Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Because of the way the rankings were calculated this year. It was consistently in the top 25-30 schools for 25+ years. The only thing that changed is how USNWR valued certain inputs to their calculations. Wake is not “in decline”
Wake tumbled considerably in the rankings. That’s a fact. All schools were subject to “the way the rankings were calculated this year”. And Wake dropped like a stone.
DP: The rankings may be a fact, but that they are a meaningful measure of educational quality is what is in contention. You could make a ranking of schools based on criteria that would make MIT drop like a stone and I wouldn't believe it was in decline either. The new rankings lessened the importance of faculty quality and increased the importance of percentage of Pell grant students in multiple factors. That might be important to on a societal level, but it doesn't impact the quality of education my UMC kid receives nor their career/grad school outcomes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Because of the way the rankings were calculated this year. It was consistently in the top 25-30 schools for 25+ years. The only thing that changed is how USNWR valued certain inputs to their calculations. Wake is not “in decline”
Wake tumbled considerably in the rankings. That’s a fact. All schools were subject to “the way the rankings were calculated this year”. And Wake dropped like a stone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Because of the way the rankings were calculated this year. It was consistently in the top 25-30 schools for 25+ years. The only thing that changed is how USNWR valued certain inputs to their calculations. Wake is not “in decline”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UChicago is the superior school, by a matter of magnitudes.
Because US News told you so? Wake is an stellar school, with far superior weather and 1000x safer surroundings than the Chicago warzone UofC is in.
Yes, but also because of the number of Nobel laureates in UChicago (at least 94) compared with 0 (?) in Wake Forest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Because of the way the rankings were calculated this year. It was consistently in the top 25-30 schools for 25+ years. The only thing that changed is how USNWR valued certain inputs to their calculations. Wake is not “in decline”
Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Anonymous wrote:Wake fell considerably in recent rankings. Wake is a school in decline.
Anonymous wrote:In our school the kids that get in to u Chicago are on top of the class and super smart and very competitive.
Kids that go to wake forest are less academically driven.
I am not sure the outcome after graduation, obviously kids change and in almost any school you can your goal if you work hard.