Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not say he wanted immigrants to surge the border.
He jumbled a bunch of talking points during a debate.
He clearly was saying surging agents to process asylum seekers.
And guess what? Very few immigrants qualify for that.

You are trying to spin. And, failing completely.

During the debate here are his exact words:

“I would in fact make sure that there is, that we immediately surge to the border — all those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard,” Biden said. “That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.’ “

I’ve watched it. It’s clear he’s jumbling talking points. And he is clearly specifically talking about asylum seekers. Which most entering through Mexico are not. Try again.

South Americans and people from the Guatemala and El Salvador have learned to claim asylum. It doesn't matter if they are qualified or not, just that they make the claim

And then they eventually get kicked out.

Do they? They have years before the hearing and then they become undocumented when they either no show or just ignore the results.

Then be sure to vote for people who will approve the spending that it requires to hire people needed to process them quickly. Ask yourself why won’t the GOP support that? Because they benefit from the crisis.

They are processed and released, what’s the point?
Best to keep them out so that they can’t even make their bogus claims.

How do you plan to keep them from coming?
I keep asking and no one answers

I think it will need time and the word to spread that it has become difficult. Why not come if there is an app for it and you don’t need to remain in Mexico?
So, make sure that no one is crossing the border. Whoever approaches an officer or a point of entry to ask for asylum remains in Mexico and waits in less than stellar conditions.
No need to separate the kids, keep families together, pour money into basic medical help and some food and a basic security but nothing more.
Some legislative changes are needed but not sure it’s possible.
Democrats should stop even mentioning the path to legal status/citizenship.
Remain in Mexico policy is something that was realistic. Reinstate and expand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not say he wanted immigrants to surge the border.
He jumbled a bunch of talking points during a debate.
He clearly was saying surging agents to process asylum seekers.
And guess what? Very few immigrants qualify for that.

If it takes a few years to go to before an immigration judge, and you're released in the meantime, and can easily disappear before the hearing, does it matter if you qualify?

So what do you want catch and release replaced with?
What do you want to see done?
They stopped coming because we threatened their children. Were you ok with that? It’s about the only thing that will deter people. So is that what you are voting for?

I want to see an EO stating that Mexico is a safe country and the immediate deportation of anyone entering illegally through Mexico regardless of asylum claims

An EO does not supersede legislative and regulatory allowances. Under the LAW, seeking asylum is legal and those people are not "illegal." Biden cannot undo that with an EO.

Keep them in Mexico so that they can’t ask for asylum?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not say he wanted immigrants to surge the border.
He jumbled a bunch of talking points during a debate.
He clearly was saying surging agents to process asylum seekers.
And guess what? Very few immigrants qualify for that.

You are trying to spin. And, failing completely.

During the debate here are his exact words:

“I would in fact make sure that there is, that we immediately surge to the border — all those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard,” Biden said. “That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.’ “

I’ve watched it. It’s clear he’s jumbling talking points. And he is clearly specifically talking about asylum seekers. Which most entering through Mexico are not. Try again.

South Americans and people from the Guatemala and El Salvador have learned to claim asylum. It doesn't matter if they are qualified or not, just that they make the claim

And then they eventually get kicked out.

Do they? They have years before the hearing and then they become undocumented when they either no show or just ignore the results.

Then be sure to vote for people who will approve the spending that it requires to hire people needed to process them quickly. Ask yourself why won’t the GOP support that? Because they benefit from the crisis.

They are processed and released, what’s the point?
Best to keep them out so that they can’t even make their bogus claims.

How do you plan to keep them from coming?
I keep asking and no one answers

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not say he wanted immigrants to surge the border.
He jumbled a bunch of talking points during a debate.
He clearly was saying surging agents to process asylum seekers.
And guess what? Very few immigrants qualify for that.

You are trying to spin. And, failing completely.

During the debate here are his exact words:

“I would in fact make sure that there is, that we immediately surge to the border — all those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard,” Biden said. “That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.’ “

I’ve watched it. It’s clear he’s jumbling talking points. And he is clearly specifically talking about asylum seekers. Which most entering through Mexico are not. Try again.

South Americans and people from the Guatemala and El Salvador have learned to claim asylum. It doesn't matter if they are qualified or not, just that they make the claim

And then they eventually get kicked out.

Do they? They have years before the hearing and then they become undocumented when they either no show or just ignore the results.

