Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Favorites: Labradors, German Shepherds, and Dachshunds
Don’t like: Goldendoodles, Yorkies, and Poodles
Favorite: GS, Beagles, Yorkies, Bichon, Cavalier types. Most big dogs.
Dislike: Anything drooly, anything that sheds or poodles/poodle mixes.
Also, most pits are good - it is the owners of some dogs (big and small) that are awful and irresponsible.
So are you saying that pitts have such awful, irresponsible owners that mauling/killing is reasonable "misbehavior" from a dog?
I seriously doubt that these parents were so awful, they trained their pitts to kill their own children
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/tennessee-mom-in-hospital-after-trying-to-save-her-two-young-children-from-fatal-family-dog-mauling/
That the owners of this dog trained it to kill children?
https://people.com/florida-boy-mauled-death-pit-bull-mix-7560578
Or that the grandma trained this dog to kill her grandson?
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dog-kills-2-year-old-virginia-boy-in-maryland
If I were to be an "awful, irresponsible owner", and decide to stop training my dog for so long she decides to go on a rampage, she's likely to jump on the table and steal food, rummage through the trash, bark for way too long at random people that walk by my house, and chew my kids' toys. No matter how much I ignore her, or let her stop respecting boundaries, or neglect training her, she will not kill or maul people. I would never do that, but if I did she'd be horrible to live with, but she is not a killer. I don't have to train her to not maul people, just like those other owners did not have to train their pitts to kill their children. It is normal for untrained dogs to jump, bark, steal food, chase cars, chew toys, dig holes, etc... It is not normal for untrained dogs to kill/maim people, no matter how awful or irresponsible the owners are.
You'll never get a good faith response to this, though the stats don't lie. You'll get some BS about how a Golden Retriever can and will also rip 3 toddlers to shred and eat their corpses despite this happening...never.
And you won't be honest either. People misread dogs signs all the time. They say " they gave no warning sign" but they don't know them. Children under 10 are the most vulnerable.
Parents let their kids get away with mistreating animals...some dogs are more forgiving than others. But then thats on the owner for not training the kids, not keeping the dog safe. Or chosing the wrong dog.
At our block party two big kids were trying to ride their dog..I told them to stop.
Again, since "pit bull" mixes have alot of breeds what makes you so sure that you can blame the "pit" and not the other working dog breeds for the attack?
I don't care of the owners missed 100s of subtle "signs" from their dogs, you should not have to be a professional animal behaviorist to own a pet. If I missed behavior signals, or even chose to ignore those signals from my dog, she would eventually either retreat to her bed or she would be obnoxious. She'd steal food, she'd get over excited and jump on people, she'd refuse to respond to cues, she might even growl or bite. But she would never (and I 1000% guarantee this) maul or kill a child. She is not gamey, she has inherent bite inhibition, and ultimately she is a domestic pet from a line of domestic pets.
Dogs should also be giving a series of escalating "signals". A domestic pet should not go from lip licking, whale eyes, look aways, and yawns to mauling/killing. There is not a single parent that is telling their child to go snuggle with a growling, air snapping, hackles raised dog, let alone a dog that is biting, making contact with a person's body and releasing. By the time a dog is ready to maul and kill, they should have been giving off multiple "stay away", red zone, obvious behavior signs. We are not talking about a single bite from a stressed dog, we are talking about dogs that literally pull people apart. If pitbulls' danger signals are so subtle that people tend to misread them, and then the mauling/killing is a surprise, then these are not dogs that 99% of people should ever have in the house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love poodles! Not doodles, good, old-fashioned poodles. I love the look of a German Shepherd, not the ones with the sloping back, but the ones that look more like a Belgian shepherd But I know that I don't have the skills to actually own one of those dogs.
Hate pit bulls, any pit-bull mix, and any of those other dogs that have a reputation of violence. Like Cane Corsos and like.
