Anonymous wrote:A social worker or other services won't make a difference in their behavior. They aren't living under their supervision. The DC government, including their social workers behave and talk just like the voucher tenants.
They need to re-house them in a special community of high rises with police, mental health doctors, and drug counselors. This way they are contained in their own community away from the public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi everyone, my mom has lived in an apartment building in NorthWest DC for almost a decade now. Over the last two years several new people have moved into the building into new rent controlled units that the city decided the apartment complex must have. Recently two families have started having violent confrontations in the lobby together. My mom was walking into the lobby earlier this week when a fight broke out culminating in a woman beaten with a “Please sign in” metal sign and a knife being pulled. My mom was terrified and ran but now I worry that next time it could be a gun. My question is, does she have any legal recourse on recovering her security deposit and moving out given as how this is only the most recent incident in a series of violent incidents? Also there is no security guard only a front desk concierge.
Tldr; mom lives in building with new violent tenants can she get her security deposit back and move?
The above was posted on Reddit. Comments asked if this was The Brandywine.
The police report for the incident that is the subject of the thread stated that 2 females, known to one another, got into a fight and stabbed one another in the back. (Literally.) Both refused transport to the hospital. So, could, in fact, have been The Brandywine his mom lives in. Plenty of other options in Connecticut and Wisconsin corridors but there is a lot of violence INSIDE The Brandywine. Used to be so many Murch families.
I think if people with vouchers commit crimes or behave violently, they should lose the voucher and the apartment. if they have a mental illness they should be moved to places that can help them (group homes with staff onside to help with medications or mental hospitals where they cannot go out for people who are violent and a threat to themselves or others). if not, they should be kicked out of the apartment period. even assuming that housing is a right (and it's a big if), living at the taxpayer expense with 150% the already high rent in the best part of town is definitely not a right. I am sure there are plenty of lower income families that would love some help to live in the apartments on Wisconsin or CT and send their kids to local schools and that stab each other in the lobby when they have a disagreement, throw the girlfriend out of the 8th floor window or shoot around at 3pm on Saturday near a play ground. I came to DC in 2001 and rented for 10 yrs apartments on CT, first as a couple and then as a couple with two kids, lived in two different buildings and it was great.
Anonymous wrote:Hi everyone, my mom has lived in an apartment building in NorthWest DC for almost a decade now. Over the last two years several new people have moved into the building into new rent controlled units that the city decided the apartment complex must have. Recently two families have started having violent confrontations in the lobby together. My mom was walking into the lobby earlier this week when a fight broke out culminating in a woman beaten with a “Please sign in” metal sign and a knife being pulled. My mom was terrified and ran but now I worry that next time it could be a gun. My question is, does she have any legal recourse on recovering her security deposit and moving out given as how this is only the most recent incident in a series of violent incidents? Also there is no security guard only a front desk concierge.
Tldr; mom lives in building with new violent tenants can she get her security deposit back and move?
The above was posted on Reddit. Comments asked if this was The Brandywine.
The police report for the incident that is the subject of the thread stated that 2 females, known to one another, got into a fight and stabbed one another in the back. (Literally.) Both refused transport to the hospital. So, could, in fact, have been The Brandywine his mom lives in. Plenty of other options in Connecticut and Wisconsin corridors but there is a lot of violence INSIDE The Brandywine. Used to be so many Murch families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, we need a full campaign to make GGW a dirty word. That group has done so much damage.
Is that the group Nadeau's husband works for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, we need a full campaign to make GGW a dirty word. That group has done so much damage.
Is that the group Nadeau's husband works for?
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, we need a full campaign to make GGW a dirty word. That group has done so much damage.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, we need a full campaign to make GGW a dirty word. That group has done so much damage.
Anonymous wrote:I went back and looked at campaign issues in the last Ward 3 election. Crime was not even listed as an issue. That tells you how quickly things have spiralled out of control.
People, we need candidates! Retirees are great for this - they have plenty of time to give. Talk to your wise neighbors and colleagues, please!!