Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a lot of high quality suitors when I was single and in my twenties.
I am naturally thin with large breasts. I have a pretty face, nice legs and great hair. I’m ivy educated. I always look polished. I wasn’t the prettiest but I was able to attract and more importantly keep the guys. I’m pleasant and a good conversationalist.
So if you are pretty, nice figure, smart and well educated, you are a good catch.
All of those are important, but I'd prefer a state university gal over ivy educated.
Why? Intimidated by women's intelligence or success?
You sound lovely. Plenty of intelligent and successful people go to state schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smart, pretty and nice. that is what most men want. Problem is that they will want top 20% and that leaves the remaining 80%.
No, but thanks for totally ignoring the majority of men who don’t resemble _your_ prince. “Absolutely every man passes me over! Oh them? They don’t count.”
Anonymous wrote:Smart, pretty and nice. that is what most men want. Problem is that they will want top 20% and that leaves the remaining 80%.
Anonymous wrote:Same for a woman. Combination of looks, motivation, independence, work ethic and devotion to other person Each factor is both defined and weighed differently depending on who is doing the evaluation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve seen people on here reference “well-educated” several times as a trait of above average value women but what does that mean? College? Some grad school? JD or MBA? Does where you went to school matter at all?
I consider well educated as degrees that are somewhat prestigious like a JD from Yale or masters from Harvard.
I would not describe someone as well educated if she went to a large state school and majored in communications. There is absolutely nothing wrong with going to a big state school but it is not someone I would describe as well educated.
So UVA grads are not well educated to you?
Correct. An average education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a lot of high quality suitors when I was single and in my twenties.
I am naturally thin with large breasts. I have a pretty face, nice legs and great hair. I’m ivy educated. I always look polished. I wasn’t the prettiest but I was able to attract and more importantly keep the guys. I’m pleasant and a good conversationalist.
So if you are pretty, nice figure, smart and well educated, you are a good catch.
All of those are important, but I'd prefer a state university gal over ivy educated.
Why? Intimidated by women's intelligence or success?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had a lot of high quality suitors when I was single and in my twenties.
I am naturally thin with large breasts. I have a pretty face, nice legs and great hair. I’m ivy educated. I always look polished. I wasn’t the prettiest but I was able to attract and more importantly keep the guys. I’m pleasant and a good conversationalist.
So if you are pretty, nice figure, smart and well educated, you are a good catch.
Humble much?
Anonymous wrote:I’ve seen people on here reference “well-educated” several times as a trait of above average value women but what does that mean? College? Some grad school? JD or MBA? Does where you went to school matter at all?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve seen people on here reference “well-educated” several times as a trait of above average value women but what does that mean? College? Some grad school? JD or MBA? Does where you went to school matter at all?
I consider well educated as degrees that are somewhat prestigious like a JD from Yale or masters from Harvard.
I would not describe someone as well educated if she went to a large state school and majored in communications. There is absolutely nothing wrong with going to a big state school but it is not someone I would describe as well educated.
So UVA grads are not well educated to you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm short but that's never kept me out of the running. All my bf's have been over 6'2"
Tall men like little women.
Until they have short sons. The keening and wailing about short sons in this site. People seem not to understand DNA.
The smart ones know little women mean much shorter sons.
No the dads height cancels that out. Tall men and short women getting together is biological
I know lots of 6 foot plus guys married to the 5-2 or 5-3 woman. The sons usually don’t even hit 6 feet. The husbands height does not cancel it out. They have sons shorter than they are, on average. Of course there are exceptions.
So common. Dad is 6-2, mom is 5-2. Everyone is shocked son is 5-8. It’s not shocking.