Anonymous wrote:She looks like the would-be step-mom villain in the Lindsey Lohan version of the Parent Trap. That was an enjoyably cringe-worthy read.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

This is such nonsense. The comment about Hollywood is just false. Aside from Charlize Theron, I can't think of any A List, coveted blondes. And plenty of men think blondes are unappealing. There are some very lovely ones like Grace Kelly, but most have a porcine quality like Amy Schumer and Taylor Swift.

TS is gorgeous and her body is TDF. Did your partner leave you for a blonde? You are not well mentally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The wedding may be generic but the bride and groom look great. She’s very pretty and slim and he’s good looking in that wasp-y patrician sort of way. His hair looks good, her outfits are cute, flower girl dresses are sweet …. Really have to dig for something to not like here. Haters are gonna hate, I guess.

Will Kopelman, WASPy? Okay. Do you know what WASP is?

Um, yes, I do. And despite being of Jewish decent, the groom is clearly going for that New England Anglo look, with the hair, the slight tan, and the J. crew suit, and nary a kippah or chuppah ANYWHERE nor to mention the aesthetic of the wedding. An observation, not an insult.

- A Jew

Maybe they're not observant Jews? Is that allowed?

- another Jew

Sure, of course. But the observation up thread that it’s a WASP-y aesthetic has been met with people calling out that the groom and family is Jewish and that poster is “stupid.” The groom and family are 100% downplaying any Jewish or religious roots in favor of a more New England WASP vibe. That’s fine, I’m a non practicing Jew too. But it doesn’t negate the observation.

His family is very religious and this is a big reason why the marriage with Drew didn't work out, as she didn't convert. The girls are raised Jewish and traditional. Allie's mom is Jewish of Russian descent. Maybe this is the wedding that she wanted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

This is such nonsense. The comment about Hollywood is just false. Aside from Charlize Theron, I can't think of any A List, coveted blondes. And plenty of men think blondes are unappealing. There are some very lovely ones like Grace Kelly, but most have a porcine quality like Amy Schumer and Taylor Swift.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The wedding may be generic but the bride and groom look great. She’s very pretty and slim and he’s good looking in that wasp-y patrician sort of way. His hair looks good, her outfits are cute, flower girl dresses are sweet …. Really have to dig for something to not like here. Haters are gonna hate, I guess.

Will Kopelman, WASPy? Okay. Do you know what WASP is?

Um, yes, I do. And despite being of Jewish decent, the groom is clearly going for that New England Anglo look, with the hair, the slight tan, and the J. crew suit, and nary a kippah or chuppah ANYWHERE nor to mention the aesthetic of the wedding. An observation, not an insult.

- A Jew

Maybe they're not observant Jews? Is that allowed?

- another Jew

Sure, of course. But the observation up thread that it’s a WASP-y aesthetic has been met with people calling out that the groom and family is Jewish and that poster is “stupid.” The groom and family are 100% downplaying any Jewish or religious roots in favor of a more New England WASP vibe. That’s fine, I’m a non practicing Jew too. But it doesn’t negate the observation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The wedding may be generic but the bride and groom look great. She’s very pretty and slim and he’s good looking in that wasp-y patrician sort of way. His hair looks good, her outfits are cute, flower girl dresses are sweet …. Really have to dig for something to not like here. Haters are gonna hate, I guess.

Will Kopelman, WASPy? Okay. Do you know what WASP is?

Um, yes, I do. And despite being of Jewish decent, the groom is clearly going for that New England Anglo look, with the hair, the slight tan, and the J. crew suit, and nary a kippah or chuppah ANYWHERE nor to mention the aesthetic of the wedding. An observation, not an insult.

- A Jew

Maybe they're not observant Jews? Is that allowed?

- another Jew

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

This is such nonsense. The comment about Hollywood is just false. Aside from Charlize Theron, I can't think of any A List, coveted blondes. And plenty of men think blondes are unappealing. There are some very lovely ones like Grace Kelly, but most have a porcine quality like Amy Schumer and Taylor Swift.

