Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone successfully appealed the MCPS early entrance into kindergarten assessment exam to get your child into kindergarten?
MCPS has an age cutoff for 5-years old by September 1, but will test kids that turn 5 between September 2nd to October 15th. My daughter will turn 5 on September 15th, two weeks after the cutoff. She has been in the school aged room of her daycare for about six-months because they thought she was ready to move up. We were all shocked when we found out she didn’t pass the exam. She is social-emotionally mature, can independently complete multi-step directions, passed the mathematics and letter naming parts of the early entrance exam, but did not pass the reading/writing part. Has anyone successfully appealed MCPS to get your child into kindergarten? What supporting documentation did you submit? Are there any buzzwords/phases that are helpful to use? Is it worth mentioning her older sibling already attends the school? Any help is greatly appreciated! My daughter is ready to start school and these technicalities are heartbreaking for her continued education.
The test expects the child to already know how to read practically which is stupid. No actual kindergartener could pass the test. And they make it impossible to contact anyone and I am almost 100% positive that the email that they send you too is bullshit
The point of the test is not to find kids who theoretically could handle kindergarten a bit early if given the chance. The point is to identify the very small number of kids who are so advanced that their learning will be actively harmed by being forced to wait another year. Thus, it measures mastery of end of kindergarten objectives. They don't care about what statutory age kindergarteners can or can't do. The point is to identify the extreme outliers, not the "kind of bright." Many parents don't seem to get this.
This. A girl in my DC’s pre-K class missed the cutoff by 2 days and by all accounts she knew her letter sounds, etc. better than my DC and many of the other kids in the class. But she wasn’t actually reading yet so didn’t pass the test.
I don’t see what is so bad about waiting another year. My daughter can read above first grade curriculum standards but I’m thankful for the additional year we have in preschool. We’re using that to ensure she is the top student in her grade when she does finally start.
No, you really don’t want that. It comes with its own significant problems.
I think every family should decide for their individual child, who has their own unique combination of strengths and weaknesses whether to start early, late, or on time. In many cases, there may not be a right or wrong answer, seeing as any option, while beneficial in some aspects, may create challenges in others.
Being too far ahead of their peers creates its own difficulties. It can lead to boredom, dissatisfaction with learning, alienation and resentment from peers, even difficulty in arranging the higher level classes they may need at some point. My child was the top student academically in their class, although they had other challenges. Life would have been so much easier if they hadn’t been so far ahead. They played with numbers like they were just another toy. I tried to hold them back from learning to read, but gave up when they started sounding out words. They had an insatiable curiosity. I still remember dragging them from the library with more books than they could carry, promising to return for more books whenever they wanted, and their eyes shining as they explained, “but Mommy, there’s so much to learn”. By the start of third grade, they were shutting down. They had lost all enthusiasm for anything related to school or learning. To compound it, there was a truly horrendous bullying problem at the school and they made a convenient target (after they switched schools in fourth, we heard from other parents that the bullies moved on to other victims). I was actually beginning to fear that if we didn’t turn things around that DC might be suicidal as a teenager, if not before. Obviously, my child’s case isn’t typical, and I’m certainly not saying that academic excellence leads to tragedy. While I think you should encourage your child’s interests, recognize that being one of the better students is sometimes better than being the best.
I highly recommend you focus less on accelerating your daughter and focus more on enrichment. Introduce her to a wide variety of experiences. Talk about other countries, appreciate the wonder of nature, go on little field trips, see shows and performances, do science activities at home, play games, do crafts, cook together, read together, etc. At this age, they are sponges and everything is a learning experience. Their brains are busy growing neurons, and the more context they have about their world, the more it will help them later in many ways, including academics. They also need balance - time to socialize, time to challenge themselves, physically and burn off excess energy, time to be silly, and sometimes even time to just veg out.
Here’s a post that I read about how one parent uses cooking as a teaching method. I wished at the time that my kids were still young enough to incorporate these ideas. While I had cooked with my kids, I had not given them this type of comprehensive experience. Poster 08/04/2020 11:44
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/901600.page#17790406
Here’s a website that explores all assets of giftedness. You might find it helpful as your child gets older.
https://www.hoagiesgifted.org/
They have links to websites offering enrichment for all different subjects and ages. While most lean towards school-aged kids, here is their page for younger kids:
https://www.hoagiesgifted.org/young_kids.htm
Enjoy this time together. It goes by far too quickly.