Anonymous wrote:Liberty, Oral Roberts, Hillsdale, Patrick Henry, BYU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are lots of parents who will only contribute financially toward tuition if their child attends a certain college deemed appropriate.
It’s a shame they are limiting their kids’ futures.
My parents did this and I believe it gave me the best possible life. I will do the same with my kids. I believe it limits them to pretend that whatever they want is a viable option. Living in the real world means understanding where money comes from and why it’s important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are lots of parents who will only contribute financially toward tuition if their child attends a certain college deemed appropriate.
It’s a shame they are limiting their kids’ futures.
My parents did this and I believe it gave me the best possible life. I will do the same with my kids. I believe it limits them to pretend that whatever they want is a viable option. Living in the real world means understanding where money comes from and why it’s important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are lots of parents who will only contribute financially toward tuition if their child attends a certain college deemed appropriate.
It’s a shame they are limiting their kids’ futures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are lots of parents who will only contribute financially toward tuition if their child attends a certain college deemed appropriate.
It’s a shame they are limiting their kids’ futures.
Anonymous wrote:There are lots of parents who will only contribute financially toward tuition if their child attends a certain college deemed appropriate.
Anonymous wrote:No, not really - I know that their school doesn’t define them. I do take into account major though. But a bigger detraction is that I probably wouldn’t hire someone who put their pronouns on their resume. And I’m not talked about gender neutral pronouns like they/them, I’m also talking about even if a women put she/her/hers or a man put he/him/his. I’m liberal, but I would assume that employee may be potentially difficult. [/quote]
I think you are wrong. First, for younger people this much more normal, certainly not a sign of being difficult. and frankly my old self lkes it too. Maybe if you work in a tiny town where you deal only with Mary Smith and John Brown you dont care, but I communicate in writing (mostly email now) with gazillion of people who have names i have no idead if they are a she or a he, even just to stay in the dual category. multiple times i had to google the person to see if it was a Ms. or Mr. or what. so yes, he/she can be just useful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in hiring based on religion. Just an FYI as many of you gleefully post you discriminate against Christian university grads.
Thankfully, Christians attend a variety of universities. Nice try though. Don’t choose to go to a controversial university.
The bigotry, for example, against Liberty Univ grads is without a question based on their perceived religious beliefs. Nice try!
Lol no. Google their “biology” curriculum. They use workbooks.
The intent has nothing to do with a textbook. It's the religion. This post hoc rationalization would be transparent in litigation.
FCPS has no books according to this thread. Maybe universities shouldn't take them. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1111832.page
College name is not a protected class. If it is, every Radford or Salisbury student, ever, should sue McKinsey & Company for systemic discrimination.
It's the practice of not hiring based on religion that is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Getting to that intent is what discovery of things like emails, texts, and depositions is for.
Where are you getting this from? I’ll hire a student of any religion who attended any college BUT Liberty. No discrimination there.
You don’t think you’d have a disparate impact issue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Religious scam unis, like Liberty.
Lots of students attend Liberty and other religious schools for cost and convenience. They avoid religious aspects and focus on rest of the education. It would be unfair to discriminate against them. If any, they add some intellectual diversity to these schools and develop good insight about what's going on there. They can become reformers, when given a chance.
Well, their career center needs an upgrade. The resumes I see coming out of places like Liberty might as well be a handwritten scrawl on a napkin. Pure trash. I'm willing to keep an open mind, but again, you need to compete.
Well, if your judgment is based on bad resumes, that’s valid.
I probably do have my biases against these schools, but I've also never seen a great resume from one so it's not exactly discrimination either. They need to do better. They're not sending out their graduates into the world appearing prepared.
We can’t help sometimes the biases we carry, but we can help how we act on them. If they send bad resumes, it doesn’t matter where they went to school.
I worked with 2 people early in my career that went to the University of Central Florida. They were both bigots and both useless at work. One was a female minority and one was a white male. The white male was bigoted against me personally. I was friendly with the Mom of the other and later learned the daughter was pretty racist against her boss….because I went to work for him.
As much as I disliked these people and thought they were both unskilled and nasty, I would not assume all graduates from that school are reflective of their example, particularly so many years later.
Conversely, I’ve had a couple fantastic coworkers who went to Mason. One was clearly not well educated in the subject matter but wow did he make up for it in work ethic and interpersonal skill. I now have a good opinion of people who went to Mason, because I feel the school may not be great but it attracts students interested in getting their work done and starting a career. It’s been my experience. I’m sure some people graduate from there and are terrible to work with, and also don’t have the education. But, my bias is positive. It works in all directions. Each applicant should have a set of qualifications that go into the consideration. It should never be one factor.
Mason is actually a very good school, especially for majors that are integrated with local businesses and agencies, like education for example. Mason is actually my go-to school for hiring. I have never been let down. And before I was doing the hiring, it was the preferred school for my bosses, and that was because the candidates already knew how things are done in our industry in the DMV.