Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Height does not matter one iota for women. As long as you are over 5’1”, you have every option. -5ft9in woman.
This is not exactly true. I have met several men who have told people that they are looking for tall women to have children with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When i met my wife she was over 200 lbs and for awhile she wouldn't go out with me because she thought because of "the way I looked" I wouldn't date someone like her. I honestly will say that most men are not as shallow as women make them to be. We value personality and other attributes.
Was she rich?
Anonymous wrote:When i met my wife she was over 200 lbs and for awhile she wouldn't go out with me because she thought because of "the way I looked" I wouldn't date someone like her. I honestly will say that most men are not as shallow as women make them to be. We value personality and other attributes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women are way more generous with what they find attractive and it’s not even close. If you don’t fit within a very standard definition of female beauty, most men under the age 50 will be embarrassed to admit his attraction to you to other men and he certainly won’t publicly date or marry you. I agree with PP, it’s disingenuous to say otherwise.
Yet below average women get married every day.
Maybe that was true 50-100 years ago, but think of all the weddings you’ve seen in the past 10 years in any age group. The woman is almost always more or less standardly good looking and on the thin to average side, or there’s some way where the groom is punching above his weight in terms of looks. And If she’s obese then the guy is too, but there are way more thin/average women who will marry fatter men. So I disagree, you do not see below average women marrying very often and never where there is a disparity in looks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are the same type of men who will bemoan about gold-diggers and/or women having no substance or depth to their personalities. We’ve all dated someone who we weren’t attracted to initially, but we grew to appreciate them due to their character and charm.
Like anyone else, attraction is important to me as well, but I’ve always given a man who shows interest in me a moment of my time.
Whereas if a woman is unattractive to a man, he will act as if she doesn’t exist.
Fellas, you’re free to date whomever you want, but you’re digging yourself into a hole of vapid connections and failed situationships with your shallow mentality.
What?? I’m a woman and I’ve never dated someone I wasn’t attracted to initially.
Same. Though I have dated unattractive guys that were attractive to *me*.
Anonymous wrote:These are the same type of men who will bemoan about gold-diggers and/or women having no substance or depth to their personalities. We’ve all dated someone who we weren’t attracted to initially, but we grew to appreciate them due to their character and charm.
Like anyone else, attraction is important to me as well, but I’ve always given a man who shows interest in me a moment of my time.
Whereas if a woman is unattractive to a man, he will act as if she doesn’t exist.
Fellas, you’re free to date whomever you want, but you’re digging yourself into a hole of vapid connections and failed situationships with your shallow mentality.
Anonymous wrote:These are the same type of men who will bemoan about gold-diggers and/or women having no substance or depth to their personalities. We’ve all dated someone who we weren’t attracted to initially, but we grew to appreciate them due to their character and charm.
Like anyone else, attraction is important to me as well, but I’ve always given a man who shows interest in me a moment of my time.
Whereas if a woman is unattractive to a man, he will act as if she doesn’t exist.
Fellas, you’re free to date whomever you want, but you’re digging yourself into a hole of vapid connections and failed situationships with your shallow mentality.
Anonymous wrote:These are the same type of men who will bemoan about gold-diggers and/or women having no substance or depth to their personalities. We’ve all dated someone who we weren’t attracted to initially, but we grew to appreciate them due to their character and charm.
Like anyone else, attraction is important to me as well, but I’ve always given a man who shows interest in me a moment of my time.
Whereas if a woman is unattractive to a man, he will act as if she doesn’t exist.
Fellas, you’re free to date whomever you want, but you’re digging yourself into a hole of vapid connections and failed situationships with your shallow mentality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are the same type of men who will bemoan about gold-diggers and/or women having no substance or depth to their personalities. We’ve all dated someone who we weren’t attracted to initially, but we grew to appreciate them due to their character and charm.
Like anyone else, attraction is important to me as well, but I’ve always given a man who shows interest in me a moment of my time.
Whereas if a woman is unattractive to a man, he will act as if she doesn’t exist.
Fellas, you’re free to date whomever you want, but you’re digging yourself into a hole of vapid connections and failed situationships with your shallow mentality.
What?? I’m a woman and I’ve never dated someone I wasn’t attracted to initially.
Same. Though I have dated unattractive guys that were attractive to *me*.
Slightly off-topic, but is anyone else turned on by unattractive men who are irrationality confident?
Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone date ANYONE they are not attracted to? This does not compute.
Regardless of appearance/height/attractive attributes/common values/whatever- if 'attraction' itself-for whatever reason- is not there, wth would anyone date someone? I'm not superficial but that makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.
5 foot 8 woman here.
A 5 foot 7 man would have to be perfect: Handsome, kind. Sweet, lean, neat etc.
A 6'3 man could be missing an arm and a leg, and have one eye. and I would pick him first.
Quite happy to be a 6’3” man with both arms and legs and two good eyes. The dating pool is terrific. Seriously.
And I'm the 5'7" guy. It's rough out there for me. I guess I need to get rich.