And for the poster, who seems intent on defending Pitt Bulls every time it came up in this thread, yes, even one percent pitt is too much for me. I am the poster that wants to eradicate them by attrition. If they are all spayed and neutered, no more pitt bull puppies. a very humane way to get rid of the breed. And one of the reasons that this breed in particular is being called out by me, is because of posters like you that no matter how dangerous they are, they want to share what lovely dogs they are. We don't get the same response from people who are German Shepherd or Doberman enthusiasts. They know that it takes a certain kind of owner to have one of those type of dogs. Pitbull owners are just over the top and think that anybody can own them. And that's why we have the problem we have with that breed. So blame yourself for making people hate the breed.
Hello. First of all, there is ONE t in pit. Second I'm sure in the past when Doberman or German Shepherds were/are being vilified they would strongly defend them. But, remember we didn't have the internet when they were seem as "bad" dogs so you can not compare my defending them.
Remember there are FIVE breeds that make up pit bull dogs. I think they are the only dog breed that has that many and with mixes you have many many more variations.
"Here are the five breeds: American pit bull terriers, Staffordshire terriers, American Bully, Staffordshire bull terriers and Staffordshire bull terriers .
https://www.thesprucepets.com/pitbull-dog-breeds-4843994pit bull" types now and then.
You have your first amendment right to say your opinion on how YOU hate the breeds and wish they weren't here BUT I also have the right to MY opinion and I will defend them. No where did I say that these dogs are for everyone. The same way German Shepherds are not for everyone. But, I am not for banning them or wishing they didn't exist. Remember your history. German Shepherds and Belgian Malinois were used as police dogs to attack Civil Right movement protesters and also by Nazis to attack Jews and other people. They have the right to exist as do "Pit bull' types and the mixes.
Are there dogs that attack and do serious harm to people, children and pets. Yes. But, first if a dog is 33 percent pit and other dogs that are "tough" German Shepherds etc how do you know that it isn't that part that makes them aggressive?
And lastly, poorly trained dogs and abused dogs can not be held responsible for what the humans put them through. If you chain your dog to the back yard, never feeding them or taking care of their physical or emotional needs and then train them to fight you cannot expect them to be animals that know how to live in harmony with the world.
So in the end while I have the ability to see that some animals harm other people etc there are good "pit bulls" who have been heroes. Your denial of this is just as stubborn as me defending them. So, as long as I can type I will say my opinion and defend these dogs.
I don't care if you respond but, you do not have the right to silence me.
the double 't' and its continued use after being corrected multiple times is just emblematic of their overall low threshold of information and critical thought.
Or their spell check auto changes it Regardless of how it us spelled, pit bulls are not appropriate pets. The pit in pit bull is because the dog was bred to fight in a pit. That is a fighting dog. Not a herder or any other type of working breed.
I have to say, based on this thread alone, the owners or enthusiasts match the dog breed.
But neither "Pitt" nor "Pitt Bull" or "Pittbull" are words so that doesn't explain it.
Like I said, low capacity of information and critical thought.
Due to their history, some can be aggressive toward dogs but human aggression was not only something that wasn't selected for, it was a trait that was avoided due to the nature of the "sport".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Favorites: Newfoundlands, Goldens and labs, Berners, st. Bernards. Big gentle dogs are the best!
Dislikes: anything doodle (poodles are fine, just not my cup of tea). Unfortunately some bad experiences have colored my opinion of pit and pit mixes as well.
Sad that a few dogs color your opinion on so many dogs! Guilty until proven innocent, right?
Nah, for pits it's more like, assume every one is a loaded gun and handle appropriately.
Profiling isnt cool. There is no such dog as a pitbull. How do you know it is the American lit bull terrier that madethe attack and not the chow or German Sheperd in them? And dont forget these dogs are the most abused
Don’t care. They are all useless dogs.
tell me what teacup yorkies do
They don’t murder people.
Ah but we are talking about how "useful" one is. You could have said the teacup Yorkies are useful for companion. Just like pit bulls. Btw, again humans murder and yet we don't condemn every human!
Here is a fair and balanced review of "pit bull" types: https://www.rover.com/blog/important-pit-bull-facts/
My pit bull mix ( also has Australian Shepherd) which can also have problems with socializations! Yes yes but, they don't MAUL anyone! But they can be problem dogs:
https://www.yourpurebredpuppy.com/reviews/australianshepherds.html
Jobs that pit bulls have been used for therapy dogs, police dogs, dogs that sniff out bombs or drugs and members of the family/companion!
https://saveabull.com/pit-bulls-workforce
Don’t care. Pitbulls are ugly and dangerous.
