Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1.2 million is an ok start.
I always assumed that California was one of the few “safe” states for black Americans fleeing the South. Not realizing until recently that it was just as racist. With that being said, anyone who believes reparations will ever be paid is delusional.
Wrong. It’s a very left wing state. This will be paid, as it should be. There may be a handful of moderate Dems in the state assembly who say know, but the margins are huge, in favor of progressives.
How, exactly?
After 2 years of massive surplus, California is facing a $24B budget deficit.
Who will magically pay for this?
The billionaires who live there.
LOL. You think they are going to stick around to be milked by this ruse? Think again.
Sure, why not? They stick around now, even though it would be in their financial interest to relocate. And most are extremely liberal—thus, this is consistent with their values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1.2 million is an ok start.
I always assumed that California was one of the few “safe” states for black Americans fleeing the South. Not realizing until recently that it was just as racist. With that being said, anyone who believes reparations will ever be paid is delusional.
Wrong. It’s a very left wing state. This will be paid, as it should be. There may be a handful of moderate Dems in the state assembly who say know, but the margins are huge, in favor of progressives.
How, exactly?
After 2 years of massive surplus, California is facing a $24B budget deficit.
Who will magically pay for this?
The billionaires who live there.
LOL. You think they are going to stick around to be milked by this ruse? Think again.
Sure, why not? They stick around now, even though it would be in their financial interest to relocate. And most are extremely liberal—thus, this is consistent with their values.
The billionaires are a lot less liberal than they appear. They are already moving operations out of CA.
So, I think it is 100% nuts that California, which was never a slave state, is going to force its non-black residents (who were not slave owners) to fork over billions of dollars to black residents (who were not slaves). Nevertheless, part of me is giddy about the prospect of this because it's basically a giant gift to the right. But then the other part of me thinks that is gross and sick to wish this kind of economic and social destruction on California. Even if it is self inflicted.
I'm happy CA is going down this path; their voters are basically getting what they voted for - good for them. They can hand over all their money to the govt and let them redistribute as they see fit. For the minority voters in CA who don't agree, you can either suck it up, or move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1.2 million is an ok start.
I always assumed that California was one of the few “safe” states for black Americans fleeing the South. Not realizing until recently that it was just as racist. With that being said, anyone who believes reparations will ever be paid is delusional.
Wrong. It’s a very left wing state. This will be paid, as it should be. There may be a handful of moderate Dems in the state assembly who say know, but the margins are huge, in favor of progressives.
How, exactly?
After 2 years of massive surplus, California is facing a $24B budget deficit.
Who will magically pay for this?
The billionaires who live there.
LOL. You think they are going to stick around to be milked by this ruse? Think again.
Sure, why not? They stick around now, even though it would be in their financial interest to relocate. And most are extremely liberal—thus, this is consistent with their values.
The billionaires are a lot less liberal than they appear. They are already moving operations out of CA.
So, I think it is 100% nuts that California, which was never a slave state, is going to force its non-black residents (who were not slave owners) to fork over billions of dollars to black residents (who were not slaves). Nevertheless, part of me is giddy about the prospect of this because it's basically a giant gift to the right. But then the other part of me thinks that is gross and sick to wish this kind of economic and social destruction on California. Even if it is self inflicted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1.2 million is an ok start.
I always assumed that California was one of the few “safe” states for black Americans fleeing the South. Not realizing until recently that it was just as racist. With that being said, anyone who believes reparations will ever be paid is delusional.
Wrong. It’s a very left wing state. This will be paid, as it should be. There may be a handful of moderate Dems in the state assembly who say know, but the margins are huge, in favor of progressives.
How, exactly?
After 2 years of massive surplus, California is facing a $24B budget deficit.
Who will magically pay for this?
The billionaires who live there.
LOL. You think they are going to stick around to be milked by this ruse? Think again.
Sure, why not? They stick around now, even though it would be in their financial interest to relocate. And most are extremely liberal—thus, this is consistent with their values.
Anonymous wrote:If nothing else, this is really softening the ground for similar movements in other states and, ultimately, at the federal level. No one really has a philosophical argument against it (or is willing to state such an argument in public), so the arguments are really fall back ones like, yeah, uhhhhh, that sounds good, but the logistics, the money. The money is there, and this country can surely reasonably identify those who are entitled to payments.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is the future for America.
California leads, and only reparations can heal the legacy of slavery.
Bravo California.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If nothing else, this is really softening the ground for similar movements in other states and, ultimately, at the federal level. No one really has a philosophical argument against it (or is willing to state such an argument in public), so the arguments are really fall back ones like, yeah, uhhhhh, that sounds good, but the logistics, the money. The money is there, and this country can surely reasonably identify those who are entitled to payments.
Im willing to state the "philosophical" argument against this. It is wrong to take property and cash from one group of people and give it to another group of people because of what their ancestors may or may not have done.
Anonymous wrote:If nothing else, this is really softening the ground for similar movements in other states and, ultimately, at the federal level. No one really has a philosophical argument against it (or is willing to state such an argument in public), so the arguments are really fall back ones like, yeah, uhhhhh, that sounds good, but the logistics, the money. The money is there, and this country can surely reasonably identify those who are entitled to payments.