Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many weeks ago were they calling Hutchinson a liar and promising they’d show up to testify under oath? How quickly things change.

Yeah, well, they are such MANLY MEN and ALPHA MALES that they are probably tripping over their own ginormous balls in the rush to testify. Give them a minute, okay?

I love you.

Did they ever make it over their mountainous balls and show up to testify? Maybe it's snowing up there, and they lost their crampons.

They were talking about it but someone tapped a keg and the next thing a bunch of hookers showed up….so no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many weeks ago were they calling Hutchinson a liar and promising they’d show up to testify under oath? How quickly things change.

Yeah, well, they are such MANLY MEN and ALPHA MALES that they are probably tripping over their own ginormous balls in the rush to testify. Give them a minute, okay?

I love you.

Did they ever make it over their mountainous balls and show up to testify? Maybe it's snowing up there, and they lost their crampons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Whatsapp group texts have never sounded so sinister.

WhatsApp texts are backed up to your phone unless you actively delete them

And all work-related communications are supposed to be on official devices using approved apps, not private phones and whatsapp.

Absolutely. And everyone knows that because of Hillary Clinton. But the point is that even if you don’t use an approved app like WhatsApp you have to actively delete your messages to get rid of the backups on your phone. WhatsApp doesn’t magically delete them.

Not True. Dept of State and DHS all love using What's App. In fact, if you have a beef with them they will try to LURE you into fielding your complaint call to them via What's App

Why??

So, that the second you hang up they can get busy Hacking your phone via the Whats App number you just gave them, which allowed them to know your location and , likely through 2 factor identification access to your email

Ok great that’s lovely. So USG is fond of WhatsApp. So why can’t they figure out how to find the backups for chats? I have them for my personal account l-it’s not that hard.

I think that's the point of this becoming a criminal investigation. People in government are saying they would have had to purposely override several text saving protections. It will probably be possible to identify which suspects were doing the deletions by location, individual device, and time period it was done.

Snap announced in financial news that they are freezing hires in hopes of not laying anyone off. This may be bad news (ha ha) for James M Murray. He'll now have the free time to testify and appear in court. Lawyer fees are going to suck though.
"Snap Misses Already Lowered Q2 Expectations, Says It Will ‘Substantially Slow’ Rate of Hiring"
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/snapchat-misses-already-lowered-q2-201843939.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Whatsapp group texts have never sounded so sinister.

WhatsApp texts are backed up to your phone unless you actively delete them

And all work-related communications are supposed to be on official devices using approved apps, not private phones and whatsapp.

Absolutely. And everyone knows that because of Hillary Clinton. But the point is that even if you don’t use an approved app like WhatsApp you have to actively delete your messages to get rid of the backups on your phone. WhatsApp doesn’t magically delete them.

Not True. Dept of State and DHS all love using What's App. In fact, if you have a beef with them they will try to LURE you into fielding your complaint call to them via What's App

Why??

So, that the second you hang up they can get busy Hacking your phone via the Whats App number you just gave them, which allowed them to know your location and , likely through 2 factor identification access to your email

Ok great that’s lovely. So USG is fond of WhatsApp. So why can’t they figure out how to find the backups for chats? I have them for my personal account l-it’s not that hard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Whatsapp group texts have never sounded so sinister.

WhatsApp texts are backed up to your phone unless you actively delete them

And all work-related communications are supposed to be on official devices using approved apps, not private phones and whatsapp.

Absolutely. And everyone knows that because of Hillary Clinton. But the point is that even if you don’t use an approved app like WhatsApp you have to actively delete your messages to get rid of the backups on your phone. WhatsApp doesn’t magically delete them.

Not True. Dept of State and DHS all love using What's App. In fact, if you have a beef with them they will try to LURE you into fielding your complaint call to them via What's App

Why??

So, that the second you hang up they can get busy Hacking your phone via the Whats App number you just gave them, which allowed them to know your location and , likely through 2 factor identification access to your email

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Whatsapp group texts have never sounded so sinister.

WhatsApp texts are backed up to your phone unless you actively delete them

And all work-related communications are supposed to be on official devices using approved apps, not private phones and whatsapp.

Absolutely. And everyone knows that because of Hillary Clinton. But the point is that even if you don’t use an approved app like WhatsApp you have to actively delete your messages to get rid of the backups on your phone. WhatsApp doesn’t magically delete them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I imagine some reluctant witnesses are becoming less reluctant.