+1
+1 no idea why anyone would want one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Favorites: Labradors, German Shepherds, and Dachshunds
Don’t like: Goldendoodles, Yorkies, and Poodles
Favorite: GS, Beagles, Yorkies, Bichon, Cavalier types. Most big dogs.
Dislike: Anything drooly, anything that sheds or poodles/poodle mixes.
Also, most pits are good - it is the owners of some dogs (big and small) that are awful and irresponsible.
So are you saying that pitts have such awful, irresponsible owners that mauling/killing is reasonable "misbehavior" from a dog?
I seriously doubt that these parents were so awful, they trained their pitts to kill their own children
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/tennessee-mom-in-hospital-after-trying-to-save-her-two-young-children-from-fatal-family-dog-mauling/
That the owners of this dog trained it to kill children?
https://people.com/florida-boy-mauled-death-pit-bull-mix-7560578
Or that the grandma trained this dog to kill her grandson?
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dog-kills-2-year-old-virginia-boy-in-maryland
If I were to be an "awful, irresponsible owner", and decide to stop training my dog for so long she decides to go on a rampage, she's likely to jump on the table and steal food, rummage through the trash, bark for way too long at random people that walk by my house, and chew my kids' toys. No matter how much I ignore her, or let her stop respecting boundaries, or neglect training her, she will not kill or maul people. I would never do that, but if I did she'd be horrible to live with, but she is not a killer. I don't have to train her to not maul people, just like those other owners did not have to train their pitts to kill their children. It is normal for untrained dogs to jump, bark, steal food, chase cars, chew toys, dig holes, etc... It is not normal for untrained dogs to kill/maim people, no matter how awful or irresponsible the owners are.
You'll never get a good faith response to this, though the stats don't lie. You'll get some BS about how a Golden Retriever can and will also rip 3 toddlers to shred and eat their corpses despite this happening...never.
And you won't be honest either. People misread dogs signs all the time. They say " they gave no warning sign" but they don't know them. Children under 10 are the most vulnerable.
Parents let their kids get away with mistreating animals...some dogs are more forgiving than others. But then thats on the owner for not training the kids, not keeping the dog safe. Or chosing the wrong dog.
At our block party two big kids were trying to ride their dog..I told them to stop.
Again, since "pit bull" mixes have alot of breeds what makes you so sure that you can blame the "pit" and not the other working dog breeds for the attack?
I don't care of the owners missed 100s of subtle "signs" from their dogs, you should not have to be a professional animal behaviorist to own a pet. If I missed behavior signals, or even chose to ignore those signals from my dog, she would eventually either retreat to her bed or she would be obnoxious. She'd steal food, she'd get over excited and jump on people, she'd refuse to respond to cues, she might even growl or bite. But she would never (and I 1000% guarantee this) maul or kill a child. She is not gamey, she has inherent bite inhibition, and ultimately she is a domestic pet from a line of domestic pets.
Dogs should also be giving a series of escalating "signals". A domestic pet should not go from lip licking, whale eyes, look aways, and yawns to mauling/killing. There is not a single parent that is telling their child to go snuggle with a growling, air snapping, hackles raised dog, let alone a dog that is biting, making contact with a person's body and releasing. By the time a dog is ready to maul and kill, they should have been giving off multiple "stay away", red zone, obvious behavior signs. We are not talking about a single bite from a stressed dog, we are talking about dogs that literally pull people apart. If pitbulls' danger signals are so subtle that people tend to misread them, and then the mauling/killing is a surprise, then these are not dogs that 99% of people should ever have in the house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love poodles! Not doodles, good, old-fashioned poodles. I love the look of a German Shepherd, not the ones with the sloping back, but the ones that look more like a Belgian shepherd But I know that I don't have the skills to actually own one of those dogs.
Hate pit bulls, any pit-bull mix, and any of those other dogs that have a reputation of violence. Like Cane Corsos and like.
