermined trust in healthcare professionals and public health directives. It also diverted resources to counter false claims and treat preventable cases.

People like the PP damaged science: Disinformation eroded public trust in scientific research and expertise. It contributed to a broader culture of skepticism towards scientific consensus and evidence-based practice.

People like the PP damaged society: The proliferation of conspiracy theories and disinformation led to social polarization, increased xenophobia, and a general erosion of trust in institutions and authorities. It also complicated efforts to manage the pandemic through collective action.

People like the PP damaged the economy: Persistent disinformation impacted economic recovery by prolonging the pandemic and necessitating longer periods of restrictive measures, which in turn hurt businesses and employment.

Completely inexcusable.


The fact that you jump to attack me personally for my completely factual post because you can’t defend anything I wrote - says everything. You know nothing about me or my politics, but the facts I presented here upset you so much that you jump to accusing me of damaging society. You have a lot of self reflection to do here. Your attacks are not going to persuade anyone that the above facts didn’t occur during the pandemic.

Next time, try to make a cogent argument.


You are correct, of course. But that poster you are responding to is largely here to demonstrate that the Republicans aren’t the only party with a deep base of lunatics in their ranks.


Oh, sure, I'm a complete lunatic for pointing out that people dying by the thousands because of conspiracy theories is worse than someone's bogus post being taken down.

Check yourself.
Far more people will die worldwide because of the shutdowns than from COVID. Aid to starving nations all but ceased because of financial and logistics issues cause by shutdowns. I know, I know. But mah saving democracy!


Give me a credible citation for how many Americans died because of shutdowns.


Per the link above, tens of thousands of Americans died unnecessarily because of anti-mask propaganda. That's in addition to all of the other Americans who died due to false anti-vax propaganda and other willfully sown distrust and divisiveness - virtually none of which was based on facts or science.

So you're going to have to come up with hundreds of thousands of Americans who according to you died because of the shutdown. Post your source.


Anti mask propaganda? Are you still living in 2021? Please brush up on what we know about the effects of mask mandates (hint: they were useless). It seems like you are about three years behind and still think the mandates were effective.


That's yet another false statement you've made. There are links to 4 or 5 papers and articles from scientific journals showing that masks and other public health measures were indeed effective. But I see you have posted zero links to back up your position, nor one to back up the wild claim about larger numbers of Americans dying because of shutdowns than died from anti-vax and other false, unscientific propaganda.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 17:55     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:We have a lot of stupid people in the US.


+1

And they are not getting how horrible an Facist regime will be.
Ugh
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 17:25     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yeah, you lost that pro science argument when the left went berserk during covid.


Covid killed more than a million Americans including members of my family. You think the status quo was called for during an extreme health crisis like that? Do you disrespect health care workers that much? Wow.


The decisions made during COVID by the left were indefensible from both scientific and moral standards. From shutting down the lab leak theory to the unscientific six foot distancing rule, to the closing of outdoor playgrounds and masking of two year olds, the destructive and useless extended school closures, unwillingness to acknowledge that cloth masks were not protective, to the forced admission of COVID positive patients into nursing homes, the mistakes and disregard of science go on and on.


The lab leak theory had no evidence to support it at the time. And just because it did later turn out to be true is nothing more than the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day. Not exactly a victory, nothing to crow about in terms of scientific or moral theories. What was far worse, far more detrimental and far more indefensible were people like YOU, PP

- the ones like the PP who ran around claiming COVID was a hoax, or that it was somehow being grossly exaggerated. That dishonest propaganda of yours led to disregard to public health guidance and actually contributed to higher transmission rates, it caused deeper divisions in society and deeper distrust in institutions, and hampered efforts to promote vaccinations and necessary public health measures. And don't deny it, PP - your post is dripping with it.

- the ones on your side who ran around touting bogus unscientific nonsense about miracle cures, like hodryxychloroquine, ivermectin, colloidal silver and other things, which distracted from effective treatment and prevention strategies, led to dangerous self-medication and misuse of drugs, and promoted a culture of skepticism toward scientific advice and evidence-based medicine

- the ones on your side who ran around claiming getting infected and having natural immunity would be superior to vaccination - a claim unsupported by science, and what resulted is that people did not protect themselves and even worse, in some cases intentionally exposed themselves, leading to what should otherwise been preventable illnesses and deaths. It undermined vaccination campaigns, and spread disinformation about the nature of immunity and vaccine effectiveness.

