Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm an ITS parent, and I don't think that this school, or any, will re-open if they aren't confident in the mitigation strategies they have been developing. It isn't worth the risk to students or staff. I'm guessing they are trying to walk the line of informing families when necessary and causing panic if it isn't. Some people will view that as suspicious; others see it as pragmatic. definitely seems like the piece wasn't out to be balanced, but I'm grateful that fellow parent Mary shared her perspective because it does reflect mine and that of many others.
I agree. I'm not that concerned with the inevitable delays and hiccups as long as things are set to go by 8:00 Wednesday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised ITS parents aren't more concerned about this. Not telling other staff who have been exposed and making them continue to hold indoor activities is scarily reckless. Isn't it likely that more staff have been infected now?? Doesn't the secrecy and recklessness bother people?
I am an ITS parent and am pretty appalled. I don't really trust the school to protect my child and family from Covid and I am pretty much at a loss about what to do at this point. Even the lunch "wins" mentioned above seem very weak to me. From the official communication, I have no idea if my child will eat outside once a month or 90% of the time. This matters to me and my family - and even my child!
Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised ITS parents aren't more concerned about this. Not telling other staff who have been exposed and making them continue to hold indoor activities is scarily reckless. Isn't it likely that more staff have been infected now?? Doesn't the secrecy and recklessness bother people?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised ITS parents aren't more concerned about this. Not telling other staff who have been exposed and making them continue to hold indoor activities is scarily reckless. Isn't it likely that more staff have been infected now?? Doesn't the secrecy and recklessness bother people?
It bothers me.
Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised ITS parents aren't more concerned about this. Not telling other staff who have been exposed and making them continue to hold indoor activities is scarily reckless. Isn't it likely that more staff have been infected now?? Doesn't the secrecy and recklessness bother people?
Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised ITS parents aren't more concerned about this. Not telling other staff who have been exposed and making them continue to hold indoor activities is scarily reckless. Isn't it likely that more staff have been infected now?? Doesn't the secrecy and recklessness bother people?
Anonymous wrote:So I guess some classes may have subs on the first day?
Anonymous wrote:So I guess some classes may have subs on the first day?
Anonymous wrote:I'm an ITS parent, and I don't think that this school, or any, will re-open if they aren't confident in the mitigation strategies they have been developing. It isn't worth the risk to students or staff. I'm guessing they are trying to walk the line of informing families when necessary and causing panic if it isn't. Some people will view that as suspicious; others see it as pragmatic. definitely seems like the piece wasn't out to be balanced, but I'm grateful that fellow parent Mary shared her perspective because it does reflect mine and that of many others.