Anonymous
10/20/2021 15:48
Subject: Re:Girls ECNL....1st month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10/19/21: Updated overall club rankings based on sum of PPG for all 6 age groups. Looks like 3 distinct tiers at this time....and SCUFC and BRYC.
CHARLOTTE SA - 13.97
RICHMOND UNITED - 13.87
NC COURAGE - 13.56
-----------------------------
CESA - 9.78
VDA - 9.70
LOUDOUN - 9.16
VA UNION - 9.07
-----------------------------
CISC - 7.85
ARLINGTON - 7.80
NC FUSION - 7.11
WILMINGTON - 6.93
-----------------------------
SCUFC - 5.31
-----------------------------
BRYC - 2.87
In my business world, an organization that moves close to 8-10 million dollars, owns its own property and showboats about their staff the performance and results of Loudoun are in similar parameters as the stinking Bryc
Do you own a papa Johns or a nail salon?
Loudoun have made progress
Younger age groups are winning, future is bright
Textbook definition of why Loudoun sucks azz. Kickball with U11 girls measuring 5’5 who will not be able to play soccer to save their lives by U13 or U14.
U14 is winning? U15 is winning?
It had been said time and time again that these would be the age groups that would perform because they are the first age groups to retain their talent from U9-U12 that Loudoun historically lost to FCV or McLean before they had ECNL themselves.
You don't have to like the style but the lack of results at older ages was due to loss of talent to other clubs.
Not a Loudoun parent. My DD plays for another ECNL club. How can you say Loudoun u15 is not doing well? They have 6 wins and 2 ties, no losses. Other than Union, they are the top performing NoVa club so far.
I think they meant "isn't" with the question mark afterwards (implying/stating that the U13s, U14s, and U15s are all now doing fairly well, and certainly much better than the older age groups which historically lost the talent to neighboring ECNL clubs FCV or Mclean).
Anonymous
10/20/2021 14:52
Subject: Re:Girls ECNL....1st month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10/19/21: Updated overall club rankings based on sum of PPG for all 6 age groups. Looks like 3 distinct tiers at this time....and SCUFC and BRYC.
CHARLOTTE SA - 13.97
RICHMOND UNITED - 13.87
NC COURAGE - 13.56
-----------------------------
CESA - 9.78
VDA - 9.70
LOUDOUN - 9.16
VA UNION - 9.07
-----------------------------
CISC - 7.85
ARLINGTON - 7.80
NC FUSION - 7.11
WILMINGTON - 6.93
-----------------------------
SCUFC - 5.31
-----------------------------
BRYC - 2.87
In my business world, an organization that moves close to 8-10 million dollars, owns its own property and showboats about their staff the performance and results of Loudoun are in similar parameters as the stinking Bryc
Do you own a papa Johns or a nail salon?
Loudoun have made progress
Younger age groups are winning, future is bright
Textbook definition of why Loudoun sucks azz. Kickball with U11 girls measuring 5’5 who will not be able to play soccer to save their lives by U13 or U14.
U14 is winning? U15 is winning?
It had been said time and time again that these would be the age groups that would perform because they are the first age groups to retain their talent from U9-U12 that Loudoun historically lost to FCV or McLean before they had ECNL themselves.
You don't have to like the style but the lack of results at older ages was due to loss of talent to other clubs.
Not a Loudoun parent. My DD plays for another ECNL club. How can you say Loudoun u15 is not doing well? They have 6 wins and 2 ties, no losses. Other than Union, they are the top performing NoVa club so far.