Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tudor queen Elizabeth I was slathering all that poisonous cream on her face everyday to look as white as can be.
You really should do some research before posting, moron

It was to cover scars, you twit.

Also, one of the guys in the lower left has a rainbow stripe on his clothing; does that count toward the “acceptable” quota for anything?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh my, the amount of wealth, ego, excess under the guys of minimalism, and extreme privilege at the table, is astounding.

Lol

Guys! guys! guise took three tries to get it to spell correctly when using dictation!

I am going to need one of you dictation posters to do an AMA at some point. Like you’re just saying responses out loud to your phone where people can hear you? DCUM is not your secret shame?

Anyone who feels so compelled to respond to DCUM posts that they have to dictate responses is . . . well, something.

Anonymous wrote:Tudor queen Elizabeth I was slathering all that poisonous cream on her face everyday to look as white as can be.
You really should do some research before posting, moron

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One reason people may be reacting so strongly to her in particular (instead of if someone else posted it) is because apparently she wrote a book called “purple,” in which she describes the necessity of making a point in surrounding one’s self with diversity. She apparently claims that she makes a point to do this for her children, too.

Not sure if the above is true or not.

He didn't post the pic. I couldn't care less who any of these celebrities host at their house. It's a private party.

Funny how nobody is calling out Jimmy Kimmel. Even though it's been pointed out several times it's his party and she was a guest. Why is that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? Anyone with a half a brain knows most white people supporting DE&I and voting left wing don’t actually hang out with POC. It’s all talk. I live in a wealthy neighborhood that’s 99% white. Everyone talks a big game and the DE&I actions at the local schools are heavily supported.

But start bussing in minority children or have some AAs move into the neighborhood and you’d start seeing a large number of for sale signs in yards. It’s all talk. Everyone wants to support diversity but wealthy white don’t want to live around increased crime, single parent homes or lower educational standards.

Bussing is a whole different animal - neither side likes bussing - I was there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Were any of the guests LGTBQ?

Hey! I don't see any transexuals!

Anonymous wrote:OMG it’s Idaho. If I host a party in my DC suburb there are going to be a lot more POC than if I host a party of friends and acquaintances who just happen to be in a random, remote town in the mountains in the summer. I highly doubt that motley crew all flew in for the dinner or coordinated vacation plans - they just happen to be at the same resort.

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? Anyone with a half a brain knows most white people supporting DE&I and voting left wing don’t actually hang out with POC. It’s all talk. I live in a wealthy neighborhood that’s 99% white. Everyone talks a big game and the DE&I actions at the local schools are heavily supported.

But start bussing in minority children or have some AAs move into the neighborhood and you’d start seeing a large number of for sale signs in yards. It’s all talk. Everyone wants to support diversity but wealthy white don’t want to live around increased crime, single parent homes or lower educational standards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Planet is melting, Ukraine is fighting for their survival and this is what US is worried about. No wonder so many are leaving Dem party.

Its the right that's fake virtue signaling about this.

Anonymous wrote:Planet is melting, Ukraine is fighting for their survival and this is what US is worried about. No wonder so many are leaving Dem party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the most controversial thing is that Jimmy Fallon was invited to Jimmy Kimmel's ranch. You'd never see Leno inviting Letterman (or vice versa) or Carson inviting . . . anyone. Times have changed in late night!

Jimmy Fallon is aggressively unfunny and untalented, so even a slightly above average talent like Kimmel is unlikely to be threatened by him.

Fallon is in the position he's in primarily because of his skill at kissing corporate and celebrity a$$es. I bet this was a very productive dinner for him!