Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it wasn’t done to make it look more like Fairfax, it was done to be more diverse. All the best schools want more diversity, even the private ones. Even the best colleges want diversity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
More inclusive makes it more prestigious. When schools are more inclusive they rank much higher. Bet the matriculation looks better in about 5 years than it has in the recent years.
You can have the best STEM high school in the country or you can impose quotas to make it “look more like Fairfax County”, but you can’t have both. FCPS chose the latter.
All admission testing should be blind. Either you are smart enough to do well on the test - and therefore the workload at TJ - or you aren't. Should not be based on race.
Anonymous wrote:My kid (Indian) just graduated from TJ and is in college. I certainly wish the school had been more diverse. Reflecting the demographics of the local area will likely happen only if forced but more diversity is possible.
While the "typical kid" may not have gotten in this year, most kids admitted year are still qualified to be at TJ. Most negative comments assume otherwise.
I don't think TJ has to dilute anything to cater to this cohort. However, the curriculum is no cakewalk for even the highly prepped+gifted kids let alone the kids who are not as gifted (a good chunk of the kids at TJ are not gifted, just above-average). Hopefully the new cohort is motivated enough to keep up (they are all capable) and stay at TJ. If the curriculum does get diluted a bit, I think everyone benefits.
The other aspect of success at TJ is parent involvement. If parents cannot spend the time to shuttle their kids back and forth for ECs or sports they will not be able to leverage TJ to the fullest extent. Hopefully the school mitigates that through transportation arrangements.
Good luck to all the kids!
Anonymous wrote:My kid (Indian) just graduated from TJ and is in college. I certainly wish the school had been more diverse. Reflecting the demographics of the local area will likely happen only if forced but more diversity is possible.
While the "typical kid" may not have gotten in this year, most kids admitted year are still qualified to be at TJ. Most negative comments assume otherwise.
I don't think TJ has to dilute anything to cater to this cohort. However, the curriculum is no cakewalk for even the highly prepped+gifted kids let alone the kids who are not as gifted (a good chunk of the kids at TJ are not gifted, just above-average). Hopefully the new cohort is motivated enough to keep up (they are all capable) and stay at TJ. If the curriculum does get diluted a bit, I think everyone benefits.
The other aspect of success at TJ is parent involvement. If parents cannot spend the time to shuttle their kids back and forth for ECs or sports they will not be able to leverage TJ to the fullest extent. Hopefully the school mitigates that through transportation arrangements.
Good luck to all the kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid (Indian) just graduated from TJ and is in college. I certainly wish the school had been more diverse. Reflecting the demographics of the local area will likely happen only if forced but more diversity is possible.
While the "typical kid" may not have gotten in this year, most kids admitted year are still qualified to be at TJ. Most negative comments assume otherwise.
I don't think TJ has to dilute anything to cater to this cohort. However, the curriculum is no cakewalk for even the highly prepped+gifted kids let alone the kids who are not as gifted (a good chunk of the kids at TJ are not gifted, just above-average). Hopefully the new cohort is motivated enough to keep up (they are all capable) and stay at TJ. If the curriculum does get diluted a bit, I think everyone benefits.
The other aspect of success at TJ is parent involvement. If parents cannot spend the time to shuttle their kids back and forth for ECs or sports they will not be able to leverage TJ to the fullest extent. Hopefully the school mitigates that through transportation arrangements.
Good luck to all the kids!
Wow. Sad state of affairs. Let's the lower the bar and then call everyone a winner!
Anonymous wrote:it wasn’t done to make it look more like Fairfax, it was done to be more diverse. All the best schools want more diversity, even the private ones. Even the best colleges want diversity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
More inclusive makes it more prestigious. When schools are more inclusive they rank much higher. Bet the matriculation looks better in about 5 years than it has in the recent years.
You can have the best STEM high school in the country or you can impose quotas to make it “look more like Fairfax County”, but you can’t have both. FCPS chose the latter.
Anonymous wrote:My kid (Indian) just graduated from TJ and is in college. I certainly wish the school had been more diverse. Reflecting the demographics of the local area will likely happen only if forced but more diversity is possible.
While the "typical kid" may not have gotten in this year, most kids admitted year are still qualified to be at TJ. Most negative comments assume otherwise.