They are lawyering up. [/b]Wonder if trump will pay their lawyer bills?[b]

LOL. Trump doesn’t pay his own lawyer bills and he’s going to pay for someone else’s? The RNC is paying Trump’s legal bills right now.

I do love that the RNC has to spend so much money depending Trump and his cronies rather than contesting elections

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Ha ha... there is no such thing as a USA smart phone that DHS, FBI, CIA aren't hacking into

Pegasus was invented by Palanitir and funded by CIA money channelled through InQtel in the usual fashion.

NSO group is just an offshoring of it to do a run around US Law that " CIA is not supposed to spy on Americans at home"

Any smart phone they want to target they do so, intercepting What's App text, reading your emails, using social intel schemes to create fake FB accounts, fake Twitter accounts and stalk people they are interested in, study your social network, your phone contacts and then do the same with all of your contacts

The obscene offense here is while this is what Department of Homeland Security is doing to destroy our freedoms, when it comes to they or a sub-agency like the USSS being similarly investigated , they claim " ooops ...gosh we accidentally deleted those texts ..." and " oh gosh, we don't seem to have a back up"

They are giving ALL of America the Finger, but of course many of us would say they have been doing that for years since they invented Pegasus and started invading the privacy of all Americans purely on whim, out of a grudge and above all without due process or a search warrant

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

So you agree they should sit through several days worth of public grilling about this? I concur and fully support that conclusion.

Millions were spent on a few missing emails. These missing secret service texts from an attempted coup need a full investigation.

In Hillary's case they were able to retrieve the missing emails - which in turn didn't show anything significant.

That sounds like an excellent precedent. A thorough public grilling, exhaustive efforts to retrieve the deleted documents, and -- then let's see what they say, shall we?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

So you agree they should sit through several days worth of public grilling about this? I concur and fully support that conclusion.

Millions were spent on a few missing emails. These missing secret service texts from an attempted coup need a full investigation.

In Hillary's case they were able to retrieve the missing emails - which in turn didn't show anything significant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

So you agree they should sit through several days worth of public grilling about this? I concur and fully support that conclusion.

Millions were spent on a few missing emails. These missing secret service texts from an attempted coup need a full investigation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

Sauce for the goose?

We had at least 11 different Republican-run investigations and sets of hearings into Hillary, at an expense of millions and millions of taxpayer dollars, including her testifying under oath for hours and hours and hours, none of which found any prosecutable evidence of genuine wrongdoing. So weird that you Republicans forget about all of that and *still* bleat "lock her up" as if none of that happened.

By the same token, Secret Service MUST be fully investigated, every lead followed, every rock turned over to get a full accounting of everything that transpired with the Secret Service on January 5th and 6th, the lead-up to it, and the coverup and destruction of evidence afterward. Likewise we need a full accounting of what happened with the FBI, Capitol Police, DoD etc.

Not just no prosecutable evidence. Trump admitted it was a sham once he was in office.

The right wing conspiracy theorists spent a 25 year campaign against Hillary Cinton that proved successful in 2016.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

Sauce for the goose?

We had at least 11 different Republican-run investigations and sets of hearings into Hillary, at an expense of millions and millions of taxpayer dollars, including her testifying under oath for hours and hours and hours, none of which found any prosecutable evidence of genuine wrongdoing. So weird that you Republicans forget about all of that and *still* bleat "lock her up" as if none of that happened.

By the same token, Secret Service MUST be fully investigated, every lead followed, every rock turned over to get a full accounting of everything that transpired with the Secret Service on January 5th and 6th, the lead-up to it, and the coverup and destruction of evidence afterward. Likewise we need a full accounting of what happened with the FBI, Capitol Police, DoD etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I work in IT. Heads would roll if something so basic as backups didn't happen and a catastrophic incident occurred.

Why aren't these backups automated?

They were automated. These messages were deleted as a part of a coverup.

PP here.. yea, that's pretty obvious because in IT, we never permanently delete anything before a backup is taken, and we never go through the backups to delete something.

Someone has a backup copy, or more than one copy. I would imagine there are several days worth up backups. Before you do a migration, you always take a backup. Always. So basic.

So, someone has a copy.

They were using private phones with encryption outside of the US governments control. I guess everyone just uses whatever they feel like using,

Butheremails.

Indeed.

Her emails set a precedent that everyone else can now follow. Sauce for the goose

So you agree they should sit through several days worth of public grilling about this? I concur and fully support that conclusion.