Anonymous wrote:Many people here do not realize how difficult it is to get appropriate treatment for a mentally ill family member.
As others have pointed out, even if a person is determined to be a danger to himself or others, they are hospitalized only briefly. Psychiatrists in this area are hard to get into and are essentially private pay. Add to that the issue that the particular illness may not be amenable to medication but may need specialized therapy that is not widely available.
That leaves very expensive private pay inpatient options, most of which have limited or no insurance coverage. We are looking into that now for our family member, but the financial implications are considerable.
Yes, we keep the person at home and battle the medication out with him. For those not in this situation, be grateful we don't put him on the streets. If there is anything the world doesn't need it is one more mentally ill homeless person.
Anonymous wrote:I cannot recall the name but I am sure someone on this thread remembers the story of the Virginia senator (state, I think?) whose psychotic son seriously injured him and then took his own life a few years back. I bring it up because it is the perfect illustration of how even if you have a dedicated parent actively seeking help for a mentally ill child who is willing to get treatment, and even if that parent has ample financial resources and is more politically powerful than 99% of the population, it can still be impossible to get a bed while in a mental health crisis. Beyond that any of us who have any experience with the system know that even IF you get a bed, treatment falls far short. I once involuntarily committed a guy to the state mental hospital two days after his family cut him down from a tree and resuscitated him after he had hung himself. Our hearing was in the morning, he arrived at the state hospital a few hours later and I got a fax noticing me of his release from the state hospital four days later. I stirred the pot all the way up the food chain but could not get them to keep him longer - they put him on psych meds that take weeks to take effect and sent him home to the Rez where aftercare resources were practically nonexistent - but he had a plan! for what he could do if the resources existed. I don’t blame the hospitals - they are overrun and understaffed and simply don’t have the resources to provide the appropriate care. The only people who stay long term are the ones on forensic orders - the ‘criminally insane’ who have committed serious crimes of violence.
Does everyone see the disconnect? Of course you do. But not in the voting booth.
Anonymous wrote:Many people here do not realize how difficult it is to get appropriate treatment for a mentally ill family member.
As others have pointed out, even if a person is determined to be a danger to himself or others, they are hospitalized only briefly. Psychiatrists in this area are hard to get into and are essentially private pay. Add to that the issue that the particular illness may not be amenable to medication but may need specialized therapy that is not widely available.
That leaves very expensive private pay inpatient options, most of which have limited or no insurance coverage. We are looking into that now for our family member, but the financial implications are considerable.
Yes, we keep the person at home and battle the medication out with him. For those not in this situation, be grateful we don't put him on the streets. If there is anything the world doesn't need it is one more mentally ill homeless person.