Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
I'm stunned that you think that's the right answer. The "right answer".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Don't be naive. KBJ wasn't stumped. She refused to answer with words that could be used in sound bite by scum Republicans who are more than willing to use degenerate tactics in ad campaigns for November elections.
The video clips are already making rounds. Publicity was not averted.
Of course not, but can you imagine how those low life Republican thugs would exploit KBJ with a clip of her saying the words "trans women" ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Don't be naive. KBJ wasn't stumped. She refused to answer with words that could be used in sound bite by scum Republicans who are more than willing to use degenerate tactics in ad campaigns for November elections.
The video clips are already making rounds. Publicity was not averted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd like to see a non-lawyer on the court eventually, and if not, definitely not someone from an Ivy.
Oh yes let's have a businessman. That seems to work out well. (S) Do you know how ignorant you are? Their job is to interpret subtleties in the law using their years of case knowledge. How would a non lawyer even know how to look up precedent? I think Thomas, with years on the EEOC and a couple of years as an appeals judge had very thin qualifications. He had never tried a case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Don't be naive. KBJ wasn't stumped. She refused to answer with words that could be used in sound bite by scum Republicans who are more than willing to use degenerate tactics in ad campaigns for November elections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
There are cis women and trans women. I'm stunned she was unable to state at least this. WTH
Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t know what a woman is.
Do you think RBG would be stumped?
This Ketanji is no RBG.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans such HUGE A**holes? Honestly, there is no amount of money in this world that would be enough to get me to associate with them. They are filth. Total bullying pricks. How rich to hear one of them talk about concern for institutions!
Republicans are just bullies. That is their only consistent stance. Being a bully. Everything else is negotiable.
Anonymous wrote:Why are Republicans such HUGE A**holes? Honestly, there is no amount of money in this world that would be enough to get me to associate with them. They are filth. Total bullying pricks. How rich to hear one of them talk about concern for institutions!