Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what would happen if
1) applications worked more like a ranking system. Applicants rank schools (blind to schools) and schools choose applicants - then you get into the highest school that accepted you on their list.
or
2) ED occurred at the same time as RD. You apply and can choose one top choice. If you get in, you go. If not, you see what else is left on your acceptance list.
I wonder what would happened if universities were transparent and honest about racial admission standards.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what would happen if
1) applications worked more like a ranking system. Applicants rank schools (blind to schools) and schools choose applicants - then you get into the highest school that accepted you on their list.
or
2) ED occurred at the same time as RD. You apply and can choose one top choice. If you get in, you go. If not, you see what else is left on your acceptance list.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what would happen if 1) applications worked more like a ranking system. Applicants rank schools (blind to schools) and schools choose applicants - then you get into the highest school that accepted you on their list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cap ED.
Can only apply to 1 ED school. So it is already capped.
Cap it for schools. No more than 10% of a class filled with ED.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cap ED.
Can only apply to 1 ED school. So it is already capped.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder what would happen if
1) applications worked more like a ranking system. Applicants rank schools (blind to schools) and schools choose applicants - then you get into the highest school that accepted you on their list.
or
2) ED occurred at the same time as RD. You apply and can choose one top choice. If you get in, you go. If not, you see what else is left on your acceptance list.
Anonymous wrote:get rid of legacy. I think we're about 3 cycles from that anyway.