Then be sure to vote for people who will approve the spending that it requires to hire people needed to process them quickly. Ask yourself why won’t the GOP support that? Because they benefit from the crisis.

They are processed and released, what’s the point?
Best to keep them out so that they can’t even make their bogus claims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really time to consider the No Labels party

They don't have a candidate. You're once again stuck with a choice between Trump and Biden. God help us.

Biden needs a geriatric ward where he can have lots of ice cream cones.

This might be funny if his opponent were a strapping 45 year old fitness nut.

Haha, the joke is on us

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really time to consider the No Labels party

They don't have a candidate. You're once again stuck with a choice between Trump and Biden. God help us.

Biden needs a geriatric ward where he can have lots of ice cream cones.

This might be funny if his opponent were a strapping 45 year old fitness nut.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really time to consider the No Labels party

They don't have a candidate. You're once again stuck with a choice between Trump and Biden. God help us.

Biden needs a geriatric ward where he can have lots of ice cream cones.

Anonymous wrote:It will be funny watching the press get arrested. They like to avoid stories that show republicans is a bad light. The remaining press will just parrot Trump’s talking points ….like they do now.

Even the military chief of staff with a long and dignified life of service fears that he and other military leaders who choose to follow the constitution over his erratic self serving demands -/ will be arrested if Trump regains office …

Definitely no laughing matter and many cornerstones of a healthy democracy apart from free press will be under threat again if Trump is reelected …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden did not say he wanted immigrants to surge the border.
He jumbled a bunch of talking points during a debate.
He clearly was saying surging agents to process asylum seekers.
And guess what? Very few immigrants qualify for that.

If it takes a few years to go to before an immigration judge, and you're released in the meantime, and can easily disappear before the hearing, does it matter if you qualify?

So what do you want catch and release replaced with?
What do you want to see done?
They stopped coming because we threatened their children. Were you ok with that? It’s about the only thing that will deter people. So is that what you are voting for?

I want to see an EO stating that Mexico is a safe country and the immediate deportation of anyone entering illegally through Mexico regardless of asylum claims

An EO does not supersede legislative and regulatory allowances. Under the LAW, seeking asylum is legal and those people are not "illegal." Biden cannot undo that with an EO.

Tell us more about seeking asylum. I thought you had to request asylum from the first foreign country you reached.

Anonymous wrote:Really time to consider the No Labels party

They don't have a candidate. You're once again stuck with a choice between Trump and Biden. God help us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I live in Ohio.
No one in my circle regrets voting for Biden.
Signed,
Real American

I live in NoVA.
Everyone in my circle regrets voting for Biden.
Signed,
Another Real American

Also in NOVA and my experience is the exact opposite as this poster.

. That’s a relief

What do they miss most? The treasonous alliance with Putin’s talking points over US intelligence ? The endless lies and crass language? The tax cuts for the Uber wealthy that send US into the red? The rapid fire succession of aids and allies who quit ? The alienation of traditional allies in favor of despots ? Mishandling of national security documents ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hold out hope that some of the adults who worked with Trump during his first term (Kelly, Asper, Miley) will come out with PSAs saying: do not, under any circumstances vote for Trump and reiterate how unfit he is to serve.

I have an idea.
Biden can get some Russians to dig up some fake dirt on Trump and create a dirty dossier.
It almost worked for Hillary.

LOL.

It will be funny watching the press get arrested. They like to avoid stories that show republicans is a bad light. The remaining press will just parrot Trump’s talking points ….like they do now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m with you OP. Despite wishful thinking I’ve got a feeling Biden isn’t going to win this.

I’d like to claim some dramatic ultimatum, like leaving the country to take up a new life somewhere saner. But who am I kidding? At my age I’m not going anywhere. I’ll probably just hunker down & read escapist books. Maybe get some firearms training.

I would recommend you start training with an AR-15. As much as the left shits on rifles, the rifle is actually the greatest equalizer if you are women or disabled or young. A pistol is actually 10x harder to master and handgun shooting is a perishable skill, requiring countless hours of range time largely only professionals have time to afford.

Oh hell no. F off NRA. Just got back from a country with very few fire storms and it was fantastic. Relaxing.

great, when you have successfully defunded the police or we have a fiscal crisis from all the reckless money printing causing a lack of funding to pay for police, you will be defending yourself with a pepper spray right (oh wait that requires registration in DC, lol)

Biden wants to increase spending on police training not defund the police -

So many lies…