Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
HOW they got in? We need to stop kidding ourselves about junk like this!
Outside of literally a few kids of massive donors, all kids at these colleges have to be impressive in multiple ways (legacy kids, recruited athletes, and all sexes and races included). You'll never truly know the "how." For example, I went to high school with a relative of a pro sports team owner. She was supremely qualified as a student, leader, and major EC award winner but I'm sure many at her top college made assumptions based on who in her family had gone there and their known history of generocity.
Oh puhleeze, there are many who get in not really because they were such great students. Have you been living under a rock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
HOW they got in? We need to stop kidding ourselves about junk like this!
Outside of literally a few kids of massive donors, all kids at these colleges have to be impressive in multiple ways (legacy kids, recruited athletes, and all sexes and races included). You'll never truly know the "how." For example, I went to high school with a relative of a pro sports team owner. She was supremely qualified as a student, leader, and major EC award winner but I'm sure many at her top college made assumptions based on who in her family had gone there and their known history of generocity.
This “supremely qualified” classmate of yours also had unlimited resources. Not as impressive as another supremely qualified student from a poor family
Given that resources do vary so much, we shouldn't be looking at just the highest GPA, test scores, and often BS ECs on their face! Being a "qualified student" just can't be easily compared and context matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
HOW they got in? We need to stop kidding ourselves about junk like this!
Outside of literally a few kids of massive donors, all kids at these colleges have to be impressive in multiple ways (legacy kids, recruited athletes, and all sexes and races included). You'll never truly know the "how." For example, I went to high school with a relative of a pro sports team owner. She was supremely qualified as a student, leader, and major EC award winner but I'm sure many at her top college made assumptions based on who in her family had gone there and their known history of generocity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
HOW they got in? We need to stop kidding ourselves about junk like this!
Outside of literally a few kids of massive donors, all kids at these colleges have to be impressive in multiple ways (legacy kids, recruited athletes, and all sexes and races included). You'll never truly know the "how." For example, I went to high school with a relative of a pro sports team owner. She was supremely qualified as a student, leader, and major EC award winner but I'm sure many at her top college made assumptions based on who in her family had gone there and their known history of generocity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
This last how comment is just sad. Did someone less deserving also get "your" promotion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
You missed the part where I said it all depends on HOW the student got in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Pretty much any college is impressive then
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
To an extent. Pretty much any field (with possibly some exceptions) can be impressive if that's what they are interested and good in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
and WHAT they are studying
Anonymous wrote:Frankly, I would not automatically be impressed with ANY of these colleges. It all depends on HOW they got in!
Anonymous wrote:Very impressed - HYPSM Caltech Wharton
Impressed - Columbia, Penn, Chicago, Northwestern, Duke, Brown, Dartmouth