And for the poster, who seems intent on defending Pitt Bulls every time it came up in this thread, yes, even one percent pitt is too much for me. I am the poster that wants to eradicate them by attrition. If they are all spayed and neutered, no more pitt bull puppies. a very humane way to get rid of the breed. And one of the reasons that this breed in particular is being called out by me, is because of posters like you that no matter how dangerous they are, they want to share what lovely dogs they are. We don't get the same response from people who are German Shepherd or Doberman enthusiasts. They know that it takes a certain kind of owner to have one of those type of dogs. Pitbull owners are just over the top and think that anybody can own them. And that's why we have the problem we have with that breed. So blame yourself for making people hate the breed.
Hello. First of all, there is ONE t in pit. Second I'm sure in the past when Doberman or German Shepherds were/are being vilified they would strongly defend them. But, remember we didn't have the internet when they were seem as "bad" dogs so you can not compare my defending them.
Remember there are FIVE breeds that make up pit bull dogs. I think they are the only dog breed that has that many and with mixes you have many many more variations.
"Here are the five breeds: American pit bull terriers, Staffordshire terriers, American Bully, Staffordshire bull terriers and Staffordshire bull terriers .
https://www.thesprucepets.com/pitbull-dog-breeds-4843994pit bull" types now and then.
You have your first amendment right to say your opinion on how YOU hate the breeds and wish they weren't here BUT I also have the right to MY opinion and I will defend them. No where did I say that these dogs are for everyone. The same way German Shepherds are not for everyone. But, I am not for banning them or wishing they didn't exist. Remember your history. German Shepherds and Belgian Malinois were used as police dogs to attack Civil Right movement protesters and also by Nazis to attack Jews and other people. They have the right to exist as do "Pit bull' types and the mixes.
Are there dogs that attack and do serious harm to people, children and pets. Yes. But, first if a dog is 33 percent pit and other dogs that are "tough" German Shepherds etc how do you know that it isn't that part that makes them aggressive?
And lastly, poorly trained dogs and abused dogs can not be held responsible for what the humans put them through. If you chain your dog to the back yard, never feeding them or taking care of their physical or emotional needs and then train them to fight you cannot expect them to be animals that know how to live in harmony with the world.
So in the end while I have the ability to see that some animals harm other people etc there are good "pit bulls" who have been heroes. Your denial of this is just as stubborn as me defending them. So, as long as I can type I will say my opinion and defend these dogs.
I don't care if you respond but, you do not have the right to silence me.
the double 't' and its continued use after being corrected multiple times is just emblematic of their overall low threshold of information and critical thought.
Or their spell check auto changes it Regardless of how it us spelled, pit bulls are not appropriate pets. The pit in pit bull is because the dog was bred to fight in a pit. That is a fighting dog. Not a herder or any other type of working breed.
I have to say, based on this thread alone, the owners or enthusiasts match the dog breed.
But neither "Pitt" nor "Pitt Bull" or "Pittbull" are words so that doesn't explain it.
Like I said, low capacity of information and critical thought.
Due to their history, some can be aggressive toward dogs but human aggression was not only something that wasn't selected for, it was a trait that was avoided due to the nature of the "sport".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Love poodles! Not doodles, good, old-fashioned poodles. I love the look of a German Shepherd, not the ones with the sloping back, but the ones that look more like a Belgian shepherd But I know that I don't have the skills to actually own one of those dogs.
Hate pit bulls, any pit-bull mix, and any of those other dogs that have a reputation of violence. Like Cane Corsos and like.
And for the poster, who seems intent on defending Pitt Bulls every time it came up in this thread, yes, even one percent pitt is too much for me. I am the poster that wants to eradicate them by attrition. If they are all spayed and neutered, no more pitt bull puppies. a very humane way to get rid of the breed. And one of the reasons that this breed in particular is being called out by me, is because of posters like you that no matter how dangerous they are, they want to share what lovely dogs they are. We don't get the same response from people who are German Shepherd or Doberman enthusiasts. They know that it takes a certain kind of owner to have one of those type of dogs. Pitbull owners are just over the top and think that anybody can own them. And that's why we have the problem we have with that breed. So blame yourself for making people hate the breed.
Hello. First of all, there is ONE t in pit. Second I'm sure in the past when Doberman or German Shepherds were/are being vilified they would strongly defend them. But, remember we didn't have the internet when they were seem as "bad" dogs so you can not compare my defending them.
