Anonymous wrote:You want me to be honest? Deep down -- I find it pathetic. But I would never say that out loud.
Anonymous wrote:
I assume what you are talking about is being content as a SAHM, because you assume all they are doing is being a wife and mother. They aren't; they are also doing tons of other stuff if they are actually happy. It's probably just not stuff that impresses you.
Anonymous wrote:
You mean people like me, who are very well-read, can discuss most current events with intelligence and some background knowledge, and also earn significant passive income from my dividends?
I'm doing great, thank you. Feel free to think whatever you want about me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You mean people like me, who are very well-read, can discuss most current events with intelligence and some background knowledge, and also earn significant passive income from my dividends?
I'm doing great, thank you. Feel free to think whatever you want about me.
That fact that you replied sort of indicates you care what people think.
I only judge those that do not contribute in any way to society - volunteer work, pta, kids activities, anything. If all they do is care for their kids, then I judge them as incredibly selfish and lazy.
No one cares what you think.
Raising well-adjusted kids is the single best thing someone can do for society.
That’s a pretty low bar.
Anonymous wrote:^ Also, anecdotal but of the three SAHM families I know well, the kids are super close to the SAHM and not at all to the WOHD. With the dual working parent families I know, there is a balance in terms of attachment. Kids will gravitate to mom for one thing and to dad for another. Dad knows how to keep things going while mom is traveling or out for dinner with friends.
Anonymous wrote:I would have been a SAHM if I didn’t have local, involved grandparents + ability to afford a FT nanny for school-aged kids. No question about that.
I only dislike the ones who enable their spouses to be workaholics and set a workaholic culture in the office. No, even the breadwinner should contribute to home and family needs.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not for me, but if it works for them why should I care? It’s not PC to say so but I think there were a lot of societal benefits to the one parent work, one parent home model of the middle class white 1950s world. I don’t want that personally but I can see how it was probably good for society overall, though at the expense of individuals who didn’t like it. If people have the means to replicate that and are happy doing it, good for them. Neither is true for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get zero fulfillment from work personally, none. I do it for the money. I would feel fantastic having more time to workout, read, paint, garden...To me that is a much fuller life than mine now. I assume most women who are "just wives and moms" have such hobbies in addition to taking care of their families.
Yep
Anonymous wrote:Do the people judging women have a problem with men who stay home?