Anonymous wrote:And, in Maryland, I have seen absolutely no change at all in behavior since the law changed. Not even any extra pot smoke, but we do love in a sfh neighborhood.
The people who smoked before are the people who smoke after.
Anonymous wrote:And, in Maryland, I have seen absolutely no change at all in behavior since the law changed. Not even any extra pot smoke, but we do love in a sfh neighborhood.
The people who smoked before are the people who smoke after.
Anonymous wrote:And, in Maryland, I have seen absolutely no change at all in behavior since the law changed. Not even any extra pot smoke, but we do love in a sfh neighborhood.
The people who smoked before are the people who smoke after.
Anonymous wrote:My tribe! Martini Lunch?? No, that’s another word for ADDICTION.
Drunks sure do make me sick. In their stupor. Ew!
Anonymous wrote:My tribe! Martini Lunch?? No, that’s another word for ADDICTION.
Drunks sure do make me sick. In their stupor. Ew!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we've ended up with a pro-intoxication culture. Anyone who points out that habitual intoxication is actually bad on both personal and societal levels is dismissed as a Puritan, which is somehow understood as worse than the worthy and eminently relative ambition of spending your life in a drooling daze.
I couldn't agree more. Where are you my soul sister?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think we've ended up with a pro-intoxication culture. Anyone who points out that habitual intoxication is actually bad on both personal and societal levels is dismissed as a Puritan, which is somehow understood as worse than the worthy and eminently relative ambition of spending your life in a drooling daze.
I couldn't agree more. Where are you my soul sister?