Anonymous wrote:You all are so dramatic about an extra piece of skin. Spaying/neutering pets is far far worse and that seems ok to people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes.
(Either is fine and I fully support letting the male parent choose if there is one.)
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not American and never considered circumcising my boys.
Same. I think that a lot of Americans don't realize how out of the norm this practice is compared with other countries.
I think a lot of Americans don't realize how normal this practice is in countries with majority Jewish and Muslim populations. Earth is more than America and Europe.
America is the only country were circumcision is common if you aren’t Muslim or Jewish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I could go back I would not circumcise. It was 30 years ago and I didn’t know any better.
Have you asked your son about that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a surgeon. In med school when I saw the procedure being done, I vowed I not only never, ever do that to my boys, not participate in it indirectly.
Circumcision is male genital mutilation. It is interesting that we in the US criticize other cultures for female genital mutilation and we do it ourselves to our boys.
The research has not played out to show a benefit to doing this at a population level. If a man engages in high risk sexual behaviors where the procedure might be beneficial, he could get the procedure himself at his own decision. I will support my sons in this regard if needed.
Female mutilation is to keep girls chaste and ensure modesty enforced by the male society. The form of Female mutilation you are comparing to circumcision is cutting off a female's clitoris. This is means she will never have enjoyment sensation out of sex. Circumcision does not affect this for men. NOT a good comparison so stop making it.
This. The "surgeon" doesn't seem to understand that the male equivalent of female mutilation is castration. Circumcision is not castration.
Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't we be asking the boys if they are happy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not American and never considered circumcising my boys.
Same. I think that a lot of Americans don't realize how out of the norm this practice is compared with other countries.
I think a lot of Americans don't realize how normal this practice is in countries with majority Jewish and Muslim populations. Earth is more than America and Europe.
America is the only country were circumcision is common if you aren’t Muslim or Jewish
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not American and never considered circumcising my boys.
Same. I think that a lot of Americans don't realize how out of the norm this practice is compared with other countries.
I think a lot of Americans don't realize how normal this practice is in countries with majority Jewish and Muslim populations. Earth is more than America and Europe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I didn't read much of the previous nine pages, but I have heard enough stories about boys who had to be circumcized when they were older because of painful conditions. I gladly had all three of my boys circumcized when they were born and, honestly, they are quite happy not to have to undergo the procedure at an age when they would have had a painful recovery.
I'd also like to add that circumcized men are far less likely to contract STDs including HIV.
Wouldn't it just be easier for men to be more selective in their sexual partners?
Anonymous wrote:If I could go back I would not circumcise. It was 30 years ago and I didn’t know any better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not American and never considered circumcising my boys.
Same. I think that a lot of Americans don't realize how out of the norm this practice is compared with other countries.
Anonymous wrote:For anyone who is contemplating how to move forward with an expected male infant, I highly recommend the documentary American Circumcision.