I don't think TJ has to dilute anything to cater to this cohort. However, the curriculum is no cakewalk for even the highly prepped+gifted kids let alone the kids who are not as gifted (a good chunk of the kids at TJ are not gifted, just above-average). Hopefully the new cohort is motivated enough to keep up (they are all capable) and stay at TJ. If the curriculum does get diluted a bit, I think everyone benefits.
The other aspect of success at TJ is parent involvement. If parents cannot spend the time to shuttle their kids back and forth for ECs or sports they will not be able to leverage TJ to the fullest extent. Hopefully the school mitigates that through transportation arrangements.
Good luck to all the kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it wasn’t done to make it look more like Fairfax, it was done to be more diverse. All the best schools want more diversity, even the private ones. Even the best colleges want diversity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
More inclusive makes it more prestigious. When schools are more inclusive they rank much higher. Bet the matriculation looks better in about 5 years than it has in the recent years.
You can have the best STEM high school in the country or you can impose quotas to make it “look more like Fairfax County”, but you can’t have both. FCPS chose the latter.
Yes, but no matter the euphemisms or how you want to reconcile it, cancelling the very metrics that measure student ability to handle challenging academics seems counterintuitive. Why do we play the emperor has no clothes with reality? If you can’t read someone, how do you know what they can do? You eventually find out when the answer is obvious, or you lower the academic rigor out of “fairness”.
Meanwhile, China keeps cranking out engineers and isn’t lowering the bar for admission.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:it wasn’t done to make it look more like Fairfax, it was done to be more diverse. All the best schools want more diversity, even the private ones. Even the best colleges want diversity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
More inclusive makes it more prestigious. When schools are more inclusive they rank much higher. Bet the matriculation looks better in about 5 years than it has in the recent years.
You can have the best STEM high school in the country or you can impose quotas to make it “look more like Fairfax County”, but you can’t have both. FCPS chose the latter.
Yes, but no matter the euphemisms or how you want to reconcile it, cancelling the very metrics that measure student ability to handle challenging academics seems counterintuitive. Why do we play the emperor has no clothes with reality? If you can’t read someone, how do you know what they can do? You eventually find out when the answer is obvious, or you lower the academic rigor out of “fairness”.
Meanwhile, China keeps cranking out engineers and isn’t lowering the bar for admission.
Anonymous wrote:it wasn’t done to make it look more like Fairfax, it was done to be more diverse. All the best schools want more diversity, even the private ones. Even the best colleges want diversity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
More inclusive makes it more prestigious. When schools are more inclusive they rank much higher. Bet the matriculation looks better in about 5 years than it has in the recent years.
You can have the best STEM high school in the country or you can impose quotas to make it “look more like Fairfax County”, but you can’t have both. FCPS chose the latter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
It's possible this may be the case in the short term, but in the long term, the investment should pay off in the form of greater interest from a wider pool of applicants. It doesn't speak highly of TJ's real prestige that significantly fewer students applied for the Class of, say, 2024 than the Class of 2004. Most elite academic schools look for their application numbers to increase so that their school becomes MORE selective - not less. It's amusing to me that folks on this board feel like TJ is super-prestigious when entire segments of the population had no interest in applying for such a long time.
When you finally start seeing TJ's application numbers grow with the population of its catchment areas, you'll know that the school is becoming more prestigious.
A lot of people buy lottery tickets, too, but that doesn't mean the people with the winning ticket are highly respected.
And is it really a good thing to encourage the kids who might be the role models at a Justice or Lewis to apply to TJ instead?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.
It's possible this may be the case in the short term, but in the long term, the investment should pay off in the form of greater interest from a wider pool of applicants. It doesn't speak highly of TJ's real prestige that significantly fewer students applied for the Class of, say, 2024 than the Class of 2004. Most elite academic schools look for their application numbers to increase so that their school becomes MORE selective - not less. It's amusing to me that folks on this board feel like TJ is super-prestigious when entire segments of the population had no interest in applying for such a long time.
When you finally start seeing TJ's application numbers grow with the population of its catchment areas, you'll know that the school is becoming more prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:The one constant is how self-congratulatory TJ parents are, whether we really need a TJ or whether their kids deserve to be there or not. Some of the new kids may not prepared, but the parents will hit the ground running.
Anonymous wrote:More inclusive, less prestigious. That’s the choice they made.