Anonymous wrote:Sofia confirmed in People magazine that they divorced over having kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
She was ~42 when she got married. Absolutely could have had kids then if she wanted. [/quote
But she didn't and that is her choice
She came out a few years ago when she got together with Joe and said she wasn’t interested in having any more children. She was clear about those intentions when they married. It’s obvious he changed his mind which is well within his right, but as another poster pointed out, he now is going to be a dad of a baby in his 50s, which comes with its own issues.
It could also just be an excuse… the story with Justin Theroux was that he and Jen ended things because he wanted babies… That was 6 years ago and the guy is 52 and no closer to having kids - in fact he’s dating a mid 20s women who’s probably not interested in having kids for another five years at least I’m most likely not with him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She will get older and lonelier (and washed up in Hollywood) and end up putting those fertilized eggs she has with the financier ex ex into a surrogate. I give it five years.
The matter with her ex and her embryos is done, over.
I have (good) news for you: a woman can have a happy, satisfying life without a man or a Hollywood career. It is possible!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sofia confirmed in People magazine that they divorced over having kids.
they didn't discuss this before they married?
My friend is going through this now. She and her partner moved in together when she was 35 and he was 32. They talked about having kids and she emphasized that they would have to start trying right away if they were going to try to have a child. He said he didn't want any. She turned 40 six months ago and now suddenly he might want kids. Of course he's still not motivated or interested enough to talk to her about their options. He just...might want kids. She's done some preliminary appointments on her own and just got diagnosed with endometriosis.
He's clearly going to leave her eventually but neither of them is communicating. It's very frustrating to watch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
She was ~42 when she got married. Absolutely could have had kids then if she wanted.
But she didn't and that is her choice
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
She was ~42 when she got married. Absolutely could have had kids then if she wanted. [/quote
But she didn't and that is her choice
Anonymous wrote:She will get older and lonelier (and washed up in Hollywood) and end up putting those fertilized eggs she has with the financier ex ex into a surrogate. I give it five years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
She was ~42 when she got married. Absolutely could have had kids then if she wanted.
Ummm. No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
She was ~42 when she got married. Absolutely could have had kids then if she wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
She was not plenty young. She is in her 50s. She’s probably been nearly barren for nearly 20 years.
Anonymous wrote:He is good looking, young (born 1976) and Catholic he deserves kids.
BTW in the Catholic Faith marriage is for the procreation of life. Sophia is Catholic too. He is entitled to an annulment.
They got married in 2015 when Sophia plenty young to have a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She will get older and lonelier (and washed up in Hollywood) and end up putting those fertilized eggs she has with the financier ex ex into a surrogate. I give it five years.
Will not happen. That ex will never get a dime of her money (what he is after, not kids). She'll find a new partner and enjoy her unencumbered life, as she should. Ageist nonsense to suggest otherwise.