Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Totally believe this. Sometimes it is the emotional/logistical strain rather than finances.
FWIW we have 3 and would’ve had 4 if we had more $$. Different strokes.
I have 3 kids. I would have had a 4th or even a 5th if I was younger. I had my first at 30 (almost 31) and my third at age 38 (almost 39). I was 40 with a toddler. Now I am 45 and would totally be able to care for another but I’m obviously too old now.
Wow those are big age gaps!
3.5 years is a big age gap? I think smaller gaps are more common now because people are cramming two kids in in their mid to late thirties. When I was growing up in the 90s, 3-4 year age gaps were very common. I have a 3 year gap between my kids. Might go for a third with the same spacing. I like it from a developmental and staggering standpoint.
DP. I don’t think that’s a big age gap. But it’s a little bit self-selecting probably because I felt like all my friends in the 90s had 2 year gaps!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Totally believe this. Sometimes it is the emotional/logistical strain rather than finances.
FWIW we have 3 and would’ve had 4 if we had more $$. Different strokes.
I have 3 kids. I would have had a 4th or even a 5th if I was younger. I had my first at 30 (almost 31) and my third at age 38 (almost 39). I was 40 with a toddler. Now I am 45 and would totally be able to care for another but I’m obviously too old now.
Wow those are big age gaps!
3.5 years is a big age gap? I think smaller gaps are more common now because people are cramming two kids in in their mid to late thirties. When I was growing up in the 90s, 3-4 year age gaps were very common. I have a 3 year gap between my kids. Might go for a third with the same spacing. I like it from a developmental and staggering standpoint.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Totally believe this. Sometimes it is the emotional/logistical strain rather than finances.
FWIW we have 3 and would’ve had 4 if we had more $$. Different strokes.
I have 3 kids. I would have had a 4th or even a 5th if I was younger. I had my first at 30 (almost 31) and my third at age 38 (almost 39). I was 40 with a toddler. Now I am 45 and would totally be able to care for another but I’m obviously too old now.
Wow those are big age gaps!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Totally believe this. Sometimes it is the emotional/logistical strain rather than finances.
FWIW we have 3 and would’ve had 4 if we had more $$. Different strokes.
I have 3 kids. I would have had a 4th or even a 5th if I was younger. I had my first at 30 (almost 31) and my third at age 38 (almost 39). I was 40 with a toddler. Now I am 45 and would totally be able to care for another but I’m obviously too old now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Totally believe this. Sometimes it is the emotional/logistical strain rather than finances.
FWIW we have 3 and would’ve had 4 if we had more $$. Different strokes.
Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have 3 and live in a MC suburban neighborhood. It does seem like more MC people around me are having 3. I imagine a lot of this has to do with where we live; very family friendly, more affordable but safe, strong community etc.
This is just to say, while wealthy people may also be having 3 or 4 and can afford to in major metro areas, I think other groups are also doing this by settling in areas where they can comfortably raise 3 kids.
+1
Without family help or a SAHP, 3 kids is a ton of work and stress, anywhere you live.
I actually don’t feel this way. Kids are always work but I genuinely don’t feel super stressed by raising 3. I live in a much more low key area than the DC metro area though. Where we live there isn’t a lot of pressure to do private school, extra tutoring, daily scheduled activities etc. I’m sure it would be very stressful trying to do all of this without a lot of support or money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have 3 and live in a MC suburban neighborhood. It does seem like more MC people around me are having 3. I imagine a lot of this has to do with where we live; very family friendly, more affordable but safe, strong community etc.
This is just to say, while wealthy people may also be having 3 or 4 and can afford to in major metro areas, I think other groups are also doing this by settling in areas where they can comfortably raise 3 kids.
+1
Without family help or a SAHP, 3 kids is a ton of work and stress, anywhere you live.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How you space them makes a difference. Families with 3 very close together (3 within 5 years) usually end up with a SAHP, from what I've seen.
Or sometimes the opposite- a family with SAHP parent sometimes has kids close together to minimize the number of years out of the workforce…
Anonymous wrote:How you space them makes a difference. Families with 3 very close together (3 within 5 years) usually end up with a SAHP, from what I've seen.
Anonymous wrote:None of my friends with two kids would have one more if they had more money. The one or two kids they have are completely emotionally draining for them. Same for me! As for acquaintances/casual friendships, I have no idea because we don't talk about those kinds of personal things.