Anonymous wrote:First, I am skeptical boosters will make any difference in the course of the pandemic compared to vaccinating more people for a variety of reasons:
-Though studies show efficacy at preventing infection wanes, the two vaccines in question were still 95% effective at preventing hospitalization. And most infections are still in the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated are the driver of the pandemic.
-There is likely to be confusing government messaging about boosters
-I think uptake will be lower than for the vaccine. For people who had access issues in the first place it may be too much of a hassle. And I think there will be a camp of people who gladly took the vaccine but will have "booster hesitancy." I think the messaging will contribute to this. They will say now it is just not a one time thing but something I have to do every 6 months for the rest of my life.
Second, the idea of COVID boosters seem to be more in line with a COVID zero mentality than with COVID is endemic mentality. People have unreasonable expectations about vaccines. No one said they were 100 percent effective. They greatly reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. What is the marginal benefit for a fully vaccinated person? Preventing mostly mild breakthrough infections?
The WHO is not recommending boosters. Obviously unlike the CDC they are concerned about much of the world's population not being vaccinated at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am unvaccinated but have already had covid. My blood is still showing antibodies, 9 months later. Pretty sure I don't need a vaccine.
Those antibodies are only going to protect you against the strain of Covid you had. If you want protection from delta or any other strain, you need a vaccine.
Anonymous wrote:Because Fox and rightwing media lie to 40% of the country.
It’s a lot easier to persuade those who live in reality to get a booster than it is to break Murdoch’s hold on the unvaccinated.
Anonymous wrote:I am unvaccinated but have already had covid. My blood is still showing antibodies, 9 months later. Pretty sure I don't need a vaccine.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think we are going to move the needle much on the unvaccinated in the US.
Now if we could find a way to efficiently ship doses to Africa and make sure the infrastructure was there to use them, I'd chip in time to help out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will it mean to be "fully vaccinated?" Three doses for everyone? Three doses only for the vulnerable and immunocompromised? A booster within the past 6 months? I think it will get very complicated.
I have been wondering about this too, especially with more and more vaccine mandates coming into play. For the purposes of "you must be fully vaccinated or have a test to... work... go to the theater... whatever..." - does that mean two shots now but the requirement will be 3 in a few months?
Anonymous wrote:Unintelligent people who continue to deny the importance of vaccination will never be convinced unless someone close to them becomes severely ill or dies.
Begging and pleading won’t convince them. So, the focus needs to be on providing boosters when vaccine efficacy wanes.
I think the Covid vaccine will end up like the flu shot. People will need to get it every year. It won’t totally eliminate risk of getting sick, but it will help prevent severe illness requiring hospitalization.
The real focus right now needs to be on approving the vaccine for pediatric use in the under-12 population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m immunocompromised due to cancer. I fought to get two shots as quickly as I could. Then I got the bad news that my immune system didn’t respond. Getting the third shot could keep me from getting very ill or dying. I’m not taking a shot away from anyone in the US. We have plenty.
I think many/most people support 3rd shots for the immunocompromised and I hope you have a good immune response this time.
It's the boosters for incompetent adults just because part of the immune system response may be waning that people are questioning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m immunocompromised due to cancer. I fought to get two shots as quickly as I could. Then I got the bad news that my immune system didn’t respond. Getting the third shot could keep me from getting very ill or dying. I’m not taking a shot away from anyone in the US. We have plenty.
I think many/most people support 3rd shots for the immunocompromised and I hope you have a good immune response this time.
It's the boosters for incompetent adults just because part of the immune system response may be waning that people are questioning.
I feel like unlike with the initial vaccine, the CDC/white house statement the other day recommending boosters was not met with unanimous support from the medical community. Many articles had experts questioning the need for most people under 65. There are different messages, and this is leaving people confused.
Anonymous wrote:What will it mean to be "fully vaccinated?" Three doses for everyone? Three doses only for the vulnerable and immunocompromised? A booster within the past 6 months? I think it will get very complicated.