Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Worse SB member ever and that's sayin' something.

This has to be some kind of sock puppet who keeps writing this stuff. Compared to so many people who have been on. The SB in the last 15 years or more, Frisch has stood out as being unremarkable. He’s well spoken, pretty responsive in my experience, and has been in the mainstream on the vast majority of SB decisions. He doesn’t waste board time and he doesn’t grandstand. So why the hate? Because he’s gay? Because he has a teacher in his family?

As for supporting virtual learning during the months before a COVID vaccine was widely available, he was certainly in the mainstream for that. Only Megan differentiated herself by being grandstanding and argumentative with the Superintendent so she could walk the tightrope of looking like she supported those who wanted all buildings open while in reality staying in the mainstream and supporting temporarily virtual learning.

It just strikes me as really fishy that there is this concerted scrum of negativity about Frisch when he doesn’t stand out in actual school board meetings. He doesn’t bloviate or ask stupid questions. He doesn’t waste time. He’s not a grandstander. I don’t know what his over all track record is in terms of responsiveness but he has responded to me the few times I wrote to more than one SB rep.

Personally, the biggest red flag that screams to me about this other candidate Holly is that she brags about having Chap Peterson’s endorsement. Chap! is no progressive Democrat, so I question her bona tides as a progressive if she is touting his support.

Nope. Unless Karl has been on a concerted effort to sock puppet here since 2012, pretending to be a pregnant woman and then a young mom and someone with marriage problems and someone with stepdaughter challenges and someone with travel questions and lots of thoughts on parenting and nursing and children’s books and adoption, I’m pretty sure Jeff could tell you that my IP address is quite unlikely to be that of a gay male politician with no children. I mean, some people put a lot of time into sock puppetry, but that would be next level. Hundreds and hundreds of hours over a decade just to write something like warmly positive about himself? Unlikely.

Karl, we know it's you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the dog park attacks make me uneasy. "The gay guy without kids favors dog parents more." That is a gross look.

The simple fact is that Blake Ln should have never been considered for an ES. Big kudos to Fritsch for stopping that unnecessary and wasteful plan.

The property was purchased to be a school, and we desperately need a school in that area. Neighboring schools are over capacity. Honestly the dog park thing was the nicest gloss you could put on the straight up NIMBYism driving the opposition.

Show me the CIP data that shows that a school is desperately needed there.

I don’t know what is in the CIP, but there are more than 650 new homes opening in the Providence neighborhood in the next year. If 1% of those homes have school aged kids, Providence will be back over capacity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the dog park attacks make me uneasy. "The gay guy without kids favors dog parents more." That is a gross look.

The simple fact is that Blake Ln should have never been considered for an ES. Big kudos to Fritsch for stopping that unnecessary and wasteful plan.

The property was purchased to be a school, and we desperately need a school in that area. Neighboring schools are over capacity. Honestly the dog park thing was the nicest gloss you could put on the straight up NIMBYism driving the opposition.

Show me the CIP data that shows that a school is desperately needed there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Worse SB member ever and that's sayin' something.

This has to be some kind of sock puppet who keeps writing this stuff. Compared to so many people who have been on. The SB in the last 15 years or more, Frisch has stood out as being unremarkable. He’s well spoken, pretty responsive in my experience, and has been in the mainstream on the vast majority of SB decisions. He doesn’t waste board time and he doesn’t grandstand. So why the hate? Because he’s gay? Because he has a teacher in his family?

As for supporting virtual learning during the months before a COVID vaccine was widely available, he was certainly in the mainstream for that. Only Megan differentiated herself by being grandstanding and argumentative with the Superintendent so she could walk the tightrope of looking like she supported those who wanted all buildings open while in reality staying in the mainstream and supporting temporarily virtual learning.

It just strikes me as really fishy that there is this concerted scrum of negativity about Frisch when he doesn’t stand out in actual school board meetings. He doesn’t bloviate or ask stupid questions. He doesn’t waste time. He’s not a grandstander. I don’t know what his over all track record is in terms of responsiveness but he has responded to me the few times I wrote to more than one SB rep.

Personally, the biggest red flag that screams to me about this other candidate Holly is that she brags about having Chap Peterson’s endorsement. Chap! is no progressive Democrat, so I question her bona tides as a progressive if she is touting his support.

Karl, we know it's you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Worse SB member ever and that's sayin' something.

This has to be some kind of sock puppet who keeps writing this stuff. Compared to so many people who have been on. The SB in the last 15 years or more, Frisch has stood out as being unremarkable. He’s well spoken, pretty responsive in my experience, and has been in the mainstream on the vast majority of SB decisions. He doesn’t waste board time and he doesn’t grandstand. So why the hate? Because he’s gay? Because he has a teacher in his family?

As for supporting virtual learning during the months before a COVID vaccine was widely available, he was certainly in the mainstream for that. Only Megan differentiated herself by being grandstanding and argumentative with the Superintendent so she could walk the tightrope of looking like she supported those who wanted all buildings open while in reality staying in the mainstream and supporting temporarily virtual learning.

It just strikes me as really fishy that there is this concerted scrum of negativity about Frisch when he doesn’t stand out in actual school board meetings. He doesn’t bloviate or ask stupid questions. He doesn’t waste time. He’s not a grandstander. I don’t know what his over all track record is in terms of responsiveness but he has responded to me the few times I wrote to more than one SB rep.

