Anonymous wrote:My child is just beginning the college process. Her reach schools are those that dcum would scorn as safeties. But she is autistic with several learning disabilities, and when she started high school I didn't think she would make it to college. So, no, I'm not embarrassed -- I'm thrilled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Many smart kids and rich kids have learning disabilities. You seem woefully uninformed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?
In the social circle where my kids were raised in the DMV, most of the kids were smart. If they didn't end up in prestigious schools, it's because they were pampered and indulged and got lazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, I'll bite. I wasn't disappointed in my kids' college choices because they all got into well known schools that DCUM would consider prestigious. Had they not, I would have been disappointed for sure and probably embarrassed. Kids around here have every advantage. To those who are given a lot, a lot should be expected.
I hate pampered, underachieving rich kids.
Yikes.
Why do you assume rich = intelligence?
And why do assume kids who go to non-elite schools (i.e. most college students) are not hard-working?