Anonymous wrote:^edit and I mean protecting your assets from creditors, not the other spouse.

I was thinking the same thing. The only thing that you should jointly own is the marital home and one joint bank account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes of course, although 50% of the value of a car in the grand scheme of things should be too trivial to fight about.

Not OP but my DH just gifted me a $130k vehicle. Not trivial.

You mean he bought you a car. Just say “bought” and “car” like a normal person.

Maybe it’s not a car. Maybe it’s a tractor

Or an 18 wheeler she uses to deliver produce cross country

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes of course, although 50% of the value of a car in the grand scheme of things should be too trivial to fight about.

Not OP but my DH just gifted me a $130k vehicle. Not trivial.

You mean he bought you a car. Just say “bought” and “car” like a normal person.

Maybe it’s not a car. Maybe it’s a tractor

Is this part of the tractor story?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes of course, although 50% of the value of a car in the grand scheme of things should be too trivial to fight about.

Not OP but my DH just gifted me a $130k vehicle. Not trivial.

You mean he bought you a car. Just say “bought” and “car” like a normal person.

Maybe it’s not a car. Maybe it’s a tractor

If you drive a $170K car and you are sweating who gets it in the divorce, what's wrong with this picture.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes of course, although 50% of the value of a car in the grand scheme of things should be too trivial to fight about.

Not OP but my DH just gifted me a $130k vehicle. Not trivial.

You mean he bought you a car. Just say “bought” and “car” like a normal person.

When I divorced we had three cars that were all paid off. I got to keep 2 cars. In exchange I let him keep all the furniture in the house.

I live in a equitable distribution state. OP