Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.

What do you think is on the tapes, that right wingers need to see? Seems like a bad idea to risk leaking the inner security workings of the Capitol to a bunch of loons who breached it to hang politicians.

I’m going to take a guess that you haven’t bothered watching any of the video released during trials. Who has time to worry about tainting jury pools when there’s something to be outraged about?! Also, why bother with holdback evidence when there’s an army of knuckle-draggers ready to take up arms against Fed LE?

Perspective is everything, and I’d like to see what’s on all the vid. There will be no ‘inner workings of the Capital’ being disclosed unless business is being done in the halls. I have watched a lot of video released, because that video is being used to put people in jail cells for years, holding them on misdemeanors, while letting dangerous criminals go free. In addition, if that video ‘taints’ jury pools, it’s because there is evidence on the video that doesn’t correlate with testimony. That’s why police bodycams are so critical - we can see why a police officer shot someone, when they are lying, and when they are being truthful.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.

Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please

Easy go to Utube.

Sersiously? Wow.

ALL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.

Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please

Easy go to Utube.

Sersiously? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.

What do you think is on the tapes, that right wingers need to see? Seems like a bad idea to risk leaking the inner security workings of the Capitol to a bunch of loons who breached it to hang politicians.

I’m going to take a guess that you haven’t bothered watching any of the video released during trials. Who has time to worry about tainting jury pools when there’s something to be outraged about?! Also, why bother with holdback evidence when there’s an army of knuckle-draggers ready to take up arms against Fed LE?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.

Lol all the Jan 6 coupist can see all the the video and present it as evidence in court. There are no judges restricting video evidence. Also all judges are right wing or right of center. There are no leftist judges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is a bigoted ignoramus who has tremendous power and this makes her singularly dangerous.

Next speaker of the house.

Anonymous wrote:She is a bigoted ignoramus who has tremendous power and this makes her singularly dangerous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.

Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.

Lol all the Jan 6 coupist can see all the the video and present it as evidence in court. There are no judges restricting video evidence. Also all judges are right wing or right of center. There are no leftist judges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.