Anonymous wrote:At least one person at NPR grasps the truth and the severity of the problem if we don’t address it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dan is surely thinking of Dems but then the answer is obvious: WaPo is trying hard to please Dems, not antagonize them.

Surely he realizes a subscription-based service needs, duh, subscribers?

Please explain how the Washington Post “trying to please Dems” with these headlines.

By ignoring that the attacks on voting and elections started on November 2016.

A better headline would be "We created this monster. Let's now stop it"

How did the Post “ignore the attacks on voting and elections starting on November 2016?” Be specific.

Hahahahahahahaha

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dan is surely thinking of Dems but then the answer is obvious: WaPo is trying hard to please Dems, not antagonize them.

Surely he realizes a subscription-based service needs, duh, subscribers?

Please explain how the Washington Post “trying to please Dems” with these headlines.

By ignoring that the attacks on voting and elections started on November 2016.

A better headline would be "We created this monster. Let's now stop it"

How did the Post “ignore the attacks on voting and elections starting on November 2016?” Be specific.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Headline from the Washington Post: “In highly vaccinated New England, hospitals are under unprecedented strain as coronavirus surges”

In the 14th paragraph we finally read: “Doctors in the region all said that a substantial majority of the patients currently hospitalized with covid — between 60 percent and 80 percent — were unvaccinated. The breakthrough cases that end up in the hospital tend to be milder and are concentrated among older patients and people with other health conditions, they said.” Well, huh. You’re telling me that it’s the unvaccinated idiots who are filling hospitals in a well-vaccinated area and you don’t bother to indicate that in the headline or until halfway through the article?

And this is a fairly centrist source, but they’re still carrying the GOP’s water and allowing them to pretend that this surge isn’t being driven by mouth breathers (some of whom will be breathing via a tube soon).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/23/new-england-covid-surge/

60% vaccinated means that 40% (that’s almost half!) of the hospitalizations were vaccinated people. That really doesn’t fit the narrative of vaccines being so wonderful and worth all the risks for everyone no matter what. That’s why they hid it in the 14th paragraph. It seems like they needn’t have worried though, since evidently their target readership will believe the narrative no matter what the data says…

And LOL at wapo being a “fairly centrist source”. Seriously LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dan is surely thinking of Dems but then the answer is obvious: WaPo is trying hard to please Dems, not antagonize them.

Surely he realizes a subscription-based service needs, duh, subscribers?

Please explain how the Washington Post “trying to please Dems” with these headlines.

By ignoring that the attacks on voting and elections started on November 2016.

A better headline would be "We created this monster. Let's now stop it"

Anonymous wrote:Headline from the Washington Post: “In highly vaccinated New England, hospitals are under unprecedented strain as coronavirus surges”

In the 14th paragraph we finally read: “Doctors in the region all said that a substantial majority of the patients currently hospitalized with covid — between 60 percent and 80 percent — were unvaccinated. The breakthrough cases that end up in the hospital tend to be milder and are concentrated among older patients and people with other health conditions, they said.” Well, huh. You’re telling me that it’s the unvaccinated idiots who are filling hospitals in a well-vaccinated area and you don’t bother to indicate that in the headline or until halfway through the article?

And this is a fairly centrist source, but they’re still carrying the GOP’s water and allowing them to pretend that this surge isn’t being driven by mouth breathers (some of whom will be breathing via a tube soon).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/23/new-england-covid-surge/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dan is surely thinking of Dems but then the answer is obvious: WaPo is trying hard to please Dems, not antagonize them.

Surely he realizes a subscription-based service needs, duh, subscribers?

Please explain how the Washington Post “trying to please Dems” with these headlines.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We heard nothing but "her emails" for 6 years.

We have a 38 page Coup powerpoint and the media has already moved on.

If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know that the main stream media isn't "liberal" I don't know what will.

+1 And Mark Meadows was using private email for government business as well.

Anonymous wrote:It is one thing to be covering news with a slant. It is another entirely to do what Fox and OAN did in terms of outright propaganda and gaslighting.