Remember there are FIVE breeds that make up pit bull dogs. I think they are the only dog breed that has that many and with mixes you have many many more variations.
"Here are the five breeds: American pit bull terriers, Staffordshire terriers, American Bully, Staffordshire bull terriers and Staffordshire bull terriers .
https://www.thesprucepets.com/pitbull-dog-breeds-4843994pit bull" types now and then.
You have your first amendment right to say your opinion on how YOU hate the breeds and wish they weren't here BUT I also have the right to MY opinion and I will defend them. No where did I say that these dogs are for everyone. The same way German Shepherds are not for everyone. But, I am not for banning them or wishing they didn't exist. Remember your history. German Shepherds and Belgian Malinois were used as police dogs to attack Civil Right movement protesters and also by Nazis to attack Jews and other people. They have the right to exist as do "Pit bull' types and the mixes.
Are there dogs that attack and do serious harm to people, children and pets. Yes. But, first if a dog is 33 percent pit and other dogs that are "tough" German Shepherds etc how do you know that it isn't that part that makes them aggressive?
And lastly, poorly trained dogs and abused dogs can not be held responsible for what the humans put them through. If you chain your dog to the back yard, never feeding them or taking care of their physical or emotional needs and then train them to fight you cannot expect them to be animals that know how to live in harmony with the world.
So in the end while I have the ability to see that some animals harm other people etc there are good "pit bulls" who have been heroes. Your denial of this is just as stubborn as me defending them. So, as long as I can type I will say my opinion and defend these dogs.
I don't care if you respond but, you do not have the right to silence me.
the double 't' and its continued use after being corrected multiple times is just emblematic of their overall low threshold of information and critical thought.
Or their spell check auto changes it Regardless of how it us spelled, pit bulls are not appropriate pets. The pit in pit bull is because the dog was bred to fight in a pit. That is a fighting dog. Not a herder or any other type of working breed.
I have to say, based on this thread alone, the owners or enthusiasts match the dog breed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Favorites: Labradors, German Shepherds, and Dachshunds
Don’t like: Goldendoodles, Yorkies, and Poodles
Favorite: GS, Beagles, Yorkies, Bichon, Cavalier types. Most big dogs.
Dislike: Anything drooly, anything that sheds or poodles/poodle mixes.
Also, most pits are good - it is the owners of some dogs (big and small) that are awful and irresponsible.
So are you saying that pitts have such awful, irresponsible owners that mauling/killing is reasonable "misbehavior" from a dog?
I seriously doubt that these parents were so awful, they trained their pitts to kill their own children
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/tennessee-mom-in-hospital-after-trying-to-save-her-two-young-children-from-fatal-family-dog-mauling/
That the owners of this dog trained it to kill children?
https://people.com/florida-boy-mauled-death-pit-bull-mix-7560578
Or that the grandma trained this dog to kill her grandson?
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dog-kills-2-year-old-virginia-boy-in-maryland
If I were to be an "awful, irresponsible owner", and decide to stop training my dog for so long she decides to go on a rampage, she's likely to jump on the table and steal food, rummage through the trash, bark for way too long at random people that walk by my house, and chew my kids' toys. No matter how much I ignore her, or let her stop respecting boundaries, or neglect training her, she will not kill or maul people. I would never do that, but if I did she'd be horrible to live with, but she is not a killer. I don't have to train her to not maul people, just like those other owners did not have to train their pitts to kill their children. It is normal for untrained dogs to jump, bark, steal food, chase cars, chew toys, dig holes, etc... It is not normal for untrained dogs to kill/maim people, no matter how awful or irresponsible the owners are.
You'll never get a good faith response to this, though the stats don't lie. You'll get some BS about how a Golden Retriever can and will also rip 3 toddlers to shred and eat their corpses despite this happening...never.
And you won't be honest either. People misread dogs signs all the time. They say " they gave no warning sign" but they don't know them. Children under 10 are the most vulnerable.
Parents let their kids get away with mistreating animals...some dogs are more forgiving than others. But then thats on the owner for not training the kids, not keeping the dog safe. Or chosing the wrong dog.
