Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP. If separation of church and state is a Christian principle, why did it take 1600 years of Christianity for Christians to figure that out? I'm a Christian and I believe in freedom of religion, but it's not inherent in Christianity.
“Render unto Caesar what is due Caesar and unto God what is due God.” (Matthew 22:15-22, Mark 12:14-17 and Luke 20:29-26).
Separation of church and state is definitely part of Christianity. Whether or not the ancient Greeks had it too. (The claim that it can’t exist in Christianity because somebody else had the same thought is a little silly—did the Greeks have a patent on that idea?) Whether or not Europe went through centuries of the “divine right of kings,” and BTW the whole idea of anointing kings is more an OT thing anyway.
If you can't see the incredible irony of your post - where you claim the Greeks don't get credit for an idea they had centuries before the birth of Christ but somehow that same idea can be claimed as a uniquely "judeo christian value" -- well, wow, you should see that irony. Because it is really ironic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP. If separation of church and state is a Christian principle, why did it take 1600 years of Christianity for Christians to figure that out? I'm a Christian and I believe in freedom of religion, but it's not inherent in Christianity.
“Render unto Caesar what is due Caesar and unto God what is due God.” (Matthew 22:15-22, Mark 12:14-17 and Luke 20:29-26).
Separation of church and state is definitely part of Christianity. Whether or not the ancient Greeks had it too. (The claim that it can’t exist in Christianity because somebody else had the same thought is a little silly—did the Greeks have a patent on that idea?) Whether or not Europe went through centuries of the “divine right of kings,” and BTW the whole idea of anointing kings is more an OT thing anyway.
Anonymous wrote:
DP. If separation of church and state is a Christian principle, why did it take 1600 years of Christianity for Christians to figure that out? I'm a Christian and I believe in freedom of religion, but it's not inherent in Christianity.
Anonymous wrote:You don't want to engage thoughtfully, but then here you are responding again and again and again with nothing but insults. If you had a good response you would give it. But you don't, you give only ad homs and insults. THAT'S why I win.
And here is a piece of sincere advice with good intent: learn to use the codes and the preview button, people are missing your posts because you don't.
Anonymous wrote:
This is just a lie. If your logic works I could publish a book with the Pythagorean formula in it and claim it is my principle. Make NO sense, sorry. Not how it works. Pythagoras gets the credit, no matter how many mathematicians post it again.
This is a silly whataboutism. If you came up with the Pythagorean theorem two millennia after Pythagorus did (using your example), then you both invented it. Happens all the time with convergent evolution.
You’re unable to accept that Christianity came up with something independently, but you have no proof that didn’t happen. You’re also unable to accept that the founding fathers, whether deists or not (and definitely not atheists) were steeped in Christian values like the separation of church and state. Which is so odd, because both of us are arguing in favor of separation of church and state. It’s almost like you just like to argue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know that secularism existed for centuries before the birth of Christ, right? So, fail. See: Ancient Greece for starters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism#History
Doesn’t make them any less Christian principles. And in both Greece and Rome the state funded temples. Your point?
Uhhh.. yes it does. Are you saying any idea that is also in the bible that the bible gets credit for? Sorry, that's not how ideas work. Those ideas existed for centuries, they are not "christian principles". They are "human principles". You can't just claim them because you want to and ignore the earlier sources.
Do you ever get tired of your “fight me” approach and generally being a pugnacious jerk?
Do you ever get tired of resorting to ad hominem when you don't have a salient point? I can get how that must be frustrating.
but then of course you declare victory based on the lack of responses …
Yes, that is generally how debates work.
because nobody wants to engage with pugnacious jerks. Hmmm, maybe a different approach would net you more real discussion. That is, if you were genuinely interested in discussion, which you’re not. Bye.
Yes I am, and despite your ad hominems, I am doing exactly that.
The sleazy logic here would be embarrassing for you if you had any self-awareness.
