Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
It's truly amazing how everyone is vigorously defending taking down the statue of William Penn, the epitome of a moral American, as a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
It's truly amazing how everyone is vigorously defending taking down the statue of William Penn, the epitome of a moral American, as a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
It's truly amazing how everyone is vigorously defending taking down the statue of William Penn, the epitome of a moral American, as a good thing.
Or simply moving it to turn a mediocre space into something more exciting.
Would you like it in your back yard? Why don't you suggest that, the NPS is taking comments now as they decide how to improve the space!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
It's truly amazing how everyone is vigorously defending taking down the statue of William Penn, the epitome of a moral American, as a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
It's truly amazing how everyone is vigorously defending taking down the statue of William Penn, the epitome of a moral American, as a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
Anonymous wrote:It is an ugly park design from the 1980s. I'm sure whatever they replace it with will be much nicer and far more welcoming.
And, no, OP, they are not "cancelling" William Penn from PENNsylvania. The faux outrage over this is stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you been to that "park"? (It's not really a park, it's a plaza between buildings) It's been in need of work by the National Park Service for years, and the addition of exhibits describing the importance of the location to both the native people and the Europeans who settled there is a good thing.
And about the statue - it's a small copy of the 37-foot statue of Penn which is on top of Philadelphia's City Hall building. So calm yourself, no one is being "canceled."
https://www.associationforpublicart.org/artwork/william-penn/
I knew there would some context that the hair on fire freak out conservatives weren’t aware of.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you been to that "park"? (It's not really a park, it's a plaza between buildings) It's been in need of work by the National Park Service for years, and the addition of exhibits describing the importance of the location to both the native people and the Europeans who settled there is a good thing.
And about the statue - it's a small copy of the 37-foot statue of Penn which is on top of Philadelphia's City Hall building. So calm yourself, no one is being "canceled."
https://www.associationforpublicart.org/artwork/william-penn/
No. It’s the ONLY site in the city dedicated to the life and ideas of its founder.
According to PP:
So it turns out at least part of the site was land given by grandson John Penn to the Haudenosaunee "in perpetuity" for their diplomatic and trade delegations. This is based on both Quaker and Native American historical records.
As a Quaker, Penn would abhor having a site like this dedicated to himself. It’s not modest.
Sounds like the park is modest, isn't that the complaint? Too boring?
It isn’t the quality of the park he’d reject it’s the entire notion of having a park dedicated to him with his effigy in the middle of it. Have you ever been inside a Quaker meeting house? (That’s what they call their “churches”—since you seem unfamiliar with Quakerism.)
There's Quakers and then there's Quakers.
Anyway, he founded a state. That's inescapable, no matter how modest he might have wanted to be. Or how much some want to deny/downplay it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you been to that "park"? (It's not really a park, it's a plaza between buildings) It's been in need of work by the National Park Service for years, and the addition of exhibits describing the importance of the location to both the native people and the Europeans who settled there is a good thing.
And about the statue - it's a small copy of the 37-foot statue of Penn which is on top of Philadelphia's City Hall building. So calm yourself, no one is being "canceled."
https://www.associationforpublicart.org/artwork/william-penn/
No. It’s the ONLY site in the city dedicated to the life and ideas of its founder.
According to PP:
So it turns out at least part of the site was land given by grandson John Penn to the Haudenosaunee "in perpetuity" for their diplomatic and trade delegations. This is based on both Quaker and Native American historical records.
As a Quaker, Penn would abhor having a site like this dedicated to himself. It’s not modest.
Sounds like the park is modest, isn't that the complaint? Too boring?
It isn’t the quality of the park he’d reject it’s the entire notion of having a park dedicated to him with his effigy in the middle of it. Have you ever been inside a Quaker meeting house? (That’s what they call their “churches”—since you seem unfamiliar with Quakerism.)