At our block party two big kids were trying to ride their dog..I told them to stop.
Again, since "pit bull" mixes have alot of breeds what makes you so sure that you can blame the "pit" and not the other working dog breeds for the attack?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Favorites: Labradors, German Shepherds, and Dachshunds
Don’t like: Goldendoodles, Yorkies, and Poodles
Favorite: GS, Beagles, Yorkies, Bichon, Cavalier types. Most big dogs.
Dislike: Anything drooly, anything that sheds or poodles/poodle mixes.
Also, most pits are good - it is the owners of some dogs (big and small) that are awful and irresponsible.
So are you saying that pitts have such awful, irresponsible owners that mauling/killing is reasonable "misbehavior" from a dog?
I seriously doubt that these parents were so awful, they trained their pitts to kill their own children
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/tennessee-mom-in-hospital-after-trying-to-save-her-two-young-children-from-fatal-family-dog-mauling/
That the owners of this dog trained it to kill children?
https://people.com/florida-boy-mauled-death-pit-bull-mix-7560578
Or that the grandma trained this dog to kill her grandson?
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dog-kills-2-year-old-virginia-boy-in-maryland
If I were to be an "awful, irresponsible owner", and decide to stop training my dog for so long she decides to go on a rampage, she's likely to jump on the table and steal food, rummage through the trash, bark for way too long at random people that walk by my house, and chew my kids' toys. No matter how much I ignore her, or let her stop respecting boundaries, or neglect training her, she will not kill or maul people. I would never do that, but if I did she'd be horrible to live with, but she is not a killer. I don't have to train her to not maul people, just like those other owners did not have to train their pitts to kill their children. It is normal for untrained dogs to jump, bark, steal food, chase cars, chew toys, dig holes, etc... It is not normal for untrained dogs to kill/maim people, no matter how awful or irresponsible the owners are.
You'll never get a good faith response to this, though the stats don't lie. You'll get some BS about how a Golden Retriever can and will also rip 3 toddlers to shred and eat their corpses despite this happening...never.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like any dog that has a good human who isn't a selfish a-hole.
If a dog isn't trained ( any dog) is he the a-hole or the owner who should know better?
It's the owner's fault and so the owner is the A-hole not the dog
Um. Yeah. That's what PP said. The phrase "who isn't a selfish a-hole" modifies the noun "human".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like any dog that has a good human who isn't a selfish a-hole.
If a dog isn't trained ( any dog) is he the a-hole or the owner who should know better?
It's the owner's fault and so the owner is the A-hole not the dog
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My Favorites: Labradors, German Shepherds, and Dachshunds
Don’t like: Goldendoodles, Yorkies, and Poodles
Favorite: GS, Beagles, Yorkies, Bichon, Cavalier types. Most big dogs.
Dislike: Anything drooly, anything that sheds or poodles/poodle mixes.
Also, most pits are good - it is the owners of some dogs (big and small) that are awful and irresponsible.
So are you saying that pitts have such awful, irresponsible owners that mauling/killing is reasonable "misbehavior" from a dog?
I seriously doubt that these parents were so awful, they trained their pitts to kill their own children
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/tennessee-mom-in-hospital-after-trying-to-save-her-two-young-children-from-fatal-family-dog-mauling/
That the owners of this dog trained it to kill children?
https://people.com/florida-boy-mauled-death-pit-bull-mix-7560578
Or that the grandma trained this dog to kill her grandson?
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/dog-kills-2-year-old-virginia-boy-in-maryland
If I were to be an "awful, irresponsible owner", and decide to stop training my dog for so long she decides to go on a rampage, she's likely to jump on the table and steal food, rummage through the trash, bark for way too long at random people that walk by my house, and chew my kids' toys. No matter how much I ignore her, or let her stop respecting boundaries, or neglect training her, she will not kill or maul people. I would never do that, but if I did she'd be horrible to live with, but she is not a killer. I don't have to train her to not maul people, just like those other owners did not have to train their pitts to kill their children. It is normal for untrained dogs to jump, bark, steal food, chase cars, chew toys, dig holes, etc... It is not normal for untrained dogs to kill/maim people, no matter how awful or irresponsible the owners are.