Anonymous wrote:This thread is the most racist thing I’ve ever seen on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I totally agree with you, but it’s too late in my case. We were young and idealistic and fell for the lines that “every school in this county is much better than most schools in the US”, and “your kids will do fine no matter where they go to school because you are involved parents”, etc.
It was a very rough road with multiple regrets.
Hi OP!
Anonymous wrote:OP, I sort of hate that you work with children. Your post comes off so condescending.
Anonymous wrote:WOW. I have just as much a right to live where I live (30% FARMS school) as does everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher, maybe you should make more of an effort as a teacher to meet these kids needs and get them on grade level.
+1 as a TA at that school your job is to work hard and try to change the problems that you identify, not give up and say they can’t be helped. If that’s your perspective, then that school is not the setting for you. There’s no shame in admitting a job is not right for you.
She isn't going to change most of these problems. She won't change poverty and everything that goes with it. But there are things teachers can do to deal with the issues students bring to school. The book, The Poverty Problem, is great for understanding poverty and gives suggestions that can help in the classroom.
Thanks, I am familiar with that book and I often read it with the new teachers I mentor! I was unclear in my response--I don't think any of working in high-poverty schools can "fix" poverty or the way our school systems and zoning systems contribute to perpetuating it. But if one doesn't believe that they can make a difference in the lives of the children with whom they work, then they need to find a different setting in which to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To add, mixing kids is not a solution, it will just make schools equally bad. The answer is of course early intervention plus poverty reduction but it’s a long shot I know. It seems like more and more poor families just… appear from thin air? Not sure.
Um no, the data is clear that poor kids do way better in integrated schools.
What about kids who aren’t really poor?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To add, mixing kids is not a solution, it will just make schools equally bad. The answer is of course early intervention plus poverty reduction but it’s a long shot I know. It seems like more and more poor families just… appear from thin air? Not sure.
Um no, the data is clear that poor kids do way better in integrated schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's called "diversity" which sounds better than high poverty schools. Somehow it's supposed to be a good thing.
What? No. Plenty of schools are high poverty and not "diverse"
White people aren't immune from being poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's called "diversity" which sounds better than high poverty schools. Somehow it's supposed to be a good thing.
You are a racist bigot! hiding behind an anonymity board.
Anonymous wrote:It's called "diversity" which sounds better than high poverty schools. Somehow it's supposed to be a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I totally agree with you, but it’s too late in my case. We were young and idealistic and fell for the lines that “every school in this county is much better than most schools in the US”, and “your kids will do fine no matter where they go to school because you are involved parents”, etc.
It was a very rough road with multiple regrets.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I totally agree with you, but it’s too late in my case. We were young and idealistic and fell for the lines that “every school in this county is much better than most schools in the US”, and “your kids will do fine no matter where they go to school because you are involved parents”, etc.
It was a very rough road with multiple regrets.