Personally, the biggest red flag that screams to me about this other candidate Holly is that she brags about having Chap Peterson’s endorsement. Chap! is no progressive Democrat, so I question her bona tides as a progressive if she is touting his support.

Karl, we know it's you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Worse SB member ever and that's sayin' something.

This has to be some kind of sock puppet who keeps writing this stuff. Compared to so many people who have been on. The SB in the last 15 years or more, Frisch has stood out as being unremarkable. He’s well spoken, pretty responsive in my experience, and has been in the mainstream on the vast majority of SB decisions. He doesn’t waste board time and he doesn’t grandstand. So why the hate? Because he’s gay? Because he has a teacher in his family?

As for supporting virtual learning during the months before a COVID vaccine was widely available, he was certainly in the mainstream for that. Only Megan differentiated herself by being grandstanding and argumentative with the Superintendent so she could walk the tightrope of looking like she supported those who wanted all buildings open while in reality staying in the mainstream and supporting temporarily virtual learning.

It just strikes me as really fishy that there is this concerted scrum of negativity about Frisch when he doesn’t stand out in actual school board meetings. He doesn’t bloviate or ask stupid questions. He doesn’t waste time. He’s not a grandstander. I don’t know what his over all track record is in terms of responsiveness but he has responded to me the few times I wrote to more than one SB rep.

Personally, the biggest red flag that screams to me about this other candidate Holly is that she brags about having Chap Peterson’s endorsement. Chap! is no progressive Democrat, so I question her bona tides as a progressive if she is touting his support.

Karl, we know it's you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Worse SB member ever and that's sayin' something.

This has to be some kind of sock puppet who keeps writing this stuff. Compared to so many people who have been on. The SB in the last 15 years or more, Frisch has stood out as being unremarkable. He’s well spoken, pretty responsive in my experience, and has been in the mainstream on the vast majority of SB decisions. He doesn’t waste board time and he doesn’t grandstand. So why the hate? Because he’s gay? Because he has a teacher in his family?

As for supporting virtual learning during the months before a COVID vaccine was widely available, he was certainly in the mainstream for that. Only Megan differentiated herself by being grandstanding and argumentative with the Superintendent so she could walk the tightrope of looking like she supported those who wanted all buildings open while in reality staying in the mainstream and supporting temporarily virtual learning.

It just strikes me as really fishy that there is this concerted scrum of negativity about Frisch when he doesn’t stand out in actual school board meetings. He doesn’t bloviate or ask stupid questions. He doesn’t waste time. He’s not a grandstander. I don’t know what his over all track record is in terms of responsiveness but he has responded to me the few times I wrote to more than one SB rep.

Personally, the biggest red flag that screams to me about this other candidate Holly is that she brags about having Chap Peterson’s endorsement. Chap! is no progressive Democrat, so I question her bona tides as a progressive if she is touting his support.

Anonymous wrote:So, right now I am in Keam's District, but in 2024 I am in a new District - so can I vote in this special election? I suppose I can.

I see for a previous special election, all voters could vote in the firehouse primary - is that thought to be the case with this election?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has been announced that the election will be held on Saturday, October 1st, but they have not announced the polling location. There will only be 1 or 2 locations. I'm 110% supporting Holly Seibold because at least I know she actually cares about representing my neighbors and me and not about what this gets her next.

can you post a link to the information/announcement?

I havent seen anything from FCDC yet.

FCDC is changing the date they communicated to the candidates a few days ago because they can’t find an “available” location. Wouldn’t you look for locations BEFORE you announce a date? Check the Ffx County community use calendar with Neighborhood and Community Services. It’s not hard to find a school cafeteria/library/gym available on a random Saturday in October/November.

No doubt the FCDC will do everything they can to stack the deck in Frisch’s favor. I have no doubt that Holly Seibold would appeal to more local residents if they were aware of her candidacy but the FCDC will just look for ways to make Frisch’s nomination a foregone conclusion. And that’s a shame because Frisch completely sucks as a public official.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the dog park attacks make me uneasy. "The gay guy without kids favors dog parents more." That is a gross look.

The simple fact is that Blake Ln should have never been considered for an ES. Big kudos to Fritsch for stopping that unnecessary and wasteful plan.

The property was purchased to be a school, and we desperately need a school in that area. Neighboring schools are over capacity. Honestly the dog park thing was the nicest gloss you could put on the straight up NIMBYism driving the opposition.

Show me the CIP data that shows that a school is desperately needed there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, the dog park attacks make me uneasy. "The gay guy without kids favors dog parents more." That is a gross look.

The simple fact is that Blake Ln should have never been considered for an ES. Big kudos to Fritsch for stopping that unnecessary and wasteful plan.

The property was purchased to be a school, and we desperately need a school in that area. Neighboring schools are over capacity. Honestly the dog park thing was the nicest gloss you could put on the straight up NIMBYism driving the opposition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has been announced that the election will be held on Saturday, October 1st, but they have not announced the polling location. There will only be 1 or 2 locations. I'm 110% supporting Holly Seibold because at least I know she actually cares about representing my neighbors and me and not about what this gets her next.

can you post a link to the information/announcement?

I havent seen anything from FCDC yet.

FCDC is changing the date they communicated to the candidates a few days ago because they can’t find an “available” location. Wouldn’t you look for locations BEFORE you announce a date? Check the Ffx County community use calendar with Neighborhood and Community Services. It’s not hard to find a school cafeteria/library/gym available on a random Saturday in October/November.