Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has deteriorated from legit to a typical DCUM snob thread. Gary, Indiana? Yes, depressing by any measure. A few other listed cities? Ditto. But Asheville, NC? Etc? Get real. Many of the cities listed here as "depressing" have large sections that are less "depressing" than the suburban sprawl that many of you are living in right now, I'm sure. I'd stick a fork in my eye before living in Fairfax or Montgomery counties.
Y'all think you're so damned special.
omg u r soooo kewl.
I mean, it's true. We have a second home about 75 miles outside of DC, and every time I drive through the DC suburbs going back and forth I get depressed. I could never, ever live in any of them. None is appealing in the least. None.
There is absolutely nowhere within a 75 mile radius of DC worth bothering to have a second home so this is hysterical snobbery to me
DP. I mean, c'mon. Shenandoah National Park is less than 75 miles from DC, for starters.
Shenandoah is great. Not great enough to bother maintaining a whole second home there which is my point. Second home in HHI? Sarasota? Sure. 75 miles of here? Lmao just why
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has deteriorated from legit to a typical DCUM snob thread. Gary, Indiana? Yes, depressing by any measure. A few other listed cities? Ditto. But Asheville, NC? Etc? Get real. Many of the cities listed here as "depressing" have large sections that are less "depressing" than the suburban sprawl that many of you are living in right now, I'm sure. I'd stick a fork in my eye before living in Fairfax or Montgomery counties.
Y'all think you're so damned special.
omg u r soooo kewl.
I mean, it's true. We have a second home about 75 miles outside of DC, and every time I drive through the DC suburbs going back and forth I get depressed. I could never, ever live in any of them. None is appealing in the least. None.
There is absolutely nowhere within a 75 mile radius of DC worth bothering to have a second home so this is hysterical snobbery to me
DP. I mean, c'mon. Shenandoah National Park is less than 75 miles from DC, for starters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tyson’s Corner
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The whole state of NV
So true. I lived in Las Vegas for a year for work once, and I have never been so lonely or depressed. It's so awful.
Anonymous wrote:Gary, Indiana
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you guys been to Cumberland lately? It definitely has a long way to go but at least near the trail there are a lot of businesses that seem to be thriving, people eating/drinking outside, etc. To me it’s disqualified from being the MOST depressing. The scenic setting alone is worth something. There are some real armpits out there.
I'm one of the Cumberland posters -have not been there for about 10 years so I'm glad to hear this!
Anonymous wrote:Tyson’s Corner
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, it would have to be a tie between Utica, New York, and Torrington, CT -- with the NY side of Niagara Falls being hot on both of their heels.
You?
The place that emotionally depressed me the most was Savannah. The combination of the slavery history and the alcoholic culture was really really sad and affected me in an unexpected way. I just could not appreciate the better aspects of the city as a result.
In terms of economically depressed, there are too many contenders, unfortunately. Many have already been mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LYNCHBURG, VA!
I was expecting to hate it, but was pleasantly surprised. Cute, quaint downtown with nice suburbs - given we did go to an event at the country club. Low COL and SML just an hour away!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has deteriorated from legit to a typical DCUM snob thread. Gary, Indiana? Yes, depressing by any measure. A few other listed cities? Ditto. But Asheville, NC? Etc? Get real. Many of the cities listed here as "depressing" have large sections that are less "depressing" than the suburban sprawl that many of you are living in right now, I'm sure. I'd stick a fork in my eye before living in Fairfax or Montgomery counties.
Y'all think you're so damned special.
omg u r soooo kewl.
I mean, it's true. We have a second home about 75 miles outside of DC, and every time I drive through the DC suburbs going back and forth I get depressed. I could never, ever live in any of them. None is appealing in the least. None.
There is absolutely nowhere within a 75 mile radius of DC worth bothering to have a second home so this is hysterical snobbery to me
It's likely a place in Calvert or St. Mary's, where I grew up and where I'll never live ever again. But still there's economic growth. It's not like WV and the like.
Anonymous wrote:For me, it would have to be a tie between Utica, New York, and Torrington, CT -- with the NY side of Niagara Falls being hot on both of their heels.
You?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has deteriorated from legit to a typical DCUM snob thread. Gary, Indiana? Yes, depressing by any measure. A few other listed cities? Ditto. But Asheville, NC? Etc? Get real. Many of the cities listed here as "depressing" have large sections that are less "depressing" than the suburban sprawl that many of you are living in right now, I'm sure. I'd stick a fork in my eye before living in Fairfax or Montgomery counties.
Y'all think you're so damned special.
omg u r soooo kewl.
I mean, it's true. We have a second home about 75 miles outside of DC, and every time I drive through the DC suburbs going back and forth I get depressed. I could never, ever live in any of them. None is appealing in the least. None.
There is absolutely nowhere within a 75 mile radius of DC worth bothering to have a second home so this is hysterical snobbery to me