Anonymous wrote:-Carpetbaggers from parts of the country (but not “flyovers”) that don’t have equivalent website but need advice from sophisticated DCUMs
-Why is this house listed so low posters?
-Etiquette questions that end up getting crucified by page 2
Anonymous wrote:The College Forum ratings lists person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The (I presume) guys who engage in pointless fundamentalist Christian vs. atheist debates in the religion forum. I imagine them chortling, "Ha HA! What about THIS!" as they consult their book of logical fallacies and throw around Latin terms they don't understand, all to go around in pointless circles. They should just accept that they are yin to the other's yang.
No way. If someone doesn’t check those nutters then they’ll have us all living in the Christian version of Afghanistan in a generation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The person who leaves a double space before periods in sentences, like this .
Relatedly, people who purposefully put extra lines in their response so that it stands out more on the page, but also never have anything particularly useful or inserting to contribute.
True.
Anonymous wrote:The (I presume) guys who engage in pointless fundamentalist Christian vs. atheist debates in the religion forum. I imagine them chortling, "Ha HA! What about THIS!" as they consult their book of logical fallacies and throw around Latin terms they don't understand, all to go around in pointless circles. They should just accept that they are yin to the other's yang.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poster in the Entertainment forum who takes shows waaaaaaaaaay too seriously and writes incredibly long, self-important analyses of each episode.
I love this poster or posters. Reading or listening in depth analysis of TV shows I enjoy is a longtime hobby of mine. I used to love the Television Without Pity recaps (some of them were like 25 pages long for ONE episode) and the Tom & Lorenzo "Mad Style" recaps of Mad Men episodes as interpreted through the costuming and set design. Seriously one of my top 10 favorite things about the internet.
That poster wrote some very long, detailed analyses in a recent Gilmore Girls thread
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern booster
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poster in the Entertainment forum who takes shows waaaaaaaaaay too seriously and writes incredibly long, self-important analyses of each episode.
Eh I think that women are as into tv shows/movies/pop culture as men are into sports.
This! The poster(s) who start every response with “eh” or “meh”.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poster in the Entertainment forum who takes shows waaaaaaaaaay too seriously and writes incredibly long, self-important analyses of each episode.
I love this poster or posters. Reading or listening in depth analysis of TV shows I enjoy is a longtime hobby of mine. I used to love the Television Without Pity recaps (some of them were like 25 pages long for ONE episode) and the Tom & Lorenzo "Mad Style" recaps of Mad Men episodes as interpreted through the costuming and set design. Seriously one of my top 10 favorite things about the internet.
Anonymous wrote:The (I presume) guys who engage in pointless fundamentalist Christian vs. atheist debates in the religion forum. I imagine them chortling, "Ha HA! What about THIS!" as they consult their book of logical fallacies and throw around Latin terms they don't understand, all to go around in pointless circles. They should just accept that they are yin to the other's yang.
Anonymous wrote:- lady who thinks anyone who marries before age 26 is a dropout teen mom. They couldn't possibly have enough brain development for marriage.
- person who calls everyone on the job forum a dinosaur or boomer when someone disagrees with them
- lady who has been ranting in the beauty forum and telling everyone their recommendations are ugly or for 80 year olds