Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rosedale sent out an email survey in November 2022 saying that they're reconsidering their dog waitlist policy. Has anyone heard any updates?

They just posted an update. Main change is that only residents within a defined geographical area can join the waitlist.

https://www.rosedaleconservancy.org/dog-registration/

I’m sure the people who claim to live in apartments on Connecticut Ave will find something else to complain about.

I posted that before I saw the map. They actually decided specifically to exclude all of the large apartment buildings on Connecticut but instead include buildings in Cleveland Park on Wisconsin that are already close to the public dog park. LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rosedale sent out an email survey in November 2022 saying that they're reconsidering their dog waitlist policy. Has anyone heard any updates?

They just posted an update. Main change is that only residents within a defined geographical area can join the waitlist.

https://www.rosedaleconservancy.org/dog-registration/

I’m sure the people who claim to live in apartments on Connecticut Ave will find something else to complain about.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rosedale sent out an email survey in November 2022 saying that they're reconsidering their dog waitlist policy. Has anyone heard any updates?

They just posted an update. Main change is that only residents within a defined geographical area can join the waitlist.

https://www.rosedaleconservancy.org/dog-registration/

Anonymous wrote:Rosedale sent out an email survey in November 2022 saying that they're reconsidering their dog waitlist policy. Has anyone heard any updates?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same scenario as to how Rosedale Conservatory came to be happened in the area I currently live in this past fall. The group came across as very NIMBY.

What?

A farm was bought by a “neighborhood group” who wanted to block housing development and turn the farm into a nature preserve.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The same scenario as to how Rosedale Conservatory came to be happened in the area I currently live in this past fall. The group came across as very NIMBY.

What?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:does anyone remember going there before all of the signs were up? I used to go all of the time with my dog and saw nothing about needing a special tag.

Then you must be thinking of 25 years ago when Youth for Understanding owned the property and informally let people take their dogs in. It was a weedy dust bowl then. Rosedale Conservancy has always required registration and tags. Rosedale today is an incredible asset for CP.

DP. Rosedale was *not* a “weedy dust bowl then.” Rosedale has always been an “incredible asset” for the neighborhood.

The arrogant Rosedale defenders here are not doing anything to counteract the negative impression of those running the Conservancy. To the contrary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:does anyone remember going there before all of the signs were up? I used to go all of the time with my dog and saw nothing about needing a special tag.

Then you must be thinking of 25 years ago when Youth for Understanding owned the property and informally let people take their dogs in. It was a weedy dust bowl then. Rosedale Conservancy has always required registration and tags. Rosedale today is an incredible asset for CP.

Anonymous wrote:The same scenario as to how Rosedale Conservatory came to be happened in the area I currently live in this past fall. The group came across as very NIMBY.