Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Assuming you’re on twitter, what do the follow ups to this say? I’m not a twitter user and can no longer see anything.
Not a lot of comments but the full chart is pretty significant if you can’t see the whole thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And the WI constitution specifically requires the districts to be contiguous, but the republicans in the legislature and courts have just ignored that.
This is insane. The constitution requires contiguous and the WI Republicans just straight up broke the law with the support of the SC?
F#cking unreal.
Anonymous wrote:
Assuming you’re on twitter, what do the follow ups to this say? I’m not a twitter user and can no longer see anything.
Anonymous wrote:
And the WI constitution specifically requires the districts to be contiguous, but the republicans in the legislature and courts have just ignored that.
Anonymous wrote:I am hoping that the good people of Wisconsin can live with their vote. Could be good, could be bad, could be neutral.
I don’t worry much about maps because people are individuals and their politics shift when their own lives are affected.
Anonymous wrote:I am hoping that the good people of Wisconsin can live with their vote. Could be good, could be bad, could be neutral.
I don’t worry much about maps because people are individuals and their politics shift when their own lives are affected.