OMG. DP here who is appalled at you. I’m a dark brunette, so no loyalty to blondes here. But you’re just nasty. “A porcine quality”? Would you dare to say that about black women? You really need to post a picture of yourself so we can see who is actually more porcine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She seems to be trying so hard to impress, compared to someone like Marina Rust, who radiates elegance, confidence, and a sense of humor about herself.

Marina Rust is the best.

And here's a picture from Marina Rust's wedding. So white! So classic! How dare she!

Anonymous wrote:I just wasted 4 minutes looking through that slideshow and reading the cringey captions. That was so bland. And, do they really have no Black friends or any POC to invite to their wedding? I mean, do they not even try to have some diverse friends? I just find it surprising.
Not a spectacular wedding at all. Pretty boring and bland.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

You do realize she's not really a blonde, right? If you count bottle blondes it's way more than 0.1% of women in the US, unless you don't consider the South part of the US for some reason. This thread made me realize she's kind of the living embodiment of that Tina Fey joke that if you put a blonde wig on a radiator some guy would start humping it. She's got a strangely shaped, masculine face, but she's skinny and "blonde" so she's an "ideal beauty"? Mmkay.

DP. With every post, you're outing yourself as an extremely jealous, petty, and mean person. Thought you should know.

I'm not the same person who called her plain Jane. But a Claudia Schiffer comparison is truly bananas. She's just thin with dyed blonde hair. She is not a great beauty and certainly not a supermodel. I'm not jealous I'm straight-up incredulous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

This is such nonsense. The comment about Hollywood is just false. Aside from Charlize Theron, I can't think of any A List, coveted blondes. And plenty of men think blondes are unappealing. There are some very lovely ones like Grace Kelly, but most have a porcine quality like Amy Schumer and Taylor Swift.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

You do realize she's not really a blonde, right? If you count bottle blondes it's way more than 0.1% of women in the US, unless you don't consider the South part of the US for some reason. This thread made me realize she's kind of the living embodiment of that Tina Fey joke that if you put a blonde wig on a radiator some guy would start humping it. She's got a strangely shaped, masculine face, but she's skinny and "blonde" so she's an "ideal beauty"? Mmkay.

DP. With every post, you're outing yourself as an extremely jealous, petty, and mean person. Thought you should know.

I'm not the same person who called her plain Jane. But a Claudia Schiffer comparison is truly bananas. She's just thin with dyed blonde hair. She is not a great beauty and certainly not a supermodel. I'm not jealous I'm straight-up incredulous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are crazy - she's absolutely gorgeous. And she has legs for miles.

She’s very plain Jane.

She is the classic blue eyed, blonde, tall, athletic with long legs. There are maybe 0.1% of all women in the US who have all these. She's basically the ideal beauty. And her hair is thick. Not damaged. I had a neighbor like this and also saw Claudia Schiffer IRL and those tall, all legs blondes are striking IRL. Look at Hollywood and the most attractive, famous ones have always been the blondes. Forget about your WASPs, all men are obsessed with white blondes - AA men, Asians, and especially Middle Easterns. It's like the ultimate trophy.
I don't have a bone in the fight, as I'm brunette with green eyes.

You do realize she's not really a blonde, right? If you count bottle blondes it's way more than 0.1% of women in the US, unless you don't consider the South part of the US for some reason. This thread made me realize she's kind of the living embodiment of that Tina Fey joke that if you put a blonde wig on a radiator some guy would start humping it. She's got a strangely shaped, masculine face, but she's skinny and "blonde" so she's an "ideal beauty"? Mmkay.

DP. With every post, you're outing yourself as an extremely jealous, petty, and mean person. Thought you should know.

I'm not the same person who called her plain Jane. But a Claudia Schiffer comparison is truly bananas. She's just thin with dyed blonde hair. She is not a great beauty and certainly not a supermodel. I'm not jealous I'm straight-up incredulous.