Anonymous wrote:For the rationalists and apologists, I have a sincere question. Do you care about this particular brand’s survival? Are you upset about cancel culture? Is this a speech rights issue for you? Do you think the allusions are acceptable?
I personally think the brand should die and a strong message should be sent, but I’m curious how others can feel so differently…
Absolutely not, in fact I've been hating on most of what they've done under the current designer (except some of the CG assist tailoring). Might as well say they have no bearing on the circles I run in anyway, but if they were to disappear I wouldn't care. (I also don't really go in for the genius of Cristóbal.)
However, this is a manufactured controversy. There is no porn in the child campaign. I'm more interested in the fact that actual adults would by these objects, way to bury the lede. The campaign with the Easter eggs, either someone in editorial went rouge or they collectively made a calculated play for q-anon eyeballs. I wouldn't kick that hornets nest myself, but I'll bring out the popcorn for it--worm brain v. Kering, evenly matched evil, IMO.