- the ones who falsely claimed the vaccines alter DNA, or contain microchips - completely unscientific, immoral garbage, which fueled vaccine hesitancy and slowed vaccination efforts, and prolonged the pandemic due to insufficient herd immunity, while also eroding trust in medical institutions and scientific research

- the ones who spread totally unscientific crap saying "it's being caused by 5G" - completely indefensible, and detrimental because it misdirected public concern away from actual transmission methods, led to vandalism of 5G towers and attacks on telecom workers, and fostered fear and confustion in the public.

The PP does not have a leg to stand on here. The stuff the PP's side did was far worse than anything the PP wants to whine about. That's an absolute fact.

People like the PP damaged the science of Medicine: The spread of misinformation undermined trust in healthcare professionals and public health directives. It also diverted resources to counter false claims and treat preventable cases.

People like the PP damaged science: Disinformation eroded public trust in scientific research and expertise. It contributed to a broader culture of skepticism towards scientific consensus and evidence-based practice.

People like the PP damaged society: The proliferation of conspiracy theories and disinformation led to social polarization, increased xenophobia, and a general erosion of trust in institutions and authorities. It also complicated efforts to manage the pandemic through collective action.

People like the PP damaged the economy: Persistent disinformation impacted economic recovery by prolonging the pandemic and necessitating longer periods of restrictive measures, which in turn hurt businesses and employment.

Completely inexcusable.


The fact that you jump to attack me personally for my completely factual post because you can’t defend anything I wrote - says everything. You know nothing about me or my politics, but the facts I presented here upset you so much that you jump to accusing me of damaging society. You have a lot of self reflection to do here. Your attacks are not going to persuade anyone that the above facts didn’t occur during the pandemic.

Next time, try to make a cogent argument.


You are correct, of course. But that poster you are responding to is largely here to demonstrate that the Republicans aren’t the only party with a deep base of lunatics in their ranks.


Oh, sure, I'm a complete lunatic for pointing out that people dying by the thousands because of conspiracy theories is worse than someone's bogus post being taken down.

Check yourself.
Far more people will die worldwide because of the shutdowns than from COVID. Aid to starving nations all but ceased because of financial and logistics issues cause by shutdowns. I know, I know. But mah saving democracy!


Give me a credible citation for how many Americans died because of shutdowns.


Per the link above, tens of thousands of Americans died unnecessarily because of anti-mask propaganda. That's in addition to all of the other Americans who died due to false anti-vax propaganda and other willfully sown distrust and divisiveness - virtually none of which was based on facts or science.

So you're going to have to come up with hundreds of thousands of Americans who according to you died because of the shutdown. Post your source.


Anti mask propaganda? Are you still living in 2021? Please brush up on what we know about the effects of mask mandates (hint: they were useless). It seems like you are about three years behind and still think the mandates were effective.


Monday morning quarterbacking is lame, folks.


Claiming to be the party of science with this type of record is what is lame.
Anonymous
Post 05/26/2024 17:25     Subject: Is there a "post-truth" majority in the US?

Anonymous wrote:There was no science when the pandemic hit. The scientists were working off data from SARS and MERS, which were in the same family but never at a global scale of impact. We did lockdowns so that hospital wouldn’t get overwhelmed. I feel like a lot of conservative are making calls in hindsight with known data, which wasn’t available information in the Spring/summer of 2020. So yes looking back, they could have possibly changed a few actions, like having kids return in the fall of 2020 to schools.


That only explains the first couple of weeks of lockdowns, and not the behavior months and years afterwards. It doesn’t explain the very specific facts I mentioned about the lack of a scientific basis for example for extended school closures, distancing, mandated child vaccinations and cloth masking. The entire time those decisions were coming down, we had evidence out of European countries (that were managing things differently) that was discarded.