Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is generational wealth?
When assets are passed down across multiple generations, that's often referred to as generational wealth. What type of assets? Think property, a Roth IRA account, a 401(k), life insurance, stocks and bonds, or anything else that has monetary value.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/how-to-build-generational-wealth
I think you’re being purposefully obtuse. In a conversation with another, would you say you have generational wealth if you inherited less than a very large amount? Anyone can submit a definition.
https://themakingofamillionaire.com/how-much-money-is-needed-to-build-generational-wealth-330d5b013695
“Generational wealth is achieved when you’ve accumulated enough investments to pay for your families living expenses in perpetuity without touching the principal.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is generational wealth?
When assets are passed down across multiple generations, that's often referred to as generational wealth. What type of assets? Think property, a Roth IRA account, a 401(k), life insurance, stocks and bonds, or anything else that has monetary value.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/how-to-build-generational-wealth
I think you’re being purposefully obtuse. In a conversation with another, would you say you have generational wealth if you inherited less than a very large amount? Anyone can submit a definition.
https://themakingofamillionaire.com/how-much-money-is-needed-to-build-generational-wealth-330d5b013695
“Generational wealth is achieved when you’ve accumulated enough investments to pay for your families living expenses in perpetuity without touching the principal.”
Anonymous wrote:What is generational wealth?
When assets are passed down across multiple generations, that's often referred to as generational wealth. What type of assets? Think property, a Roth IRA account, a 401(k), life insurance, stocks and bonds, or anything else that has monetary value.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/how-to-build-generational-wealth
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you define generational wealth?
Literally the term means when wealth (any money or real assets) are passed from one generation to the next. Any other definition is DCUM bs.
Really? So when grandpa gives a grandkid $20, that's generational wealth? When a parent passes away and leaves $10,000 split between three heirs, that's generational wealth?
If that's really your position, all future conversations regarding generational wealth are pointless.
of you die and your heirs inherit property- that is generational wealth, it is enough to cause the huge wealth gap between Black and white Americans and the gap between white and South-Asian Americans. knowing how to preserve property and pass it on to your heirs even it is a small amount has a snowball effect through the generations- its why poor white Appalachians have measurable more wealth than their equally miserable and same living standard Black peers in the Delta. I had a friend in college who was white and her parents took out a loan on their owned since the revolution small farm on the eastern shore and she was enraged when someone said she was benefiting from generational wealth since she was under so much pressure to pay back that loan and also their lives as small farmers was incredibly labor intensive and lacking in luxury but she was still better off than our peers who had nothing. In fact her family was dumb- their forbears who kept the farm for 200 years even if it was a hardscrabble living were smarter b/c they kept their land mortgage free until this college obsessed generation came along. She is doing well and they still have their farm but they were one pregnancy or drug addiction away from losing inherited property passed on over 2 centuries! generational wealth doesn't mean that you are independently wealthy.
No, inheriting any property at all is not generational wealth. The word wealth means something: inherited property versus inherited wealth.
Also, I mean this in a gentle way, but try and make your sentences shorter. It’s very hard to digest when they are too long. Example: “ I had a friend in college who was white and her parents took out a loan on their owned since the revolution small farm on the eastern shore and she was enraged when someone said she was benefiting from generational wealth since she was under so much pressure to pay back that loan and also their lives as small farmers was incredibly labor intensive and lacking in luxury but she was still better off than our peers who had nothing.”
Marrying into other wealthy families would obviously be beneficial into maintaining generational wealth. But the key is to living off the passive income of the wealth and not drawing down the principal. So if the wealth was in the stock market one would be tapping the dividends but not selling shares. And if in real estate, living off the rental income and not selling the properties.Anonymous wrote:One 2G grandfather left over $13MM when he died ~1912; another, about $4MM at death ~1900. Part of Mrs Astor's "Guilded Age" 400, 5th Ave mansions, the works.
The depression, alcoholism, and marrying impecunious women (including from old-school NY elite families), and in my line, all that's left is a bunch of silver, horse paintings, and brown furniture nobody wants.
The trick to maintaining generational wealth: leveraging your social cachet to marry into other wealthy families. My dad had plenty of 2nd cousins who were fabulously rich because their parents and grandparents married into big-money families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people here are confusing basic generational wealth with “dynasty wealth”.
Not really. Generational wealth is a recently invented buzzword that means nothing because the range is enormous and includes everything under the sun and imposes a fake binary. Dynastic wealth has historical precedence.
Generational wealth is not recently invented and you're confusing it because you're thinking it describes a threshold when it actually describes a category of types of transfers. It doesn't impose a binary at all, it's usefulness is a description of a category in which you could divide into any number of levels you want (e.g., reverse generational wealth transfer, no generational wealth transfer, minimal generational wealth transfer, average..., top 10%, top 1%, etc. etc.).
I suspect you, and I, and most people never heard the term used with any meaningful regularity till quite recently. Maybe you can find it being used in arcane academic journals but you are also missing the point. And what you described also showed clearly why "generational wealth" means nothing, as it encompasses everything from a billionaire leaving billions to his children to a working class carpenter who was frugal his entire life leaving a paid off house and 100k to his only child.