- the separation of church and state may have existed in Ancient Greece but that takes nothing away from it being a Christian principle too. It’s like arguing, the ancient Greeks wore white, therefore white wedding gowns aren’t a modern custom. Very strange and patently dishonest argumentation.
- people don’t reply to you because you’re obnoxious and you argue in bad faith. Not because you’re right. You can’t even see that your claim that “silence means I win” proves this exact point about your dishonest rhetorical style.
The sleazy logic here would be embarrassing for you if you had any self-awareness.
- the separation of church and state may have existed in Ancient Greece but that takes nothing away from it being a Christian principle too. It’s like arguing, the ancient Greeks wore white, therefore white wedding gowns aren’t a modern custom. Very strange and patently dishonest argumentation.
- people don’t reply to you because you’re obnoxious and you argue in bad faith. Not because you’re right. You can’t even see that your claim that “silence means I win” proves this exact point about your dishonest rhetorical style.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know that secularism existed for centuries before the birth of Christ, right? So, fail. See: Ancient Greece for starters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism#History
Doesn’t make them any less Christian principles. And in both Greece and Rome the state funded temples. Your point?
Uhhh.. yes it does. Are you saying any idea that is also in the bible that the bible gets credit for? Sorry, that's not how ideas work. Those ideas existed for centuries, they are not "christian principles". They are "human principles". You can't just claim them because you want to and ignore the earlier sources.
Do you ever get tired of your “fight me” approach and generally being a pugnacious jerk?
Do you ever get tired of resorting to ad hominem when you don't have a salient point? I can get how that must be frustrating.
but then of course you declare victory based on the lack of responses …
Yes, that is generally how debates work.
because nobody wants to engage with pugnacious jerks. Hmmm, maybe a different approach would net you more real discussion. That is, if you were genuinely interested in discussion, which you’re not. Bye.
Yes I am, and despite your ad hominems, I am doing exactly that.
Anonymous wrote:You know that secularism existed for centuries before the birth of Christ, right? So, fail. See: Ancient Greece for starters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism#History
Doesn’t make them any less Christian principles. And in both Greece and Rome the state funded temples. Your point?
Do you ever get tired of your “fight me” approach and generally being a pugnacious jerk?
but then of course you declare victory based on the lack of responses …
because nobody wants to engage with pugnacious jerks. Hmmm, maybe a different approach would net you more real discussion. That is, if you were genuinely interested in discussion, which you’re not. Bye.
You're kidding, right? Did you pass 8th grade history?
America was founded on the idea that individual rights come from God and not the state. That concept had never before been expressed, let alone implemented in a form of government. This is inherently the concept of Judeo/ Christian values - that we each, as individuals, are children of God and that we are created by Him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is terrifying and a big reason we care:
Most Republicans Support Declaring the United States a Christian Nation
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/09/21/most-republicans-support-declaring-the-united-states-a-christian-nation-00057736
From the article
Christian nationalism, a belief that the United States was founded as a white, Christian nation and that there is no separation between church and state, is gaining steam on the right.
Most Republicans Say Christian Nationalism Is Unconstitutional — But Still Support It
Hopefully that will explain fully to the "why do you care?" crowd.
It doesn't have to be "declared," OP. Anyone with any sense of history (you, perhaps?) knows that America was founded as on Judeo-Christian principles.
No, this is untrue. Evidence was presented earlier.
Please name those values and explain how they are uniquely judeo christian? No one will answer that, because you can't. But I would love you to try.
Anonymous wrote:You know that secularism existed for centuries before the birth of Christ, right? So, fail. See: Ancient Greece for starters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism#History
Doesn’t make them any less Christian principles. And in both Greece and Rome the state funded temples. Your point?
Do you ever get tired of your “fight me” approach and generally being a pugnacious jerk?
but then of course you declare victory based on the lack of responses …
because nobody wants to engage with pugnacious jerks. Hmmm, maybe a different approach would net you more real discussion. That is, if you were genuinely interested in discussion, which you’re not. Bye.