Anonymous wrote:Top majors matter much more for non-rich, non-trust fund kids.
Anonymous wrote:Fit is more important than ranking, especially if we’re talking about the 5-50 ranked schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cal has an amazing reputation on the West Coast and in East Asia. For some reason, it gets lumped in with Michigan or Michigan and UVA a lot here (probably because they are great public schools). In California, the discussion starts with Stanford and Cal.
Stanford and CalTech
Even for CS and most eng fields, it would be all 3 (Stanford, Cal, and CalTech...my years at Stanford probably affect the ordering there). In general though, it would be the 2. CalTech and UCLA are great too and undervalued here. The same could be said about Pomona and CMC in terms of SLACs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cal has an amazing reputation on the West Coast and in East Asia. For some reason, it gets lumped in with Michigan or Michigan and UVA a lot here (probably because they are great public schools). In California, the discussion starts with Stanford and Cal.
Stanford and CalTech
Anonymous wrote:Cal has an amazing reputation on the West Coast and in East Asia. For some reason, it gets lumped in with Michigan or Michigan and UVA a lot here (probably because they are great public schools). In California, the discussion starts with Stanford and Cal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USNWR undergraduate academic reputation assessment survey scores:
4.9: Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8: Princeton Yale
4.7: Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6: UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5: Duke Michigan
4.4: Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3: Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon GaTech UVA
4.2: Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown UNC-CH
4.1: Rice, UT Austin Wisconsin-Madison
Are big public schools really that great at the undergrad level though?
Yes, for the right kids.
No they are not. Public schools get a boost from grad school. They are large and accept a ton of students, in turn deans at a lot of unis give them high ratings.
You sound delusional.
Nothing about Berkeley is a 4.7, or UVA a 4.3. Live with it.
Please contact those behind virtually every modern college ranking and notify them of their errors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USNWR undergraduate academic reputation assessment survey scores:
4.9: Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8: Princeton Yale
4.7: Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6: UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5: Duke Michigan
4.4: Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3: Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon GaTech UVA
4.2: Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown UNC-CH
4.1: Rice, UT Austin Wisconsin-Madison
Are big public schools really that great at the undergrad level though?
Yes, for the right kids.
No they are not. Public schools get a boost from grad school. They are large and accept a ton of students, in turn deans at a lot of unis give them high ratings.
You sound delusional.
Nothing about Berkeley is a 4.7, or UVA a 4.3. Live with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USNWR undergraduate academic reputation assessment survey scores:
4.9: Harvard MIT Stanford
4.8: Princeton Yale
4.7: Columbia JHU Berkeley
4.6: UChicago Penn Caltech Cornell
4.5: Duke Michigan
4.4: Northwestern Brown Dartmouth UCLA
4.3: Vanderbilt Carnegie Mellon GaTech UVA
4.2: Wash U Emory Notre Dame Georgetown UNC-CH
4.1: Rice, UT Austin Wisconsin-Madison
Are big public schools really that great at the undergrad level though?
Yes, for the right kids.
No they are not. Public schools get a boost from grad school. They are large and accept a ton of students, in turn deans at a lot of unis give them high ratings.
You sound delusional.
Nothing about Berkeley is a 4.7, or UVA a 4.3. Live with it.