Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to recruit undergrads for a Fortune 500 company. We usually assumed we could not afford an analyst from HYPSM and for the instances that we did hire them, they left after a year of top range pay. Got a lot of " I TOLD YOU SOs". We were accused of "overhiring".
People are only as loyal as their options, and HYPSM grads have no shortage of options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to recruit undergrads for a Fortune 500 company. We usually assumed we could not afford an analyst from HYPSM and for the instances that we did hire them, they left after a year of top range pay. Got a lot of " I TOLD YOU SOs". We were accused of "overhiring".
People are only as loyal as their options, and HYPSM grads have no shortage of options.
A Fortune 500 company could have afforded to pay more to keep them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you’re a URM it’s a downside because people assume you didn’t get in on your own merits.
I don’t assume this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to recruit undergrads for a Fortune 500 company. We usually assumed we could not afford an analyst from HYPSM and for the instances that we did hire them, they left after a year of top range pay. Got a lot of " I TOLD YOU SOs". We were accused of "overhiring".
People are only as loyal as their options, and HYPSM grads have no shortage of options.
Anonymous wrote:I used to recruit undergrads for a Fortune 500 company. We usually assumed we could not afford an analyst from HYPSM and for the instances that we did hire them, they left after a year of top range pay. Got a lot of " I TOLD YOU SOs". We were accused of "overhiring".
Anonymous wrote:I am not an elite school alum but I’ve been part of hiring committees at companies where these kids apply for jobs alongside kids from other schools.
The biggest downside I’ve witnessed is people making certain assumptions about the kid because of the school. Lets be honest, when someone comes from Princeton, people think, yes, he must be smart but also that he is likely an entitled and spoiled little brat. Nobody hears Princeton and thinks smart, hard working LMC kid.
State and lower ranked school grads don’t have to overcome that bias. People tend to assume that they will be more humble and willing to do the grunt work. People make these assumptions purely based on the school name without knowing anything about the kid. The reality could very well be that the kid from Princeton is LMC and humble and the state school kid is a brat.
Anonymous wrote:Have you seen the vitriol on this board? Specifically with MIT people on here have said I didn't deserve to go there, wouldn't get in today, etc. That hate and jealously I experienced in real life as well. From people decades ahead of me in their careers that had nothing to feel insecure about. I learned early on to find supporters and stay far away from the people that wished me harm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If asked - say where you went to school.
I do. But honestly it's often a d*mned if you do or don't scenario. While I never bring it up (Harvard grad), if asked, I'm honest. Last week the response was a (cue sarcastic voice...)"oooooh, SMARTY PANTS, aren't you? Whoooooaaaaa. You don't act like you went to Harvard." blah blah blah for a full two minutes. Cringeworthy, super uncomfortable.
This happens more often than you might expect. Which is why it's tempting to say I "went to school in Boston."
That’s the glory of Stanford. I just say I “went to school on the West Coast.” No one ever asks where.
False. They all ask. It's called polite conversation.
No, they don't. I went there . No one says "west coast". no one. that's just stupid. It's a myth that harvard people say "a small college in cambridge" but that's also false and you just copied that. No one who goes to stanford says that. you're just trying to copy the harvard line